A novel device to measure tactile reaction time

  • Dr. Raveendra Singh Rajpoot Associate Professor, Department of Physiology, UPRIMS&R, Saifai, Etawah, UP, India
  • Dr Stuti Tandon Junior Resident, Department of Anatomy, KGMU, Lucknow, UP, India
  • Dr. Pradeep kumar Professor, Department of Physiology, KGMU, Lucknow, UP, India
  • Dr Kailash Mittal Assistant Professor, Department of Radiotherapy, UPRIMS & R, Etawah, UP, India
  • Dr. Sankalp Awasthi Assistant Professor, Department of Dermatology, UPRIMS&R, Etawah, UP, India
  • Dr. Ajai Gupta Demonstrator, Department of Biochemistry, UPRIMS&R, Etawah, Up, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i11.235
Keywords: Reaction Time, Tactile, Mental Chronometry

Abstract

Introduction: Reaction Time has been widely used as one of the measures of mental chronometry since very long. Most of the work has been done with visual and auditory reaction time. Till now reaction time has never been measured by giving tactile stimuli. Hence we have designed a new device to provide different tactile stimuli and to simultaneously measure the time taken by the subject to respond to it. Probably for the first time in the history of mental chronometry Tactile Choice Reaction Time has been compared between males and females.

Methods and Materials: The study was conducted among 53 male and 34 female healthy subjects who were between the age group of 18- 24 years. A new instrument has been designed by the author of this article to deliver tactile stimuli on the skin of the subject and to measure the reaction time for that particular sensory modality.

Result: All the reaction times were found to be significantly faster in males than in females except for fine touch. For fine touch although the RT is faster in males but the difference is not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Present study has reconfirmed the gender differences in case of tactile choice reaction time also. It is going to be really interesting with the use of this new device to find out the relationship of various Tactile Choice Reaction Times with these conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lofthus GK. The sensory motor performance and the limb preference. Percepts Mot or Skills. 1981 Jun;52(3):688-93.

2. Duke-Elder S. Franciscus Cornelis Donders. Br J Ophthalmol. 1959 Feb;43(2):65–8. [PubMed]

3. Luce RD. London: Academic Press; 1968. [Last accessed on 2011 Aug 08]. Information Theory of Choice. Reaction Times. Available from: http://www.biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm.

4. Welford AT. Choice reaction time: Basic concepts. In: Welford AT, editor. Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press; 1980. pp. 73–128. [PubMed]

5. Kosinski RJ. A literature review on reaction time, Clemson University (2008).

6. Taoka, George T. Mrake Reaction Times of Unalerted Drivers. ITE Journal 1989 Mar;59(3):19-21.

7. Salthouse TA. Aging and measures of processing speed. Biological Psychology 2000 Oct;54(1-3):35-54. [PubMed]

8. Pain MT, Hibbs A. Sprint starts and the minimum auditory reaction time. J Sports Sci. 2007 Jan;25(1):79–86. [PubMed]

9. Thompson PD, Colebatch JG, Brown P, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Obeso JA, et al. Voluntary stimulus-sensitive jerks and jumps mimicking myoclonus or pathological startle syndromes. Mov Disord. 1992;7(3):257–62. [PubMed]

10. Noble D, Baker BL, Jones TA. Age and sex parameters in psychomotor learning. Percept Mot Skills 1964 Dec;19:935-45. [PubMed]

11. Adam JJ, Pass FG, Buekers MJ, Wuyts IJ, Spijkers WA, Wallmeyer P. Gender differences in choice reaction time: Evidence for differential strategies. Ergonomics 1999 Feb;42(2):327-35. [PubMed]

12. Der G, Deary IJ. Age and sex differences in reaction time in adulthood. Results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychol Aging 2006 Mar;21(1):62-73.

13. Misra N, Mahajan KK, Maini BK. Comparative study of visual and auditory reaction time of hands and feet in males and females. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 1985 Oct-Dec:29(4):213-8. [PubMed]

14. Nikam LH, Gadkari JV. Effect of age, gender and body mass index on visual and auditory reaction time in Indian population. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol 2012 Jan-Mar;56(1):94-9. [PubMed]

15. Botwinick J, Thompson LW. Components of reaction time in relation to age and sex. J Genet Psychol.1966 Jun;108(second half):175–83. [PubMed]

16. Nakamoto H, Mori S. Sport-specific decision-making in a Go/NoGo reaction task: Difference among nonathletes and baseball and basketball players. Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Feb;106(1):163–70.

17. Ghuntla TP, Mehta HB, Gokhale PA, Shah CJ. A comparative study of visual reaction time in basketball players and healthy controls. Natl J Integr Res Med. 2012;3:49. [PubMed]

18. Spirduso WW. Reaction and movement time as a function of age and physical activity level. J Gerontol.1975 Jul;30(4):435–40. [PubMed]

19. Gavkare AM, Nanaware NL, Surdi AD. Auditory reaction time, visual reaction time and whole body reaction time in athletes. Ind Med Gaz. 2013;6:214–9. [PubMed]

20. Welford AT. London: Menthuen; 1968. [Last accessed on 2011 Aug 08]. Fundamentals of Skill. Available from: http://www.biology.clemson.edu/bpc/bp/Lab/110/reaction.htm.

21. Demetriou A, Mouyi A, Spanoudis G. Modeling the structure and deveopment of g. Intelligence 2008;5(5):437-54.

22. Deary IJ, Der G, Ford G. Reaction times and intelligence differences. A population based cohort study. Intelligence 2001;29(5):389-99.

23. Posner, Michael K. Timing the Brain: Mental Chronometry as Tool in Neuroscience. PLoS Biology 2005 Feb;3(2):e51.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i11.235
Published: 2015-12-31
How to Cite
1.
Singh Rajpoot R, Tandon S, kumar P, Mittal K, Awasthi S, Gupta A. A novel device to measure tactile reaction time. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2015Dec.31 [cited 2024Nov.19];3(11):1294-9. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/409
Issue
Vol 3 No 11 (2015): DECEMBER
Section
Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)