A study to assess the role of contrast-enhanced multiphasic, multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of renal lesions

  • Dr. Nitin Khantal Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Laxman P. Ahirwar Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Chirayu Medical College, and Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
Keywords: Computed Tomography, Renal lesions Spiral CT

Abstract

Aim: To assess the role of Contrast-Enhanced Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography in the evaluation of renal lesions and its potential role in differentiating benign from malignant lesions.

Material and Method: This prospective study was done in the Department of Radiodiagnosis Chirayu Medical College and Hospital Bhopal. A total of 100 patients to our department with strong clinical suspicion of renal lesions and those diagnosed by ultrasonography underwent Contrast-Enhanced Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomographic evaluation of abdomen using 64 Multislice Spiral CT scanner from August 2015 to July 2019.

Results: The majority of patients presenting with renal lesions were each of the age groups <15 years and >40 years. Most of the patients were males 57%. The most common clinical complaint was renal colic 58(46%) and hematuria. The most common pathology was calculus 35(35%) second most common pathology was congenital anomalies 23(23%). The CT accuracy for detection of benign cystic lesion in this study was 94.7%, benign lesions were 92.6%and for malignant lesions was 86.6% in the present study.

Conclusion: The accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Multiphasic Multidetector Computed Tomography in detecting and characterizing renal lesions is high and it should be considered in the imaging workup of any patient with a renal complaint

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Srougi V, Kato RB, Salvatore FA, Ayres PP, Dall'Oglio MF, Srougi M. Incidence of benign lesions according to tumor size in solid renal masses. Int Braz J Urol. 2009;35(4):427-431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-55382009000400005.

Israel GM, Bosniak MA. How I do it: evaluating renal masses. Radiol. 2005;236(2):441–450. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362040218.

Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM, Tannir NM, Tamboli P, Sandler CM. Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(4):1220-1232. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.07.3568.

Coll DM, Smith RC. Update on radiological imaging of renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2007;99(5 Pt B):1217-1222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2007.06824.x.

Pahernik S, Ziegler S, Roos F, Melchior SW, Thüroff JW. Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size. J Urol. 2007;178(2):414-417. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.129.

Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi–detector row CT urography. Radiol. 2002;222(2):353-360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2222010667.

Lin WC, Wang JH, Wei CJ, Chang CY. Assessment of CT urography in the diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities. J Chi Med Assoc. 2004;67(2):73-78.

Smith RC, Verga M, Dalrymple N, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT. Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167(5):1109-1113. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911160.

Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiol. 1996;200(3):753-758. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756927.

Bosniak MA. Diagnosis and management of patients with complicated cystic lesions of the kidney. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(3):819-821. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.169.3.9275903.

Majd M, Nussbaum Blask AR, Markle BM, Shalaby-Rana E, Pohl HG, Park JS, et al. Acute pyelonephritis: comparison of diagnosis with 99mTc-DMSA SPECT, spiral CT, MR imaging, and power Doppler US in an experimental pig model. Radiol. 2001;218(1):101-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.218.1.r01ja37101.

Catalano C, Fraioli F, Laghi A, Napoli A, Pediconi F, Danti M, et al. High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(5):1271-1277. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801271.

Millan-Rodriguez F, Palou J, De la Torre-Holguera P, Vayreda-Martija JM, Villavicencio-Mavrich H, Vicente-Rodriguez J. Conventional CT signs in staging transitional cell tumors of the upper urinary tract. Europe Urol. 1999;35(4):318-322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000019869.

Fishman EK, Hartman DS, Goldman SM, Siegelman SS. The CT appearance of Wilms tumor. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1983;7(4):659-665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198308000-00014.

CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2020.i02.07
Published: 2020-04-30
How to Cite
1.
Khantal DN, P. Ahirwar L. A study to assess the role of contrast-enhanced multiphasic, multidetector computed tomography in the evaluation of renal lesions. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2020Apr.30 [cited 2024Apr.26];8(2):176-82. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/1165
Section
Original Article