Comparative study on non descent vaginal hysterectomy verses abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions

  • Dr Kshma Chandrakar Assistant Professor, L.N. Medical College J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal, MP, India
  • Dr Neelam Singh Associate Professor, L.N. Medical College J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal, MP, India
  • Dr Surekha Charla Senior Resident, L.N. Medical College J.K. Hospital, Kolar Road, Bhopal, MP, India
Keywords: Non Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy, Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Hospital stay, Pain scores

Abstract

Objectives: To determine superiority, safety and effectiveness of vaginal over abdominal route of hysterectomy and to show that vaginal hysterectomy requires shorter duration of surgery, less blood loss, early post operative recovery with early ambulation of the patient, less operative complication & less duration of hospital stay compared to total abdominal hysterectomy.

Methodology: A prospective comparative study conducted among 150 women undergoing hysterectomy for benign uterine condition .Those undergoing non descent vaginal hysterectomy were compared with those undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy.

Results: When we compared NDVH with TAH it was found that it takes less time [86.32±9.74] min ,with lesser blood loss [171.32±36.58]ml as compared to[106.41±15.72]min and [210.45±70.45]ml in abdominal hysterectomy. The pain scores and hospital stay is also favorable in vaginal route.

Conclusion: From our study we conclude that a scar less surgery in the form of NDVH should be preferred by all surgeons as the primary route of perform hysterectomy. Previously considered contraindications for NDVH have now been ruled out.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Drellich MG, Bieber I. The psychologic importance of the uterus and its functions: some psychoanalytic implications of hysterectomy. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 1958 Apr 1;126(4):322-36.

Sheth SS. Vaginal hysterectomy. In: Puri R, Malohatra N. eds. Operative obstetrics and Gynaecology. New Delhi. Jaypee brother’s medical publisher. 2009:499-510.

Goel N, Rajaram S, Ghumman S.eds. Step by Step Non-Descent vaginal hysterectomy. 2nd edtion, New Delhi. Japee brothers medical publishers; 2010:42-62.

Huskisson EC. Visual analogue scales. Pain measurement and assessment. 1983:33-7.

Dewan Rupali, Agarwal Suivani, Manisha, Minocha Bharti, Sen Soumendra K, Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy – An experience, J. Obstet. Gynecol. Ind. Vol. 54, No.4, July/Aug. 2004, Pg.376-378.

Kumar Sushil, Antony ZK, Vaginal hysterectomy for benign nonprolapsed uterus. Intial Experience. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Ind. Vol. 54; No. 1. January/February 2004; Page. 60-63.

Sheth SS. The scope of vaginal hysterectomy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2004 Aug 10;115(2):224-30.

Magos A, Boyiras N, Sinha R, Richardson R, Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996;103:246.

Shailesh Kore, Anjali Sah, Aparna Hedge. Bisection, myomectomy and coring in vaginal hysterectomy of large uterus. Dept. of Obstetics and Gynaecology, LTMMC and LTMG Hospital, Sion, Mumbai: bhj oct 1999:4104;706.

Doucette RC, Sharp HT, Alder SC, Challenging generally accepted contraindication to vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1386-9; discussion 1390-1.

Kammerer-Doak D, Mao J. Vaginal hysterectomy with and without morcellation: the University of New Mexico hospital's experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):560-3.

Taylor S, Romero A, Qualls C, Rogers R. Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. The American Journal of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. 1996;162:994-998.

Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S, Bosuk M, Montz F. Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;86(1):60-4.

Unger JB. Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with a moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;180(6 Pt 1):1337-44.

Pradeep Kumar Garg, D Deka, Neena Malhotra. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for Benign Condition. A better proposition than abdominal hysterectomy. Obst. & Gynaec. June 2002. Today. Vol VII, No. 6.

Dr. Abha Singh, Shweta Bansal, Vaginal hysterectomy for non prolapsed uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol India Vol 56, No 2: March/April 2006;152-55.

Tariq Miskry and Adam Magos, Randomized prospective double-blind comparison of abdominal versus hysterectomy in women without utero vaginal prolapsed. Acta Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;82:351-358.

Sawkar, Abhinandan Kumar H, Vaginal hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy in non descent uterus-a comparative study, D space at RGUHS, Karnataka, Bangalore, Apr-2009;22-80.

Liu Sui Ling, LI Xiao Mao, Clinical analysis of transvaginal hysterectomy in 50 cases with uterine myoma. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Third Affiliated Hospital. Sun Vat Sen University, China. Chinese Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology;2005:02. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1386-9; discussion 1390-1.

Comparative study on non descent vaginal hysterectomy verses abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i11.29
Published: 2016-11-30
How to Cite
1.
Chandrakar K, Singh N, Charla S. Comparative study on non descent vaginal hysterectomy verses abdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2016Nov.30 [cited 2024Nov.22];4(11):2071-6. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/761
Section
Original Article