Retrospective analysis of HSG in primary infertility

  • Dr. R K Mishra Associate Professor, L. N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M P.) India
  • Dr. P K Dave Assistant Professor, L. N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M P.) India
  • Dr. M Jain Department of Radiodiagnosis, L. N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M P.) India
  • Dr. Malini Bhardwaj L. N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M P.) India
  • Dr S Jain Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, L. N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal (M P.) India
Keywords: Hysterosalpingography, Infertility, Uterus

Abstract

Introduction: Hysterosalpingography used to be a common Radiological Investigation since long time for the investigation of infertility. In the current era of imaging HSG remains to be a choice of investigation for infertility cases. It provides anatomical depiction of uterus and fallopian tubes by introduction of contrast agent.

Objective: Objective of this study is to analyze the common pathological conditions detected on HSG in cases of primary infertility.

Methodology: 140 cases of HSG were reviewed retrospectively in cases of primary infertility. Study covered age ranging from 20 yrs to 42 yrs. The largest number of patients who reported were between the age of 26 – 30 years –47.14 %. Maximum patients were in the marital duration of 2-5 yrs -65%, followed by 6-10 Yrs -24% and remaining 16 % above the duration of more than 10 yrs. Routine use of contraceptives by both partners were excluded in this study. Infertility caused by the male factor was al1so excluded. Standard protocol for HSG was followed with use of water soluble contrast.

Results: Analysis of 140 cases show common cause of infertility as congenital uterine anomalies - 6.42 %, various levels of tubal blocks–17.2%, Uterine SOL/ Fibroid– 4.28% and pelvic adhesions- 6.42%.

Conclusion: Hysterosalpingography still remains the choice of investigation in cases of primary infertility. Most of the cases with primary infertility had a normal HSG, followed by various uterine congenital anomalies and fallopian tube obstruction with or with hydrosalpinx.HSG is repeatable, cost effective, safe and less time-consuming procedure except for the fact that it involves small X-ray exposure to patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Paul C. Adamson,Karl Krupp,Alexandra H. Freeman,Jeffrey D. Klausner,Arthur L. Reingold,Purnima Madhivanan. Prevalence and correlates of primary infertility among young women in Mysore , India. Indian J Med Res. 2011 Oct; 134(4): 440–446.

Niharika Tripathi, Infertility among Indian Women: Emerging Evidence and Need for Policy Measures. International Institute for Population Sciences (I.I.P.S), Mumbai, India. Princeton.edu/papers/110609.

JosephBakoIgashi, DlamaZira Joseph, Gloria Joseph, SaiduKadas, GeofreyLuntsi, FlaviousNkubli, Samuel Laushugno, ObettaChinedu T. Hysterosalpingography: A Re-Emerging Study in Health Care Transformation. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JMDS) Volume 13, Issue 12 Ver. VII (Dec.2014): 37-40.

Mgbor S.O. Patterns of Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Findings in Gyneacology patients in Enugu, Nigerian Medical Journal 2006; 47:14-16.

Ezegwui H.U., Mgbor S.O, Ikeme A.C, Patients Journal of Obstetrics and Gyneacology.2001. 18:14-16.

Ghazi A, Saddique M.S., Saddique N, Jabbar S. Tehmina Ali, Sunita Jaipal, Pakistan Journal of Surgery. 2007 Oct - Dec 23 (4):283-286.

Asaleye C.M., Adetiloye V.A., Oyinlola T.O. Review of HSG reports done for infertility, Nigerian Journal of Health Sciences: 2004, 4:36-39.

Okogbenin S.A., Okepere E.E., Eigbefoh J.I., Ogbo F.O., Okonta P.I., Onuh S.O. Gynaecological indication for abdominal hysterectomy in the university of Benin teaching Hospital. Archieves of Clinical Journal. 2006.1:56-63.

Kawuwa M.B., Maigari A.G., Audu B.M., Indications and implications of hysterectomy in Maiduguri; Kanem Journal of Medical Sciences 2007: 1 (1):20-25.

Crofton M. Gyneacological Imaging. Text book of Radiology and Imaging 7th edition. 2007 Vol-2.

Good clinical treatment in assisted reproduction – An ESHRE position paper. Eur. Soc. Hum. Reprod. 2008- 255.

Johnson N, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Lilford R, Harada T, Hughes E. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003718.

Ezegwui H.U., Mgbor S.O., Ikeme A.C. Patients Journal of Obstetric and Gyneacology. .2001:18:14-16.

Incidence and age distribution of uterine fibroid at FMC owerri. Nigeria. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation therapy. 2012 Nov. Vol. 1 No.3: 25-29.

Akano A.O., Olatunji O.O., Agaja E.O., and Olakoju P.E., Severe Reaction after Buscopan premedication for HSG. Archieves of Nigerian Medicine and Medical Sciences 2009. 1(1): 23-25.

Arsian S.A., Itabeys, Koc C, Var T, Bilge U., Evaluation of infertile Women: HSG, Office hysteroscopy or Hysterography: which is better? Journal of infertility 2004; 4:1-4.

Heun Y. Yuneetal., Hystereosalpingography in infertility Paper Presented at the 74th annual meeting of American Roentgen Ray Society, Montreal, P.Q., Canada, September 1973; 25-28.

Muhammad Usman Aziz, Saleha Anwar. Hysterosalpingographic evaluation of primary and secondary infertility. Pak J Med Sic 2015 Sept-Oct; 31 (5): 1188-1191.

Retrospective analysis of HSG in primary infertility
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i10.04
Published: 2017-10-31
How to Cite
1.
Mishra RK, Dave PK, Jain M, Bhardwaj M, Jain S. Retrospective analysis of HSG in primary infertility. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2017Oct.31 [cited 2024Dec.23];5(10):894-9. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/928
Section
Original Article