Dosimetric comparison of radiotherapy treatment plans done by IMRT and VMAT technique in head and neck cancer patients
Abstract
Background: The increasing patient load in radiotherapy centres demands selection of the technique that provides plans with optimal dosimetry in terms of target volume coverage, organs at risk (OAR) sparing and a lesser treatment time. This study was designed to compare the two widely practised conformal techniques, IMRT and VMAT in head and neck cancer patients in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage, OAR sparing and treatment delivery parameters.
Materials and methods: For ten postoperative head and neck cancer patients who had been treated by IMRT technique virtual VMAT plans were generated for study purposes. The dose prescribed to PTV was 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The dose-volume parameters of PTV and OARs and the treatment delivery parameters were compared amongst both the techniques. Statistical significance was calculated using paired ‘t’ test.
Results: Both the plans were comparable in terms of dosimetry. The only significant difference being better conformity in the IMRT plans. The dose to OARs was also comparable in both the techniques except for a significant reduction in the point dose to brainstem with the IMRT technique. Given the treatment delivery parameters, there was a significant reduction in the treatment delivery time and monitor units with the VMAT technique compared to the IMRT technique.
Conclusion: VMAT technique gave comparable plans to that of the IMRT technique in terms of dosimetry but reduced the treatment time. It seems feasible in radiotherapy centres with increased patient load.
Downloads
References
Taylor A, Powell ME. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy--what is it? Cancer Imaging. 2004 Mar 26;4(2):68-73. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2004.0003.
Vanetti E, Clivio A, Nicolini G, Fogliata A, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP, et al. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx and larynx: a treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008.
Teoh M, Clark CH, Wood K, Whitaker S, Nisbet A. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: a review of current literature and clinical use in practice. Br J Radiol. 2011 Nov;84(1007):967-96. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22373346.
Biau J, Lapeyre M, Troussier I, Budach W, Giralt J, Grau C, et al. Selection of lymph node target volumes for definitive head and neck radiation therapy: a 2019 Update. Radiother Oncol. 2019 May;134:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.018.
Stroom JC, Heijmen BJ. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report. Radiother Oncol. 2002 Jul;64(1):75-83. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(02)00140-8.
Hodapp N. Der ICRU-Report 83: Verordnung, Dokumentation und Kommunikation der fluenzmodulierten Photonenstrahlentherapie (IMRT) [The ICRU Report 83: prescribing, recording and reporting photon-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)]. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012 Jan;188(1):97-9. German. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-0015-x.
Studenski MT, Bar-Ad V, Siglin J, Cognetti D, Curry J, Tuluc M, et al. Clinical experience transitioning from IMRT to VMAT for head and neck cancer. Med Dosim. 2013 Summer;38(2):171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2012.10.009.
Holt A, Van Gestel D, Arends MP, Korevaar EW, Schuring D, Kunze-Busch MC, et al. Multi-institutional comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck cancer: a planning study. Radiat Oncol. 2013 Jan 31;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-26.
Kryger, M., Wang, W., Wu, S. P. P., Xue, J., et al. A Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Treatment Planning for Head and Neck Cancer With NTCP/TCP Analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 99 (2), 2017. E680.
Johnston M, Clifford S, Bromley R, Back M, Oliver L, Eade T. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck radiotherapy: a planning comparison using simultaneous integrated boost for nasopharynx and oropharynx carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Oct;23(8):503-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.02.002.
Wiezorek T, Brachwitz T, Georg D, Blank E, Fotina I, Habl G, et al. Rotational IMRT techniques compared to fixed gantry IMRT and tomotherapy: multi-institutional planning study for head-and-neck cases. Radiat Oncol. 2011 Feb 21;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-20.
Rao M, Yang W, Chen F, Sheng K, Ye J, Mehta V, et al. Comparison of Elekta VMAT with helical tomotherapy and fixed field IMRT: plan quality, delivery efficiency and accuracy. Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1350-9. doi: 10.1118/1.3326965.
Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, Bieker M, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 May 1;74(1):252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.033.
Cozzi L, Fogliata A, Bolsi A, Nicolini G, Bernier J. Three-dimensional conformal vs. intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer patients: comparative analysis of dosimetric and technical parameters. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Feb 1;58(2):617-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.09.059.
Copyright (c) 2021 Author (s). Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
OAI - Open Archives Initiative
