A prospective study of clinical profile, management and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcer in northern India: a tertiary hospital experience
Abstract
Introduction: This is a prospective study of patients of adult age group admitted with clinical features suggestive of perforated peptic ulcer. The study comprised of 70 patients. In our study we aimed to provide a complete epidemiological, clinical and management description of Peptic ulcer Perforation in adult age group patients.
Methods: all the patients who were undergoing exploratory laparotomy were taken. A detailed history, thorough clinical examination and necessary routine blood investigations and X-ray chest and flat plate abdomen in standing position were performed in each case.
Results: Perforated peptic ulcer is more common in male in the age group 30-50 years and most common presenting symptom was pain abdomen. Smoking and alcohol beverage consumption were risk factors in most cases (78.5%) in causation of perforation. Most common site of ulcer perforation is duodenal 1st part (94.3%). Out of 63 patients in whom perforation size was <=1cm, 10 (15%) were in shock. Whereas 2 were in shock out of 7 patients with perforation size >1 cm. Size of perforation is directly proportional to the quantity of peritoneal fluid.
Conclusion: Peptic ulcer perforation in present scenario is a disease of relatively younger age group. Rural background, poor socioeconomic status and occupation like farmer and labourer seem to contribute to causation of peptic ulcer perforation. The most important risk factors for the determination of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease are duration of perforation (especially if >24 hrs), condition of the patient at the time of presentation, size of perforation as well as preoperative management.
Downloads
References
2. Sivri B. Trends in peptic ulcer pharmacotherapy. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Feb;18(1):23-31. [PubMed]
3. Ramakrishnan K, Salinas RC. Peptic ulcer disease. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Oct 1;76(7):1005-12. [PubMed]
4. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O'Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, Hunt R, Rokkas T, Vakil N, Kuipers EJ. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut. 2007 Jun;56(6):772-81. Epub 2006 Dec 14. [PubMed]
5. Boey J, Wong J. Perforated duodenal ulcers. World J Surg. 1987 Jun;11(3):319-24. [PubMed]
6. Gupta S. Perforated peptic ulcer. Incidence, treatment and mortality. Int Surg. 1975 Oct;60(10):532-3. [PubMed]
7. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M. Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1299-310.
8. DeBakey ME: Acute perforated gastroduodenal ulceration. A statistical analysis and review of the literature. Surgery, 1940, 8: 852-884.
9. Jordan PH Jr, Korompai FL. Evolvement of a new treatment for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976 Mar;142(3):391-5. [PubMed]
10. Svanes C. Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg. 2000 Mar;24(3):277-83. [PubMed]
11. R M whatkins, Sadler TW William, Willans: Langman’s medical embryology 7th Edition, 1995; 247-253.
12. CAREVALI JF, REMINE WH. Radical versus conservative surgical management of acute perforated peptic ulcer. Postgrad Med. 1962 Aug;32:119-26.
13. Bharati C Ramesh et al: Immediate definitive surgery in perforated duodenal ulcer: A comparative study, between surgery and simple closure. Indian J. Surg,1996;257-279.
14. Tsugawa K, Koyanagi N, Hashizume M, Tomikawa M, Akahoshi K, Ayukawa K, Wada H, Tanoue K, Sugimachi K. The therapeutic strategies in performing emergency surgery for gastroduodenal ulcer perforation in 130 patients over 70 years of age. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 Jan-Feb;48(37):156-62.
15. Boey J, Lee NW, Koo J, Lam PH, Wong J, Ong GB. Immediate definitive surgery for perforated duodenal ulcers: a prospective controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1982 Sep;196(3):338-44.