A study of paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a tertiary care center

  • Dr Arvind joshi Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital Bhopal, MP, India
  • Dr Punit Tiwari Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital Bhopal, MP, India
  • Dr Roshan Chanchlani Associate Professor, Deparment of Surgery, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital Bhopal, MP, India
Keywords: PCNL (Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy), Stone Disease, Congenital Anomaly

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the technique of Paediatric Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in terms of safety, outcome and efficacy in age group 1 to 14 years.

Material & Methods: The observational study was done from October 2011 to October 2014 in Chirayu Medical College Bhopal. 25 cases of renal stone in paediatric age group were admitted in our hospital and evaluated for size of the stone, number of stones, associated congenital anomalies and complications. PCNL was done by standard technique.

Results: A total number of 25 children were operated. Sex distribution in our study was male 15 and female 10, most of the patients were of age group 10-14 years 15(60%). Most of the children15(60%) had large stones >2cm stones and small stone was seen in 6(24%) cases. Malrotated kidney having stone was seen in 8(32%) cases. Complications as fever and haematuria was observed in 1 (4%) case. The maximum sheath size used inchildren was 24 F. Out of 25 children, only one patient required blood transfusion.

Conclusion: Paediatric PCNL is safe procedure in expert and experienced hands. Minimal invasive procedures are beneficial in paediatric age group because of longer life expectancy andmore riskof recurrence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. SaricaK.Paediatricurolithiasis:etiology,specific pathogenesis and medical treatment.Urol Res 2006;34(2):96-101. [PubMed]

2. EsenT.KrautschikA,AlkenD.Treauiient update on pediatric urolithiasis .World journal Urology 997;15:1295.

3. KramolowskyEV,WilloughbyBL.LoeningSA.Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in children.JUrol 1987;137:934-41. [PubMed]

4. Woodside JR .Stevens GF,Stark GL et al.Percutaneous stone removal in children.JUrol 1985;134:1166-1167. [PubMed]

5. SamadL,AquilS,ZaidiZ.Paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy;setting new frontiers.BJUInt 2006;97:359-63.

6. BayrakO,SeckinerI,ErturhanS,Comparative analyses of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery in paediatric urinary stone disease.PaediatSurgInt 2012;28:1025-1029. [PubMed]

7. Schuster TK,SmaidoneMC,AverchTD,Percutaneousnephrolithotomy in children.Jendourol 2009;23:1699-705. [PubMed]

8. Zeren S, SatarN; Bayazit AK, Payasli K, Ozkeceli ~R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Endourol 2002; 16: 75-78. [PubMed]

9. Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Patel SH, Bapat SO. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex pediatricrenal calculus disease J. Endourol 2004; 18: 23-27. [PubMed]

10. Tekgul S et al.Guidelines on paediatric urology.European association of Urology 2013.Available at http;//uroweb.org/wpcontent/uploads/22-Paediatric-Urology_LR.pdf.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i8.156
Published: 2015-09-30
How to Cite
1.
joshi A, Tiwari P, Chanchlani R. A study of paediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a tertiary care center. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2015Sep.30 [cited 2024Dec.23];3(8):832-5. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/330
Section
Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)