Correlation between maternal mid upper arm circumference and neonatal anthropometry

  • Dr Nimisha Rani MD Student, Department of Pediatrics, Pt. JNMMC and Dr BRAMH Raipur (C.G), India
  • Dr. Sharja Phuljhele Professor and Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pt. JNMMC and Dr BRAMH Raipur (C.G), India
  • Dr. Pratima Beck Associate Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Pt. JNMMC and Dr BRAMH Raipur (C.G), India
Keywords: Anthropometry, Infantometer, LBW, MUAC

Abstract

Introduction: An infant’s birth weight has been identified as the best marker of optimal fetal growth and development. Maternal anthropometry (weight, height and Mid-Upper Arm Circumference) have been identified to influence an infant’s birth weight and length. If MUAC can be established as a surrogate marker for neonatal anthropometric parameters it will help to plan the timely intervention for improvement of health of pregnant female.

Aim: To study the correlation between maternal mid upper arm circumference and neonatal anthropometry.

Material and Methods: A cross sectional study conducted in Dr. B R Ambedkar Memorial Hospital & Pt. JNM Medical college Raipur, Chhattisgarh since January 2015 to September 2016. Sample size was 232. Materials like weighing machine, measuring tape, Infantometer, were used. Data was expressed as percentage and correlation was established using Spearman's chi square test (p<0.05). Data was analyzed using SSPS (version 16.0).

Result: Significant correlation exists between maternal MUAC and birth Weight and length of neonates. Low birth weight is higher in female neonates. Birth length is higher in male neonates. MUAC of mother is a good predictor of risk of low birth weight as compared with other classic anthropometric measurements.

Conclusion: Maternal MUAC is a significant predictor of neonatal anthropometry and can be used instead of pre- pregnancy weight to assess maternal nutritional status especially in resource poor setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Johnson AA, Knight ME, Edwards HC, Oyemade JU, Cole JO, Westney SL, Lovyea H, JonesS. Dietary Intakes, Anthropometric Measurements and Pregnancy Outcomes. Journal of Nutrition 1994, 86(2):1133-35.

Elshibly EM, Schmalisch G. Biomedical Centre of Public Health 8: 244 doi; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2F1471-2458-8-244.

World Health Organization (WHO). Maternal Anthropometry And Pregnancy Outcomes, A WHO Collaborative Study. Bulletin of WHO OMS. 73s: 1-96.

Ricalde AE, Velásquez-Meléndez G, Tanaka AC, de Siqueira AA. Mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women and its relation to birth weight. Rev Saude Publica. 1998 Apr;32(2):112-7.

Heiger ML, Luke B,Vande Ven C, Nugent C. Mid upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) Changes in Late Pregnancy Predict Fetal Growth in Twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics 2005. 8(3):267-270.

Khadivzadeh T. Mid upper arm and calf circumferences as indicators of nutritional status in women of reproductive age. Eastern Mediterranean health Journal 2002; 8(4/5): 612-18.

International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) (2007) National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India. Mumbai: IIPS.

United Nations Children’s Fund(UNICEF) (2008) The state of the world’s children 2008: Child survival. New York: UNICEF, Available: http://www.unicef.org/sowc08/docs/sowc08.pdf. Accessed Aug2016.

Vahdaninia M, Tavafian SS, Montazeri A. Correlates of low birth weight in term pregnancies: a retrospective study from Iran. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2008 Apr 19;8:12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-8-12.

Mohanty C, Prasad R, Srikanth Reddy A, Ghosh JK, Singh TB, Das BK. Maternal anthropometry as predictors of low birth weight. J Trop Pediatr. 2006 Feb;52(1):24-9. Epub 2005 Jun 24.

Okereke CE, Anyaehie UB, Dim CC, Iyare EE, Nwagha UI. Evaluation of some anthropometric indices for the diagnosis of obesity in pregnancy in Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. Afr Health Sci. 2013 Dec;13(4):1034-40. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v13i4.25.

Ververs M, Antierens A, Sackl A, Staderini N, Captier V. Which anthropometric indicators identify a pregnant woman as acutely malnourished and predict adverse birth outcomes in a humanitarian context? PLOS curr. 2013 June; 5:PMC 3682760.

Islam MM, Kamruzaman M, Elahi MT, Ashrafuzzaman M, Azhar BS. Association of maternal body mass index (BMI) and mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) and birth weight of newborn in the southwest region of Bangladesh. Int J Food Nutri Sci 2104; 3(1):1-4.

Ricalde AE, Velásquez-Meléndez G, Tanaka AC, de Siqueira AA. Mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women and its relation to birth weight. Rev Saude Publica. 1998 Apr;32(2):112-7.

de Onis M, Yip R, Mei Z. The development of MUAC-for-age reference data recommended by a WHO Expert Committee. Bull World Health Organ. 1997;75(1):11-8.

Correlation between maternal mid upper arm circumference and neonatal anthropometry
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i07.10
Published: 2017-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Rani N, Phuljhele S, Beck P. Correlation between maternal mid upper arm circumference and neonatal anthropometry. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2017Jul.31 [cited 2024Apr.24];5(7):717-24. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/900
Section
Original Article