Sonological Evaluation of Scrotal Pathology by High Resolution Ultrasound and Color Doppler
Abstract
Introduction: The development of sonogram with high frequency linear transducer and color doppler is an important mile stone in evaluating scrotal pathologies. Computed tomography exposes testicles to the radiation and MRI is not so easily available. Therefore ultrasound with color Doppler is the best suited modality for the evaluation of scrotal pathologies as it is simple, noninvasive, reproducible, relatively inexpensive and widely available investigation that will not expose the testis to radiation.
Aims and Objectives: To classify (etiologically) and to evaluate various scrotal pathologies using ultrasonography and describe the role of High resolution ultrasound and colour doppler in their diagnosis and differentiation.
Materials and Methods: The study was done on 60 patients who were referred to the radiology department by the General Surgery and Urology departments for scrotal ultrasound and Doppler study. This study was conducted between May 2012 to September 2014 at Katuri Medical College and Hospital, Chinnakondrupadu, Guntur.
Results : Of the 60 patients studied, incidence of various pathologies were as follows -inflammatory pathology in 26%, congenital in 12%, scrotal hernia in 16%, infertility in 8%, torsion in 7%, tumors in 3.3%, trauma in 3%, and others in 26.7%. The imaging features of these conditions with differentiating hallmarks are described.
Conclusion: High frequency ultrasonography is invaluable in demonstrating normalcy of testes and epididymis in the presence of large hydroceles. High-frequency ultrasonography enables clear demonstration of the morphological alterations associated with acute scrotal inflammatory diseases. Color doppler sonography is highly sensitive in diagnosing acute scrotal pathology and accurately differentiates testicular ischemia /torsion from acute inflammatory conditions.
Downloads
References
2. Wright S, Hoffmann B. Emergency ultrasound of acute scrotal pain. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;22(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000123. [PubMed]
3. Sommers D, Winter T .Ultrasonography evaluation of scrotal masses. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;52(6):1265-81. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2014.07.014. [PubMed]
4. Dogra VS, Gottlieb RH, Oka M, Rubens DJ. Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):18-36. Epub 2003 Feb 28. [PubMed]
5. Brown JM, Hammers LW, Barton JW, et al. Quantitative Doppler assessment of acute scrotal inflammation. Radiology. 1995 Nov;197(2):427-31. [PubMed]
6. Farriol VG, Comella XP, Agromayor EG, Creixams XS, Martinez De La Torre IB. Gray-scale and power Doppler sonographic appearances of acute inflammatory diseases of the scrotum. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000 Feb;28(2):67-72.
7. D'Andrea A, Coppolino F, Cesarano E, et al. US in the assessment of acute scrotum. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013 Jul 15;5 Suppl 1:S8. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-S1-S8. Epub 2013 Jul 15. [PubMed]
8. Thinyu S, Muttarak M. Role of ultrasonography in diagnosis of scrotal disorders: a review of 110 cases. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2009 Jan;5(1):e2. doi: 10.2349/biij.5.1.e2. Epub 2009 Jan 1. [PubMed]
9. Frush DP, Sheldon CA. Diagnostic imaging for pediatric scrotal disorders. Radiographics. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4):969-85. [PubMed]
10. Arjhansiri K, Vises N, Kitsukjit W. Sonographic evaluation of the intrascrotal disease. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004 Sep;87 Suppl 2:S161-7. [PubMed]
11. Ismail Mihmanli , FatihKantarc. Sonography of scrotal abnormalities in adults- an update. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009 Mar;15(1):64-73. [PubMed]
12. Sung EK, Setty BN, Castro-Aragon I. Sonography of the pediatric scrotum: emphasis on the Ts--torsion, trauma, and tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 May;198(5):996-1003. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8034. [PubMed]
13. Bhatt S, Jafri SZ, Wasserman N, Dogra VS. Imaging of non-neoplastic intratesticular masses. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011 Mar;17(1):52-63. doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3116-09.0. Epub 2010 Jun 30. [PubMed]
14. Blair RJ. Testicular and scrotal masses. Pediatr Rev. 2014 Oct;35(10):450-1; discussion 451. doi: 10.1542/pir.35-10-450.
15. Wolverson MK, Houttuin E, Heiberg E, Sundaram M, Gregory J. High Resolution Real Time Sonography Of Scrotal Varicocele. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Oct;141(4):775-9. [PubMed]
16. Carkaci S, Ozkan E, Lane D, Yang WT. Scrotal sonography revisited. J Clin Ultrasound. 2010 Jan;38(1):21-37. doi: 10.1002/jcu.20642. [PubMed]
17. Meacham RB, Townsend RR, Rademacher D, Drose JA. The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, gray scale sonography and color Doppler sonography. J Urol. 1994 Jun;151(6):1535-8.
18. Petros JA, Andriole GL, Middleton WD, Picus DA. Correlation of testicular color Doppler ultrasonography, physical examination and venography in the detection of left varicoceles in men with infertility. J Urol 1991 Apr;145(4):785–788.
19. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, O'Donoghue MJ, Green DE. From the archives of the AFIP: tumors and tumorlike lesions of the testis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):189-216.