Comparison of Retroperitoneal & Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Management of Pyonephrosis in Terms of Conversion to Open Surgery

  • Dr Osman B. Belim M.S (Gen .Surgery) Senior Resident Department of Surgery, Medical College Baroda, India
  • Dr N J Shah M.S (Gen .Surgery) Senior Resident Department of Surgery, Medical College Baroda, India
  • Dr Milind V Patil M.S (Gen .Surgery) Senior Resident Department of Surgery, Medical College Baroda, India
  • Dr Bodhraj Pasi M.S (Gen .Surgery) Senior Resident Department of Surgery, Medical College Baroda, India
Keywords: Laproscopy, Nephrectomy, Pyonephrosis

Abstract

Introduction: Since the mid-1990s, there has been an evolution in surgical practice from traditional open approaches to minimally invasive means of treating operative lesions. This study is carried out to study rate & indication of conversion to open surgery in pyonephrosis using retroperitonel and trans peritoneal laproscopic nephrectomy.

Materials And Methods: This study was retrospective study done in Department of Urology Civil hospital & B J Medical College Ahmadabad .We performed a retrospective review of a maintained database of 219 consecutive laparoscopic simple nephrectomies done for pyonephrosis between July 2001 to February. 2013.

Results: In study transperitoneal route using four ports was used in 165 (75.3%) while retroperitoneal access using three was used in 54(24.6%) patients. In our study total 163 (74.4%) had PCN (percutaneous nephrostomy) in situ, 79.3% in lap transperitoneal group and 59.2% in lap retro peritoneal group. 27(12.3%) patients required conversion to open surgery. Adhesion 13(5.9%) and bleeding 9(4.1%) were the main factors for conversion, while 2 (0.9%) patients required conversion due to bowel injury and limited space in 3(1.3%) patients. Conversion rate was 12.1 % (20/165) for transperitoneal procedures while 12.9 % (7/54) for retroperitoneal approach. Laparoscopic approach requires proper placement of ports for meticulous surgical dissection. Preoperative plain and CECT help in identifying renal hilar anatomy as well as the relationship with the surrounding structures.

Conclusion: In our study, retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy has to be considered equal to transperitoneal laproscopic nephrectomy in terms of conversion to open surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper Nj, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):278-82. [PubMed]

2. Gaur D D, Agrawal D K, Purohit K C. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1993 Jan;149(1):103-5. [PubMed]

3. Rozenberg H, Bruyere F, Abdelkader T, Husset A, Hamoura H. Transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Prog Urol. 1999 Dec;9(6):1034-8.

4. Eraky I, el-Kappany HA, Ghoneim MA. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Mansoura experience with 106 cases. Br J Urol. 1995 Mar;75(3):271-5. [PubMed]

5. Keeley FX, Tolley DA. A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol. 1998 Nov;82(5):615-8. [PubMed]

6. Ono Y, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy and adrenalectomy: Nagoya experience. J Urol 1994;152(6 Pt 1):1962–6. [PubMed]

7. Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, et al. Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney: a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology. 1994 May;43(5):607-13. [PubMed]

8. Rassweiler J1, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P. Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol. 1998;33(5):489-96. [PubMed]

9. Parra RO, Perez MG, Boullier JA, Cummings JM. Comparison between standard flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol. 1995 Apr;153(4):1171-3; discussion 1173-4.

10. Hemal AK1, Gupta NP, Wadhwa SN, Goel A, Kumar R.. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: a single-center experience. Urology. 2001 Apr;57(4):644-9. [PubMed]

11. Gaur DD. Simple nephrectomy: retroperitoneal approach. J Endourol. 2000 Dec;14(10):787-90; discussion 791.[PubMed]

12. Doublet JD, Peraldi MN, Monsaint H, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy of native kidneys in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1997 Jul 15;64(1):89-91.

13. Ono Y1, Katoh N, Kinukawa T, Matsuura O, Ohshima S. Laparoscopic nephrectomy via the retroperitoneal approach. J Urol. 1996 Sep;156(3):1101-4. [PubMed]

14. Rassweiler J1, Frede T, Henkel TO, Stock C, Alken P. Nephrectomy: a comparative study between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus the open approach. Eur Urol. 1998;33(5):489-96.

15. McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Fadden PT. Retroperitoneoscopy the Washington University Medical School experience. Urology. 1994 Apr;43(4):446-52. [PubMed]

16. Keeley FX, Tolley DA. A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol.1998;82(5):615–8.

17. Rassweiler J, Fornara P, Weber M, Janetschek G, Fahlenkamp D, Henkel T, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy the experience of the laparoscopy working group of the German Urologic Association. J Urol. 1998;160(1):18–21.

18. Bercowsky E, Shalhav AL, Portis A, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Clayman RV, et al. Is the laparoscopic approach justified in patients with Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis? Urology. 1999;54(3):437–42.

19. Kapoor R, Vijjan V, Singh K, Goyal R, Mandhani A, Dubey D, et al. Is laparoscopic nephrectomy the preferred approach in Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis? Urology. 2006;68(5):952–5. [PubMed]

20. Vanderbrink BA, Ost MC, Rastinehad A, Anderson A, Badlani G, Smith A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: Contemporary outcomes analysis. J Endourol. 2007;21:65–70.

21. Rosoff J, Raman JD, Del Pizzo JJ. Feasibility of laparoscopic approach in management of Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis.Urology. 2006;68(4):711–4.

22. Manohar T, Desai M, Desai M. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory condition. J Endourol. 2007;21(11):1323–8. [PubMed]

23. Khaira HS, Shah RB, Wolf JS. Laparoscopic and open surgical nephrectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis. J Endourol.2005;19(7):813–7. [PubMed]

24. Guzzo TJ, Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM, Varkarakis J, Schaeffer EM, Allaf ME. Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis: Presentation and management in the era of laparoscopy. BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9):1265-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08547.x. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

25. Katz R, Pode D, Golijanin D, Gofrit ON, Shenfeld OZ, Shapiro A, Reissman P. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for infected, obstructed and non-functioning kidneys. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004 Dec;14(6):340-3. [PubMed]

26. Ricardo J. Duarte, Anuar I. Mitre, José L. Chambô, Marco A. Arap, and Miguel Srougi. Journal of Endourology. April 2008, 22(4): 681-686. doi:10.1089/end.2007.0291.Volume: 22 Issue 4: April 17, 2008. [PubMed]

27. Zaidi Z, Samad L, Aquil S.The Indus Hospital, C-76, Sector 31/5, Korangi Crossing, Korangi, Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2007 Jul;57(7):355-9.

28.Wayland Hsiao and John G. Pattaras. Journal of Endourology. October 2008;22(10):2285-2290. doi:10.1089/end.2008.9718.Volume: 22 Issue 10: October 20, 2008. [PubMed]

29. M. Tobias-Machado; Marco T. Lasmar; Lucas T. Batista; Pedro H. Forseto Jr; Roberto V. Juliano; Eric R. Wroclawski Division of Urology, ABC Medical School, Santo André, Sao Paulo, Brazil Int. braz j urol. 2005;31(1) Rio de Janeiro Jan./Feb. 2005.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2014.i06.12
Published: 2014-12-31
How to Cite
1.
B. Belim O, Shah NJ, V Patil M, Pasi B. Comparison of Retroperitoneal & Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in Management of Pyonephrosis in Terms of Conversion to Open Surgery. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2014Dec.31 [cited 2024Dec.23];2(6):578-84. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/161
Section
Original Article