Distribution of Coronary Artery Anomalies and Their Evaluation with Different Imaging Modalities

  • Dr Abhishek Raval Assistant professor, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre (UNMICRC), Ahmedabad, India
  • Dr Nikhil Jadhav Assistant professor, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre (UNMICRC), Ahmedabad, India
  • Dr Jayesh Prajapati Professor in Cardiology, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre (UNMICRC), Ahmedabad, India
  • Dr Jayesh Rawal Interventional cardiologist, Ahmedabad, India
  • Dr Rajiv Garg Interventional cardiologist, SPS Hospitals, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Dr Komal Shah Research Officer, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre (UNMICRC), Ahmedabad, India
  • Dr Iva Patel Research fellow, U.N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre (UNMICRC), Ahmedabad, India
Keywords: Coronary artery anomalies, Echocardiography, Coronary Angiography, Computed Tomography, Radiation Exposure

Abstract

Introduction: Coronary artery anomalies (CAA) are diverse abnormalities.

Methods: A retrospective review of coronary imaging of 17,245 patients over 2 years was performed. Patients with CAA detected on echocardiography, invasive coronary angiography (CAG) and multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) were compared.

Results: CAAs were detected in 257 patients (1.49%). Prevalence were: absent left main trunk- 0.319%, anomalous coronary artery from opposite sinus (ACAOS)- 0.516%, coronary fistulae- 0.203%, myocardial bridge- 0.093%, malignant anomalies- 0.3%. The commonest CAA was absent left main trunk. The yield of echocardiography negatively correlated with age (r=-0.6). CAG and MDCTA were equal (p=1) for detection of absent left main trunk. CAG had low sensitivity (58.3%) and MDCTA was better than it (p<0.01) for detection of abnormal high origin. For ACAOS, detection by both were not different (p=0.5) but the course was delineated better with MDCTA than with CAG (p=0.05). Both were equal for detection of intramyocardial course (p=0.5). However, MDCTA delineated its course better than CAG (p<0.01). Echocardiography had 93% sensitivity for fistula in those <12 years in age. Radiation exposure with CAG, 7.3 ± 2mSv, was lower than that with MDCTA, 14.5 ± 3mSv (p<0.01). It correlated with CAA score (r=0.3), with CAG but not with MDCTA. Contrast exposure correlated with CAA score (r=0.4) for adults with CAG but not with MDCTA.

Conclusion: Echocardiography reliably detects CAAs in children. CAG and MDCTA are comparable for detection of most CAA. MDCTA delineates the course better than CAG. For MDCTA, radiation exposure is not correlated with complexity of CAA in contrast to that with CAG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kacmaza F, Ozbulbulb NI, Alyana O, Madena O, Demira AD, Balbaya Y, Erbaya AR , Ataka R, Senena K, Olcerb T, Ilkayc E. Imaging of coronary artery anomalies: the role of multidetector computed tomography. Coron Artery Dis. 2008 May; 19(3):203–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282f528f1.

Alexander RW, Griffith GC. Anomalies of the coronary arteries and their clinical significance. Circulation. 1956 Nov; 14(5):800–5.doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.14.5.800.

Engel HJ, Torres C, Page HL Jr. Major variations in anatomical origin of the coronary arteries: angiographic observations in 4,250 patients without associated congenital heart disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1975;1(2):157-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810010205.

Kaku B, Kanaya H, Ikeda M, Uno Y, Fujita S, Kato F, Oka T. Acute inferior myocardial infarction and coronary artery spasm in a patient with an anomalous origin of the right coronary arteryfrom the left sinus of Valsalva. Jpn Circ J. 2000 Aug; 64(8):641–3.doi: https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.64.641.

Benge W, Martins JB, Funk DC. Morbidity associated with anomalous origin of the right coronary artery from the left sinus of Valsalva. Am Heart J. 1980 Jan; 99(1):96–100.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(80)90319-1.

Basso C, Maron BJ, Corrado D, Thiene G. Clinical profile of congenital coronary artery anomalies with origin from the wrong aortic sinus leading to sudden in young competitive athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000 May; 35(6): 1493–501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00566-0.

Ropers D, Moshage W, Daniel WG, Jessl J, Gottwik M, Achenbach S. Visualization of coronary artery anomalies and their anatomic course by contrast-enhanced electron beam tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction. Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jan; 87(2):193–7.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01315-1.

Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies: an entity in search of an identity. Circulation. 2007 Mar 13;115(10):1296-305.doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.618082.

Rigatelli G, Rigatelli A, Cominato S, PaninS, Nghia NT, Faggian G. A clinical-angiographic risk scoring system for coronary artery anomalies. Asian Cardiovascular & Thoracic Annals. 2012; 20(3) 299–303.doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492312437880.

Angelini P. Coronary artery anomalies--current clinical issues: definitions, classification, incidence, clinical relevance, and treatment guidelines. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002; 29(4):271–8.

de Jonge GJ, van Ooijen PMA, Piers LH, Dikkers R, Tio RA, Willems TP, van den Heuvel AFM, Zijlstra F, Oudkerk M. Visualization of anomalous coronary arteries on dual-source computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2008 Nov; 18(11): 2425-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1110-y.

Yamanaka O, Hobbs RE. Coronary artery anomalies in 126,595 patients undergoing coronary arteriography. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990; 21(1): 28–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810210110.

Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EvP, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. EUR 16262 EN. 1999. http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/mainindex.htm.

Topaz O, DeMarchena EJ, Perin E, Sommer LS, Mallon SM, Chahine RA. Anomalous coronary arteries: angiographic findings in 80 patients. Int J Cardiol. 1992 Feb;34(2):129-38.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5273(92)90148-v.

Wilkins CE, Betancourt B, Mathur VS, Massumi A, De Castro CM, Garcia E, Hall RJ. Coronary artery anomalies: a review of more than 10,000 patients from the Clayton Cardiovascular Laboratories. Tex Heart Inst J. 1988; 15(3):166–73.

Cademartiri F, La Grutta L, Malagò R, Alberghina F, Meijboom WB, Pugliese F, Maffei E, Palumbo AA, Aldrovandi A, Fusaro M, Brambillia V, Coruzzi P, Midiri M, Mollet NRA, Krestin GP. Prevalence of anatomical variants and coronary anomalies in 543 consecutive patients studied with 64-slice CT coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. 2008 Apr; 18(4):781-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0821-9.

Lipsett J, Cohle SD, Berry PJ, Russell G, Byard RW. Anomalous Coronary Arteries: A Multicenter Pediatric Autopsy Study. Pediatr Pathol. 1994 Mar-Apr; 14(2):287-300.doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/15513819409024261.

Frescura C, Basso C, Thiene G, Corrado D, Pennelli T, Angelini A, Daliento L. Anomalous Origin of Coronary Arteries and Risk of Sudden Death: a Study Based on an Autopsy Population of Congenital Heart Disease. Hum Pathol. 1998 Jul; 29(7):689-95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(98)90277-5.

Davis JA, Cecchin F, Jones TK, Portman MA. Major Coronary Artery Anomalies in a Pediatric Population: Incidence and Clinical Importance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Feb; 37(2): 593-7.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01136-0.

Harikrishnan S, Jacob SP, Tharakkan I, Titus T, Kumar VK, Bhat A, Sivasankaran S, Bimal F, Moorthy KM, Kumar RP. Congenital Coronary Anomalies of Origin and Distribution in Adults: a Coronary Arteriographic Study. Indian Heart J. 2002 May-Jun; 54(3):271-275.

Gianluca R, Giorgio D, Paolo R, Daniela B, Daniele R, Attilio B, Gabriele L, Giorgio R. Congenital Coronary Artery Anomalies Angiographic Classification Revisited. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2003 Oct; 19(5):361-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025806908289.

Aydinlar A, Cicek D, Senturk T, Gemici K, Serdar OA, Kazazoglu AR, Kumbay E, Cordan J. Primary Congenital Anomalies of the Coronary Arteries: a Coronary Angiographic Study in Western Turky. Int Heart J. 2005 Jan; 46(1): 97-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.46.97.

von Ziegler F, Pilla M, McMullan L, Panse P, Leber AW, Wilke N, Becker A. Visualization of anomalous origin and course of coronary arteries in 748 consecutive symptomatic patients by 64-slice computed tomography angiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009 Dec; 9: 54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-9-54.

Ten Kate GJ, Weustink AC, de Feyter PJ. Coronary artery anomalies detected by MSCT-coronary angiography in the adult. Neth Heart J. 2008 Nov;16(11):369-75.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03086181.

Koşar P, Ergun E, Oztürk C, Koşar U. Anatomic variations and anomalies of the coronary arteries: 64-slice CT angiographic appearance. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009 Dec;15(4):275-83. doi: https://doi.org/10.4261/1305-3825.dir.2550-09.1. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

Yildiz A, Okcun B, Peker T, Arslan C, Olcay A, Bulent Vatan M. Prevalence of coronary artery anomalies in 12,457 adult patients who underwent coronary angiography. Clin Cardiol. 2010 Dec;33(12):E60-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20588.

Eid AH, Itani Z, Al-Tannir M, Sayegh S, Samaha A. Primary Congenital Anomalies of the Coronary Arteries and Relation to Atherosclerosis: an Angiographic Study in Lebanon. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2009 Oct; 4:58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-4-58.

Zhang LJ, Yang GF, Huang W, Zhou CS, Chen P, Lu GM. Incidence of anomalous origin of coronary artery in 1879 Chinese adults on dual-source CT angiography. Neth Heart J. 2010 Oct;18(10):466-70.doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf03091817.

Karabay KO, Yildiz AM, Geceer G, Uysal E, Bagirtan B. The Incidence of Coronary Anomalies on Routine Coronary Computed Tomography Scans. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2013 Nov; 24(9):351-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2013-066.

Ghadri JR, Kazakauskaite E, Braunschweig S, Burger IA, Frank M, Fiechter M, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Templin C, Gaemperli O, Luscher TF, Schmied C, Kaufmann PA. Congenital Coronary Anomalies Detected by Coronary Computed Tomography Compared to Invasive Coronary Angiography. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2014 July; 14:81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2261-14-81.

Altin C, Kanyilmaz S, Koc S, Gursoy YC, Bal U, Aydinalp A, Yildirir A, Muderrisoglu H. Coronary Anatomy, Anatomic Variations and Anomalies: a Retrospective Coronary Angiography Study. Singapore Med J. 2015 Jun; 56(6):339-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2014193.

Gräni C, Benz DC, Schmied C, Vontobel J, Possner M, Clerc OF, Mikulicic F, Stehli J, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA, Buechel RR. Prevalence and characteristics of coronary artery anomalies detected by coronary computed tomography angiography in 5634 consecutive patients in a single centre in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2016 Apr; 146:w14294. doi: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2016.14294.

Armsby LR, Keane JF, Sherwood MC, Forbess JM, Perry SB, Lock JE. Management of coronary artery fistulae: patient selection and results of transcatheter closure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Mar; 39(6):1026–32.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01742-4.

Manghat NE, Morgan-Hughes GJ, Marshall AJ, Roobottom CA. Multidetector row computed tomography: imaging congenital coronary artery anomalies in adults. Heart. 2005 Dec; 91(12):1515–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.065979.

Fernandes F, Alam M, Smith S, Khaja F. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in identifying anomalous coronary arteries. Circulation. 1993 Dec; 88(6):2532–40.doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.88.6.2532.

Bluemke DA, Achenbach S, Budoff M, Gerber TC, Gersh B, Hillis LD, Hundley WG, Manning WJ, Printz BF, Stuber M, Woodard PK. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation. 2008 July; 118(5):586–606. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.189695.

Memisoglu E, Hobikoglu G, Tepe MS, Norgaz T, Bilsel T. Congenital Coronary Anomalies in Adults: Comparison of Anatomic course visualization by catheter angiography and electron beam CT. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005 Sep; 66(1):34-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20444.

Shi H, Aschoff AJ, Brambs HJ, Hoffmann MH. Multislice CT imaging of anomalous coronary arteries. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec;14(12):2172-81. Epub 2004 Oct 15.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2490-2.

Schmid M, Achenbach S, Ludwig J, Baum U, Anders K, Pohle K, Daniel WG, Ropers D. Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2006 Aug; 111(3):430–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.08.027.

Datta J, White CS, Gilkeson RC, Meyer CA, Kansal S, Jani ML, Arildsen RC, Read K. Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology. 2005 Jun; 235(3):812–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2353040314.

Schmitt R, Froehner S, Brunn J, Wagner M, Brunner H, Cherevatyy O, Gietzen F, Christopoulos G, Kerber S, Fellner F. Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: imaging with contrast-enhanced, multidetector computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun; 15(6):1110–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2707-z.

Sato Y, Inoue F, Matsumoto N, Tani S, Takayama T, Yoda S, Kunimasa, T, Ishii N, Uchiyama T, Saito S, Tanaka H, Furuhashi S, Takahashi M, Koyama Y. Detection of anomalous origins of the coronary artery by means of multislice computed tomography. Circ J. 2005 Mar; 69(3):320–4.doi: https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.69.320.

van Ooijen PM, Dorgelo J, Zijlstra F, Oudkerk M. Detection, visualization and evaluation of anomalous coronary anatomy on 16-slice multidetector-row CT. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec;14(12):2163-71. Epub 2004 Sep 28.doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2493-z.

Berbarie RF, Dockery WD, Johnson KB, Rosenthal RL, Stoler RC, Schussler JM. Use of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for the diagnosis of anomalous coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Aug; 98(3):402–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.046.

Deibler AR, Kuzo RS, Vohringer M, Page EE, Safford RE, Patron JN, Lane GE, Morin RL, Gerber TC. Imaging of congenital coronary anomalies with multislice computed tomography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 Aug; 79(8):1017–23.doi: https://doi.org/10.4065/79.8.1017.

.Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, Poon M, Carr JC, Gerstad NA, Gillam LD, Hodgson JM, Kim RJ, Lesser JR, Martin ET, Messer JV, Redberg RF, Rubin GD, Rumsfeld JS, Taylor AJ, Weigold WG, Woodard PK, Brindis RG, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, Wolk MJ, Allen JM. Accf/acr/scct/scmr/asnc/nasci/scai/sir 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: A report of the american college of cardiology foundation quality strategic directions committee appropriateness criteria working group, american college of radiology, society of cardiovascular computed tomography, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance, american society of nuclear cardiology, north american society for cardiac imaging, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of interventional radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct; 48(7):1475-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.003.

McConnell MV, Ganz P, Selwyn AP, Li W, Edelman RR, Manning WJ. Identification of anomalous coronary arteries and their anatomic course by magnetic resonance coronary angiography. Circulation. 1995 Dec 1;92(11):3158-62.doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.92.11.3158.

Harris MA, Weinberg PM, Shin DC, Whitehead KK, Gillespie MJ, Dori Y, Spray TL, Fogel MA. Virtual Angioscopy Identifies Abnormal Coronary Ostial Morphology in Patients With Anomalous Origin of a Coronary Artery From the Contralateral Sinus of Valsalva. Circulation. 2011; 124: A16138.

Distribution of Coronary Artery Anomalies and Their Evaluation with Different Imaging Modalities
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i10.17
Published: 2019-10-31
How to Cite
1.
Raval A, Jadhav N, Prajapati J, Rawal J, Garg R, Shah K, Patel I. Distribution of Coronary Artery Anomalies and Their Evaluation with Different Imaging Modalities. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2019Oct.31 [cited 2024Dec.14];4(10):1807-19. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/723
Section
Original Article