Imaging evaluation of renal masses

  • Dr. Jaswinder Kaur Mohi Associate Professor Radiodiagnosis GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Sunita Kajal Consultant, Radiologist , SGHC Hospital, Sohana, Punjab, India
  • Dr. Jasvir Singh Junior Resident, Radiodiagnosis, GMC Patiala, Punjab, India
Keywords: Renal mass, RCC, USG, CT scan

Abstract

Introduction: This article demonstrate the imaging characteristics of cystic and solid renal masses, along with a summary of identified imaging criteria that may be of use to differentiate masses that are more likely to be benign from those that are more likely to be malignant.

Aim and Objectives: To evaluate the patients with renal cancer by ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) and to compare the findings of USG and CT.

Material and Methods: Present study was conducted on 60 patients presented with renal masses, initially evaluated with ultrasonography (USG) and later on characterization of the mass was done by using computed tomography (CT).

Results: CT has higher sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) on correlation with USG.

Conclusion: CT is capable of detecting tumor invasion of perinephric fat and adjacent muscles, which cannot usually seen by ultrasound. While both CT and ultrasound demonstrate venous and retroperitoneal tumor extension, CT is more reliable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowen DR and Case JT. Imaging of Small Renal Masses: A Medical Success Story. AJR 2000;175:945-55.

Mittal MK, Sureka B. Solid renal masses in adults. Ijri 2017: 122.173.14.103.

Sankineni S, Brown A, Cieciera M, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Imaging of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol. 2016 Mar;34(3):147-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Sacco E, Pinto F, Totaro A, D'Addessi A, Racioppi M, Gulino G, Volpe A, Marangi F, D'Agostino D, Bassi P. Imaging of renal cell carcinoma: state of the art and recent advances. Urol Int. 2011;86(2):125-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000322724. Epub 2010 Dec 11.

Bajwa RPS, Sandhu P, Aulakh BS, Sandhu JS, Saggar K, Ahluwalia A. Helical CT Evaluation of Renal Mass Lesions: A Prospective Study. Jiacm 2007;8(3):262-4.

Hatimota P, Vashist S, Aggarwal K, Kapoor A, Gupta NP. Spectrum of US and CT findings in renal neoplasms with pathological correlation. Ind J Radiol Imag 2005;15:1:117-25.

Lindblad P. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Surg. 2004;93(2):88-96.

Lipworth L, Tarone RE, McLaughlin JK. The epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2353-8.

Ng CS, Wood CG, Silverman PM, Tannir NM, Tamboli P, Sandler CM. Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, staging, and surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Oct;191(4):1220-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3568.

Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L, Bookbinder MJ, Glickman MG, Richter J, Hammers L, Taylor C, Rosenfield AT. Detection of renal masses: sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology. 1988 Nov;169(2):363-5.

Levitt RG, Geisse GG, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Evens RG, Koehler RE, Jost RG. Complementary use of ultrasound and computed tomography in studies of the pancreas and kidney. Radiology. 1978 Jan;126(1):149-52.

Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Levitt RG, Geisse G. Computed tomography of the kidney. Radiology. 1977 Aug;124(2):359-70.

King DL. Renal ultrasonography: an aid in the clinical evaluation of renal masses. Radiology. 1972 Dec;105(3):633-40.

Dachille G, Erinnio M, Cardo G, Maselli FP, Vestita G, Ludovico GM. Detection rate of ultrasound vs CT scan in clinical staging accuracy of renal tumors pT1NxMx. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2005 Jun;77(3):149-50.

Kostakopoulos A, Antonopoulos P, Drosos C, Stavropoulos N, Picramenos D, Deliveliotis C. Small lesions of the kidney: CT evaluation comparison with ultrasound. Acta Urol Belg. 1990;58(3):73-85.

Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB, Linehan WM, Thakore KN, Walther MM. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1996 Mar;198(3):785-8.

Curry NS, Cochran ST, Bissada NK. Cystic renal masses: accurate Bosniak classification requires adequate renal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):339-42.

Weyman PJ, McClennan BL, Lee JK, Stanley RJ. CT of calcified renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Jun;138(6):1095-9.

Levine E, Maklad NF, Rosenthal SJ, Lee KR, Weigel J. Comparison of computed tomography and ultrasound in abdominal staging of renal cancer. Urology. 1980 Sep;16(3):317-22.

Zagoria RJ, Wolfman NT, Karstaedt N, Hinn GC, Dyer RB, Chen YM. CT features of renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on relation to tumor size. Invest Radiol. 1990 Mar;25(3):261-6.

Imaging evaluation of renal masses
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2017.i06.14
Published: 2017-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Kaur Mohi J, Kajal S, Singh J. Imaging evaluation of renal masses. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2017Jun.30 [cited 2024Apr.27];5(6):635-43. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/890
Section
Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)