Institutionalizing early vaccination of newborns delivered at government health facilities: Experiences from India

  • Dr. Gunjan Taneja Maternal and Child Integrated Program (MCHIP)/India, now with IPE Global / State RMNCH+A Unit, Jharkhand, India
  • Dr.Vijaya Kiran Mentey MCHIP/India, now with MR Medical College for Women, Hyderabad, India
  • Dr. Manish Jain MCHIP/India, now with India, Health Action Trust/Technical Support Unit, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dr. Karan Singh Sagar MCHIP/India. now with GAVI, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Dr. Bhupendra Tripathi MCHIP / India, now with Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Delhi, India
  • Dr Mr. Micheal Favin MCHIP, now with the Maternal and Child Survival (MCSP) Project and The Manoff Group, Washington DC, USA
  • Dr Mr. Robert Steinglass MCHIP, now with MCSP and John Snow,Inc, Washington DC, USA
Keywords: Immunization, newborn vaccination

Abstract

Newborn Vaccination is identified as a critical parameter for evaluating the overall performance of immunization programs with guidelines clearly advocating for administration of BCG, OPV zero dose and Hepatitis B birth dose to newborns. However in spite of sustained improvement in full immunization coverage in India, coverage of newborn vaccines has remained traditionally low. The USAID supported Maternal and Child Health Integrated Program (MCHIP), operational in India from 2009 – 2014 provided technical support to the Universal Immunization Program (UIP) at the National level and in the states of Jharkhand and Uttar Pradesh. During the project period, MCHIP undertook an assessment in 46 selected health facilities across 5 districts of the two states to study the implementation of the newborn vaccination program. Key findings from the assessment included a lack of knowledge among staff about the benefits of newborn vaccination, absence of written guidelines, unavailability of one vaccine compromising the administration of the remaining two and poor documentation practices. Following the assessment technical support was provided to strengthen implementation at these selected facilities which included providing on-the-job orientations to staff members posted in delivery rooms, establishing a sound supply chain mechanism to ensure round the clock availability of vaccines in labour rooms, strengthening documentation by incorporating separate columns in the delivery registers for recording vaccine administration and improved Supportive Supervision mechanisms. The intervention produced favorable results with a progressive increase in coverage of not only BCG and OPV zero dose but also Hepatitis B birth dose which was introduced in the UIP during the course of the intervention. Overall this intervention, which focused on operationalizing an already existing strategy, clearly indicated that the practice of vaccinating newborns delivered at health facilities is easily implementable and replicable, and that its sustainability should ensure improved coverage and protection against targeted vaccine-preventable diseases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Weekly Epidemiological Record. WHO position paper on polio vaccines and polio immunization in the pre-eradication era; 2010; 85 (23): 213-228. Available from: http://www.who.int/wer/ 2010/wer8523.pdf; accessed on 11-09-2014

2. Bhaskaram P et al. Systemic and mucosal immune response to polio vaccination with additional dose in newborn period. J Trop Pediatr. 1997 Aug;43(4):232-4. [PubMed]

3. Weekly Epidemiological Record. WHO position paper on BCG vaccine; 2004; 79 (4): 27-38.Available from: http://www.who.int/wer/2004/en/wer7904.pdf; accessed on 11-09-2014.

4. Weekly Epidemiological Record. WHO position paper on Hepatitis B vaccine; 2009; 84 (40): 405-419.Available from: http://www.who.int/wer/2009/wer8440.pdf; accessed on 11-09-2013.

5. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India. Immunization Handbook for Medical Officers; 2009.

6. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2000. National FamilyHealth Survey (NFHS-2), 1998–99: India: Volume I.Mumbai: IIPS.

7. International Institute for PopulationSciences (IIPS) and Macro International. 2007. National FamilyHealth Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Mumbai: IIPS.

8. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), 2010. District Level Household and Facility Survey (DLHS-3), 2007-08: India: Key Indicators: States and Districts, Mumbai: IIPS.

9. UNICEF Coverage Evaluation Survey, 2009: National Fact Sheet.

10. The State of World’s Children: UNICEF, 2013.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i5.089
Published: 2015-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Taneja G, Kiran Mentey V, Jain M, Singh Sagar K, Tripathi B, Favin M, Steinglass R. Institutionalizing early vaccination of newborns delivered at government health facilities: Experiences from India. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2015Jun.30 [cited 2024Nov.8];3(5):521-7. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/275
Section
Perspective