Modified soft tissue release procedure in idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus

  • Dr. Arvind Kumar Sharma M.D. (P.M.R.), Resident, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dr Prof. Vijai Prakash Sharma M.S.(Ortho), D.N.B.(PMR), FICS, FACS, FIMSA, MAMS, PG-Spine (Aust.), Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta M.D., D.N.B.(P.M.R.), Associate Professor & Head, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Dileep Kumar M.S. (Ortho.), Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i6.108
Keywords: Talipes equinovarus, Pirani scoring, Podogrammical assessment, Foot bimalleolar angle

Abstract

Introduction: Initial treatment of clubfoot is non operative usually, but cases which prove to be resistant require surgical treatment. The most commonly used posteromedial incisions have been reported to have complications like skin sloughing, dehiscence, infection, limitation of full correction, hypertrophic scar and recurrence. Thus the treatment is shifting towards less aggressive surgeries. The aim of the study is to evaluate the result of a “modified soft tissue release procedure” through a single posterior incision for the correction of the idiopathic clubfoot.

Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective therapeutic study reviewing patients with idiopathic congenital clubfoot resistant to conservative management in our institution between August 2013 and July 2014. Surgical management was given by modified soft tissue release procedure. Pre and post treatment clinical, podogrammical, and radiological assessments were done.

Results: A total of 82 clubfeet were reviewed. Surgical correction observed in the feet was clinically significant as per Pirani scoring, foot bimalleolar angle and talocalcaneal angle lateral view and talocalcaneal index. Improvement was clinically not significant as per talocalcaneal angle in anteroposterior view. Complications included postoperative pyrexia, pain and stiffness and superficial wound infection, 1 foot of treatment failure and 2 feet of residual deformity in the follow up period. Final clinical outcome revealed excellent and good result in 85.36% cases by this technique.

Conclusion: The present study concludes that the procedure is effective in treating the deformity. The results are equivalent while complications are lesser compared to more aggressive surgeries. FBM angle is a simple method for assessment of correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ikeda K . Conservative treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992 Mar-Apr;12(2):217-23.

2. Barker S, Chesney D, Miedzybrodzka Z, Maffulli N. Genetics and epidemiology of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23(2): 265-272.

3. Kite JH. Non operative treatment of congenital clubfeet. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;84:29-38. [PubMed]

4. Ippolito E, Farsetti P, Caterini R, Tudisco C. Long term comparative results in patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different protocols. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A(7): 1286-1294. [PubMed]

5. Hutchins PM, Foster BK, Paterson DC, Cole EA. Long-term results of early surgical release in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67(5): 791-79. [PubMed]

6. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term followup of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive softtissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(5): 986-996 [PMID: 16651573 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00114]. [PubMed]

7. Carroll NC, McMurtry R, Leete SF. The pathoanatomy of congenital clubfoot. Orthop Clin North Am 1978;9(1):225-32. [PubMed]

8. Carroll NC. Congenital clubfoot: Pathanatomy and treatment. Instr Course Lect. 1988;37:93-106.11. [PubMed]

9. Crawford AH, Gupta AK. Clubfoot controversies: Complications and causes for failure. Instr Course Lect 1996;45:339-46. [PubMed]

10. Hutchins PM, Foster BK, Paterson DC, Cole EA. Long-term results of early surgical release in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985;67(5):791-9. [PubMed]

11. Laaveg SJ, Ponseti IV. Long-term results of treatment of congenital club foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62(1): 23-31. [PubMed]

12. Cooper DM, Dietz FR. Treatment of idiopathic clubfoot.A thirty-year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77(10):1477-1489. [PubMed]

13. Marios G Lykissas et al.(2013) Ponseti method compared with soft-tissue release for the management of clubfoot: A meta-analysis study.World Journal of Orthopaedics 2013 July 18;4(3):144-153. [PubMed]

14. Dyer PF, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006 ; 88-B(8);1082-1084. [PubMed]

15. Pirani S, Outerbridge HK, Sawatzky B, Stothers K. A reliable method of clinically evaluating a virgin clubfoot evaluation.21 SICOT Congress.

16. Mckay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment. Section 01; Principles and morbid anatomy.J Pediatr Ortop 1982;2:347-356

17. Mckay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment. Section 02; Principles and morbid anatomy.J Pediatr Ortop 1983;(3):10-21.

18. Kite JH. The Clubfoot. Grune & Stratton 1964. NewYork, London. [PubMed]

19. Malcom swann, Llyod Roberts, Caterall A. Anatomy of uncorrected clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg1969;51-B,263. [PubMed]

20. Coleman, S.S.: Complex Foot Deformities in Children. Philadelphia,Lea &Febiger, 1983, pp. 23-110.

21. Lovell, W.W., and Winter, R.B.: Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 2.Philadelphia,J.B. Lippincott, 1978, pp. 917-930.

22. Tachdjian, M.O.: Pediatric Orthopaedics, Vol. 1. Philadelphia,W.B. Saunders, 1972, pp. 1274-1322. [PubMed]

23. R. Jay Cummings, Richard S. Davidson, Peter F. Armstrong, Wallace B. Lehman, Congenital Clubfoot J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002 Feb;84-A(2):290-308. [PubMed]

24. Singh BI, Vaishnavi AJ. Modified Turco procedure for treatment of idiopathic clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005;438:209-14. [PubMed]

25. Turco VJ. Surgical correction of the resistant club foot. One-stage posteromedial release with internal fixation: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1971;53(3): 477-97. [PubMed]

26. Aggarwal ND, Singh HS, Mittal RL. Evaluation of tibialis posterior transfer on surgical treatment of congenital clubfoot. IJS1967;29:4-105. [PubMed]

27. Main J B.,Crider R.J.,Polk M.,Lloyg-Roberts, et al :The resuts of early operation in TEV,Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.1977; 59-B, 337-341. [PubMed]

28. Varma H S , Agarwal AC et al. Surgical management of congenital idiopathic club foot by twin incisions.J Orthop Allied Sci 2013;1:18-21.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i6.108
Published: 2015-07-31
How to Cite
1.
Kumar Sharma A, Sharma VP, Kumar Gupta A, Kumar D. Modified soft tissue release procedure in idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2015Jul.31 [cited 2024Nov.22];3(6):572-8. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/282
Issue
Vol 3 No 6 (2015): JULY
Section
Original Article