A study of Antenatal risk factors and fetal outcome in IUGR pregnancies

  • Dr Deeba Shafi Zubair Senior Consultant, Gynecologist, Alshifa Multi Speciality Hospital Jamianagar, New Delhi, India
  • Dr Shivani Sachdev Gour Senior Consultant, Gynecologist, SCI Heathcare Greater Kailash One, New Delhi, India
Keywords: Antenatal, IUGR, Low birth weight, Pregnancy, Risk factors

Abstract

Introduction: Low birth weight (LBW) (neonate weighing <2500 g) is a multifactorial phenomenon.Many maternal and fetal factors are found significantly to be associated with the low birthweight.

Material and Methods: It was a retrospective record based study carried out in tertiary care hospitals in Delhi where the authors work between May 2013 and December 2014. The study population consisted of 200 IUGR cases (babies weighing less than 2 kgs).

Results: In our study, maximum 80 (40%) of the IUGR cases found in primigravidas, and minimum 24 (12%) cases were found in 4th gravida. In our study 82 (41%) of the IUGR cases found in Normotensives, 59 (29.5%) cases were found in mild hypertensives and minimum 18 (09%) cases were found in severe hypertensive mothers. In our study 90 (45%) of the IUGR cases found in pregnant women had normal haemoglobulin levels, maximum 56 (28%) cases found in pregnant women had mild anemia and minimum 12 (06%) cases found in pregnant women had severe anemia.

Conclusion: From the available literature reviewed it was found that the major risk factor for IUGR was lack of knowledge in the mothers regarding prevention of IUGR. Hence there is a need to assess the knowledge of rural primigravidas mothers and conduct a structured teaching programme on prevention of IUGR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Selvaraj J P. A study on IUGR. Nightingale nursing times.2007.june; 3(3):P.9-11.

2. Deshmukh JS, Motghare DD, Zodpey SP, Wadhva SK. Low birth weight and associated maternal factors in an urban area. Indian Pediatr. 1998 Jan;35(1):33-6.

3. Singh G, Chouhan R, Sidhu K. Maternal factors for low birth weight babies. Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2009; 65:10-12.

4. International Classification of Disease, Ninth revision, Volume 1. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1977.

5. Deonis M. Blossner M, Villar J. Levels and patterns of IUGR in developing countries. Available at http://www.unu.edu/ unupress/food2/UIDO3E/uid03e05.html

6. WHO (1995) Bridging the gaps. The World Health Report 1995. Report of the Director General.

7. Moore LG, Zamudio S, Zhuang J, Sun S, Droma T. Oxygen transport in tibetan women during pregnancy at 3,658 m. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Jan;114(1):42-53.

8. Arora. N. K, Paul. V.K, Singh Meharban- neonatal section. Journal of Paediatrics.2002 August; l 4(6):25.

9. Abrams BF, Laros RK Jr. Prepregnancy weight, weight gain, and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Mar;154(3):503-9.

10. Visser GH. Early fetal growth retardation. Obs Gyn1986;67(1):20-24.

11. Odegård RA, Vatten LJ, Nilsen ST, Salvesen KA, Austgulen R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):950-5.

12. Allen LH. Biological mechanisms that may underlie Iron’s effect on preterm birth. Journal of Nutrition. Feb 2000:581-589.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i05.01
Published: 2016-05-31
How to Cite
1.
Deeba SZ, Sachdev Gour S. A study of Antenatal risk factors and fetal outcome in IUGR pregnancies. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2016May31 [cited 2024Nov.8];4(5):677-8. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/538
Section
Original Article