Stapler Haemorroidopexy - our experience in a tertiary care hospital of central India

  • Dr. Anant Kumar Rakhonde Associate Professor, Department of surgery, Chirayu Medical College and hospital, Bhopal, India
  • Dr. Roshan Chanchalani Associate Professor, Department of surgery, Chirayu Medical College and hospital, Bhopal, MP, India
Keywords: Stapler Haemorroidopexy, haemorrhoids, Symptomatic haemorrhoids

Abstract

Background: Symptomatic haemorroids poses a very big issue on the public health. Treatment options for haemorroids is surgery for 2nd, 3rd , 4th degree haemorroids, but due to fear of surgery due to pain patients usually tries to avoid it and later on comes with complications which in turn adds for increased morbidity and mortality. Since stapler haemorroidopexy is claimed to be superior than other available procedures for heamorroids the study is undertaken to evaluate the efficacy in terms of operation time, post-operative pain, hospital stay, return to normal activity and return to work, relapse of symptoms, recurrence and patient satisfaction.

Material and Methods: The Study was done using a circular stapling device for the treatment of Symptomatic haemorrhoids grade 2, 3 and 4 over a period from November 2011 to December 2014 for age group between 22 to 78 yrs of age.

Observations: Total 88 patientswith symptomatic haemorroids who agreed for treatment with stapler surgery for haemorroids were operated. Operative time ranged between 55- 20 min.with mean operative time 36.44 min. Post-op pain measured using Visual analogue scale after aprox. 24 hrs and is in the range of mild pain(0-2) in 82 (93.18%) patients. Post-operative pain: In 4 (4.54%) patients were having VAS between 2-4 and required injection diclofenac sodium analgesic to be added for pain in the regime. 2 patients (2.27%) complaints of unbearable pain and opioid analgesic has to be added in such cases but for 2 days. Mean hospital stay ranges between 23 hrs -80hrs. All the 82 patients (93.18%) patients returned to normal activity within 4-5 days and joined their respective field of work within 7-8 days.

Conclusion: Stapler haemorroidopexy is a good alternative to the open surgery for the treatment of 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degrees haemorrhoids in terms of less pain, early return to normal activities, faster return to work, but high cost of instrument puts the procedure to back foot

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Parks AG : De Haemorroids : A study in surgical history.Guys HospResp 1995;104:135-156. [PubMed]

2. Loder PB, Kamm MA, Nicholls RJ, Philips RK. Haemorroids : Pathology, pathophysiology and etiology. Br J Surg. 1994;81: 946-954. [PubMed]

3. Lorenzo-Rivero S (August 2009). Haemorroids: diagnosis and current management. Am Surg 75 (8) : 635-42.

4. Milligan ET, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R: Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and operative treatment of haemorroids. Lancet1937;1119-1124. [PubMed]

5. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR: Closed haemorroidectomy. Dis colon rectum 1959;2:1176-79. [PubMed]

6. Thompson WHF. The nature of haemorroids. Br J Surg 1975;62:542-52. [PubMed]

7. The Standard Task Force, American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of haemorroids. Dis Colon rectum 1993;36:1118-20. [PubMed]

8. Longo A. Treatment of haemorroid disease by reduction of mucosa and haemoroid prolapsed with a circular suturing device. A new procedure. Proceedings of the sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,Rome, Italy,3-6 June1998,pp 777-784. [PubMed]

9. Shalaby R, Desoky A randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan Haemoirroidectomy. Br. J. Surg2001,88;1049-53. [PubMed]

10. Boccasanta P, CaprettiPG,Venturi M, Cioffi , Simone MD, Salamina G et al. Randomized controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular haemorroidectomy in advanced haemorroids with external mucosal prolapsed. Am J Surg 2001;182:64-68.

11. Gravie JF, LehurPA,Huten N, Papillon M, Fantoli M, Descottes B et al. Stapled haemorroidopexy versus Miligan-Morgan Haemorroidectomy; a prospective randomized, multicenter trial with 2 years prospective follow up. Ann Surg 2005; 242:29-35.

12. Pavlidis T, Papaziogas B, Souparis A,Patsas A, KOutelidakis I, Papaziogas T. Modern stapled Longo procedure vs conventional Milligan-Morgan Haemorroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Intl J Colorectal Diseases 2002;17: 50-53.

13. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential Mucosectomy (staple haemorroidectomy) vs conventional haemorroidectomy: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:779-81.

14. Racalbuto A, Aliotta I , Corsaro G, Lanteri R, Cataldo AD, Licata A. Haemorroidal stapler prolapsectomy vs Milligan-Morgan Haemorroidectomy . a long term randomized trial. Intl J Colorectal Disease 2004;19: 239-44. [PubMed]

15. Chung CC, Cheung HYS, Chan ESW, Kwok SY, Li MKW, Stapled haemorroidopexy vs Harmonic scalpel haemorroidectomy. A randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1213-1219. [PubMed]

16. Ho Yh, Cheong WK, Tsang C, Ho J, Eu KW, Tang CL et. Stapled haemorroidectomy – cost effectiveness. Randomized controlled trial including incointenence scoring, anaorectalmanometry and endoanal ultrasound assessment upto three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43: 1666-75.

17. Bikhchandani J, Agarwal PN, Hant R, Malik VK. Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and midterm results of stapled vs open haemorroidectomy . Am J urg 2005;189:56-60. [PubMed]

18. Basdanis G, Papadopoulus VN, MichaelopoulusA ,Apostolidis S, Harlaftis N. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorroidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. SurgEndosc 2005;19: 235-39.

19. Correa- Rovelo JM, Tellez O, Obregon L, Miranda Gomez A, Moran S. Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs Closed haemorroidectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2002 ;45:1367-74.

20. W. J. Shao, G.C. H. Li, Z.H. K. Zhang, B.L. Yang, G.D.Sun , Y.Q.Chen. Systematic rewiew and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorroidopexy with conventional haemorroidectomy.br J Surg 2008;95:147-60.

21. Gouda M ,Ellaben, Stapled haemorroidectomy vs Traditional haemorroidectomy for the treatment of haemorroids. World J Surg vol.2 issue 2010. [PubMed]

22. BharatiHiremath , Gupta S. Stapled haemorroidopexy for haemorroids.a review of our early experience.Ind. J. Surg 2012;74(2):163-5. [PubMed]

23. R. Gajbhiye, B.Tirupade, H. Banarkaretal.Prospective study of stapler haemorroidectomy. JEMDS2014;vol.3:issue73:p15356-363. [PubMed]

24. Ammaturo C, Tufano A. Stapled heamorroidopexy vs milliganmorganhaemorroidectomy for grade 3 haemorroids: a randomized clinical trial G Chir; 2012:33(10):346-351. [PubMed]

25. Wolthius AM, Pennincks F, Cornille JB, Fieuws S, D’ Hoore A. Recurrent symptoms after stapled haemorroidopexy and the impact on patients satisfaction after a minimal of two years follow up. ActaChir Belg;2012;112(6):419-22.

26. Dayton, Peter FLawrence,Richard Bell, Merril T. (2008). Essentials of General Surgery (4th edition. Philadelphia; Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins p-329)
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i6.123
Published: 2015-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Kumar Rakhonde A, Chanchalani R. Stapler Haemorroidopexy - our experience in a tertiary care hospital of central India. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2015Jul.31 [cited 2024Nov.22];3(6):635-40. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/294
Section
Original Article