Role of pleural biopsy in patients of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion

  • Dr. Nidhi Sanwalka Post graduate resident, Rukmani Devi Beni Prasad Jaipuria Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Dr. Ramesh Kumar Post Graduate Resident, Rukmani Devi Beni Prasad Jaipuria Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
  • Dr. Madhvi Sanwalka Post Graduate Resident, National Institute of Medical Sciences And Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/ijmrr.2020.i03.08
Keywords: Etiology, Exudative, Undiagnosed, Pleural effusion, Pleural biopsy, Tuberculosis, Malignancy

Abstract

Introduction: Sometimes etiological diagnosis of pleural fluid is not possible by cytology, biochemical and microbiological examinations and labeled as undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. Our aim of this study to make an etiological diagnosis in such undiagnosed exudative cases with pleural biopsy.

Material and method: In this study patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion, where the diagnosis was not made by laboratory investigations were included. Pleural tissue was obtained by Abram’s Needle and sent for histopathology and culture to find mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Result: Out of 45 patients 34 (75.5%) were males and 11 (24.5%) were females. The side of pleural effusion was right-sided in 30 (66.6%) and left-sided in 15 (33.4%). The mean value of polymorphs and lymphocytes count was 7.24% and 92.76% respectively. Pleural fluid was hemorrhagic in 10 (22.22%) patients, straw-colored in 30 (71.11%) patients, and clear in 5 (11.11%) patients. The mean level of glucose was 65.66 mg/dl, the lowest being nil and highest being 110 mg/dl. The mean level of protein was 5.54 gm/dl (range 3.7-7.21 gm/dl). The mean value of the pH of pleural fluid was 65.44. Histopathology showed granulomatous inflammation compatible with tuberculosis in 24 (53.3%) cases, metastatic malignancy in 7 (15.5%) cases, chronic inflammation in 10 (22.3%) cases. In 4 (8.9%) cases pleural tissue was inadequate to give any opinion. Among 7 cases of malignancy, 5 (71.42%) cases showed adenocarcinomas and 2 (28.58%) cases showed squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion: This study suggests that tuberculosis and malignancy are the two common etiologies for exudative pleural effusion. The role of pleural biopsy is pivotal as it helps in making the diagnosis in the majority of cases where other laboratory investigations fail to provide a diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Light RW. Diagnostic principles in pleural disease. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(2):476-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10020476.

Saguil A, Wyrick K, Hallgren J. Diagnostic Approach to Pleural Effusion. Am Fam Physician 2014;90(2):99-104.

Hirsh A,Ruffle P, Nebut M, Bignon J, Chretien J. Pleural effusion: Laboratory tests in 300 cases. Thorax 1979;34(1):106-112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.34.1.106.

Al-Shimemeri AA, Al-Ghadeer HM, Girdhar HR. Diagnostic yield of closed pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusion. Saudi Ned J. 2003;24(3):282-286.

DeFrancis N, Kloske E, Albano E. Needle biopsy of the parietal pleura-preliminary report. N Eng J Med. 1955;252:948-999. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195506022522206.

Abram’s LD. A pleural biopsy punch. Lancet. 1958;271(7010):30-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(58)92521-2.

Cope C. New pleural biopsy needle. JAMA. 1958;167(9):1107-1108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1958.72990260005011a.

Ogirala RG, Agarwal V, Aldrich TK. Radja pleural biopsy needle. A comparison with the Abrams needle in experimental pleural effusion. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989,139(4);984-987. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/139.4.984.

Pandit S, Chaudhuri AD, Datta SBS, Dey A, Bhanja P. Role of pleural biopsy in etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion. Lung India. 2010;27(4):202-204. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-2113.71941.

Biswas A, Bhatracharya S. Diagnostic role of closed pleural biopsy in the investigation of exudative pleural effusion. J Indian Med Assoc. 2008;106(8);525-526.

Menzies R, Charbonneau M. Thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of pleural diseases. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114(4):271-276. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-4-271.

Bhattacharya S, Bairagya TD, Das a, Mandal A and Das SK. Closed pleural Biopsy is Still Useful in the Evaluation of Malignant Pleural effusion. J Lab Physician. 2012;4(1):35-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2727.98669.

James P, Gupta R, Christopher DJ, Balamugesh T. Evaluation of the diagnostic yield and safety of closed pleural biopsy in the diagnosi of pleural effusion. Indian J Tuberc. 2010;57(1):19-24.

Devkota KC, Chokhani R, Gautam S. Diagnostic yield of pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusion. Nepal Med Coll J. 2014;16(1):13-16.

Ahmed J, Hossain M, Rahim M, Musa AKM. Role of Pleural Biopsy in the Etiologial Diagnosis of Exudative Pleural Effusion. Chest J. 2016;149(4):A440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.458.

Rajawat GS, Batra S, Takhar RP, Rathi L, Bhandari C, Gupta ML. Diagnostic yield and safety of closed needle pleural biopsy in exudative pleural effusion. Avicenna J Med 2017;7(3):121-124. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_112_16.

CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/ijmrr.2020.i03.08
Published: 2020-06-30
How to Cite
1.
Sanwalka N, Kumar R, Sanwalka M. Role of pleural biopsy in patients of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. Int J Med Res Rev [Internet]. 2020Jun.30 [cited 2024Apr.24];8(3):265-8. Available from: https://ijmrr.medresearch.in/index.php/ijmrr/article/view/1194
Issue
Vol 8 No 3 (2020): May-Jun
Section
Original Article

Copyright (c) 2020 Author (s). Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.