Retrospective analysis of inguinal hernia repair by various methods in a teaching institute

  • Dr. Sushil D Akruwala Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, GCS Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre Ahmedabad , Gujarat, India
  • Dr. Vidhyasagar M Sharma Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, GCS Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre Ahmedabad , Gujarat, India
Keywords: Inguinal hernia, Meshplasty, Lichtenstein

Abstract

Background / Aim: Inguinal hernia is a very common problem. Surgical repair is the current approach. This original article aims to study various methods of inguinal hernia repair over a span of 3 years in a teaching hospital.

Methods: All the patients operated electively for uncomplicated inguinal hernia from 2010 to 2012 were selected for the study. They were operated by various methods and followed till 2013.

Results: There were total 260 cases of inguinal hernia repair during study period. 210 cases were operated by Lichtenstein method of hernioplasty, 27 by Preperitoneal meshplasty and 23 by TEP.

Conclusion: Lichtenstein repair and endoscopic/laparoscopic techniques have similar efficacy. It is found that Lichtenstein’s tension free repair is standard and cost effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Fitzgibbons RJ, Richards AT, Quinn TH. Open hernia repair. In: Souba WS, Mitchell P, Fink MP, Jurkovich GJ, Kaiser LR, Pearce WH, Pemberton JH, Soper NJ, editors. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia, U.S.A: Decker Publishing Inc; 2002. pp. 828–849.

2. Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1154–1161. [pubMed]

3. George H Sakorafas*, Ioannis Halikias, Christos Nissotakis, Nikolaos Kotsifopoulos,Alexios Stavrou, Constantinos Antonopoulos and George A Kassaras. Open tension free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique.BMC Surg. 2001,1:3,doi:10.1186/1471-2482-1-3.

4. Lau H, Patil NG, Yuen WK Day-case endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty versus open Lichtenstein hernioplasty for unilateral primary inguinal hernia in males: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):76-81.

5. Reid I, Devlin HB. Testicular atrophy as a consequence of inguinal hernia repair. BJS. 2005;81:91–93. [pubMed]

6. Ibingira CB. Long term complications of inguinal hernia repairs. East Afr Med J. 1999;76(7):396–399. [pubMed]

7. GE Wantz (2000) Testicular atrophy and chronic residual neuralgia as a risk of hernioplasty after inguinal surg. Cl.N. Am 13(3):571–581. [pubMed]

8. Hendry WF. Testicular Epididymal and vassal injuries. BJU Int. 2000;86:344–348. [pubMed]

9. Fenoglio ME, Bermas HR, Haun WE, Moore JT. Inguinal hernia repair: results using an open preperitoneal approach. Hernia. 2005 May;9(2):160-1. [pubMed]

10. Kulacoglu H. Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients. Hippokratia.2001;15(3):223–231. [pubMed]

11. Nienhuijs S, Staal E, Keemers-Gels M, Rosman C, Strobbe L Pain after open preperitoneal repair versus Lichtenstein repair: a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2007 Sep;31(9):1751-7; discussion 1758-9. [pubMed]

12. Karthikesalingam A, Markar SR, Holt PJ, Praseedom RK. Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. Br J Surg.2010;97:4–11. [pubMed]

13. Bay-Nielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study. Ann Surg. 2001;233:1–7. [pubMed]

14. Callesen T, Beck K, Kehlet H. Prospective study of chronic pain after groin hernia repair. Br J Surg.1999;86:1528–1531. [pubMed]

15. Poobalan AS, Bruce J, King PM, Chambers WA, Koukowski ZH, Smith WCS. Chronic pain and quality of life following open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1122–1126. [pubMed]

16. Kurzer M, Belsham PA, Kark AE. The Lichtenstein repair. Surg Clin North Am. 1998;78:1025–1046. [pubMed]

17. Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias under local anesthesia. Ann Surg. 1996;223:249–252.

18. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK .Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):850-6.

19. Hynes DM, Stroupe KT, Luo P, Giobbie-Hurder A, Reda D, Kraft M . Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:447–457.

20. McCormack K, Wake B, Perez J, Fraser C, Cook J, McIntosh E, Vale L, Grant A. Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1–203 iii-iv.

21. Eklund A, Carlsson P, Rosenblad A, Montgomery A, Bergkvist L, Rudberg C. Swedish Multicentre Trial of Inguinal Hernia Repair by Laparoscopy (SMIL) study group. Long-term costminimization analysis comparing laparoscopic with open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg.2010;97:765–771.

22. Paajanen H, Varjo R. Ten-year audit of Lichtenstein hernioplasty under local anaesthesia performed by surgical residents. BMC Surg. 2010;10:24. [pubMed]

23. Gainant A. Where does laparoscopy fit in the treatment of inguinal hernia in 2003?. J Chir [Paris]. 2003 Jun; 140 [3]:171-5.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2013.i05.05
Published: 2013-12-31
How to Cite
1.
D Akruwala S, M Sharma V. Retrospective analysis of inguinal hernia repair by various methods in a teaching institute. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2013Dec.31 [cited 2024Jul.3];1(5):240-4. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/42
Section
Original Article