Clinical profile of mortality
predictors in Leptospirosis:a prospective study in a tertiary care
center
Arun Divakar 1,
M. G. K. Pillai 2, Elizbeth Thomas3
1Dr. Arun Divakar, Assistant Professor, 2Dr. M. Gopala Krishna Pillai,
HOD Professor, 3Dr. Elizabeth Thomas, Post Graduate Student;
all authors are affiliated with department of General Medicine, Amrita
Institute of Medical Sciences, Ponekkara Kochi, Kerala, India.
Address for
Correspondence: Dr. M. Gopala Krishna Pillai, HOD
& Professor, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Ponekkara,
Kochi, Kerala, India. Email: mgkpillai@aims.amrita.edu
Abstract
Aims and Objectives:
To look for mortality predictors of Leptospirosis, with specific
importance given to oli-guric renal failure and hypotension as possible
predictors. Materials
and Methods: A Prospective Cohort study conducted over two
years which enrolled patients with clinically and serologically
confirmed Leptospirosis. Of these, 30 patients were included who had
hypotension and 30 patients who had oliguric renal failure, as per
statistical requirements. Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory
data was collected at admission and the patients were followed up to
look for outcome (discharge/death). Results:
A total of 83 patients were included in this study. Of these 8 patients
died (Mortality of 9.6%). Data analysis with Chi Square Test showed
that oliguric renal failure was significantly associated with mortality
in Leptospirosis (p<0.05). Other factors were also found which
were associated with mortality including elevated bilirubin and AST
levels, anemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Alcohol Dependence Syndrome,
and Chronic Liver Disease. However, hypotension was found to not be
significantly associated with mortality. Conclusion: In
patients with Leptospirosis, significant mortality pre-dictors included
oliguric renal failure, elevated bilirubin and AST levels, anemia, Type
2 Diabetes Mellitus, Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and Chronic Liver
Disease.
Key words:
Leptospirosis, Mortality Indicator, mortality predictors
Manuscript received: 4th
September 2017, Reviewed:
14th September 2017
Author Corrected:
20th September 2017,
Accepted for Publication: 26th September 2017
Introduction
Leptospirosis is a zoonotic disease with global distribution which is
responsible for significant mortality espe-cially in the tropical
regions. Recent data through developing surveillance programs now
indicate it is possibly the most common zoonosis [1]. Geographic
distribution shows predominance in south Asia, the Amazon Delta regions
of South America and many island nations of the Indian and Pacific
oceans [2]. Its manifestations range from asymptomatic to a severe form
of Leptospirosis called Weil’s disease, which usually
accounts for 1-10% of leptospirosis cases of which there may be around
50,000 deaths[3, 4]. This leads to an overall mortality rate of 10% for
Leptospirosis [2, 5].The objective of this study is to assess the
mortality predictors of Leptospirosis, with the primary objective being
to look for association between mortality in Leptospirosis and oliguric
renal failure or hypotension at admission. Secondary objective was to
assess if there is an association between any other epidemiological,
clinical and biochemical factors at admission (e.g. Age, presenting
complaint, potassium, etc.) and mortality in Leptospirosis. Once they
have been confirmed, the data would be used to help plan treatment. The
likelihood of needing ICU care or invasive measures such as dialysis
and ventilation can be suggested from the same. For example, current
data is already pointing towards the need for aggressive treatment of
patients with oliguric renal failure, as multiple studies have shown a
correlation between that factor and mortality. Multiple literature
reviews and studies have been done to find concrete mortality
predictors of Leptospirosis. However, different factors were found to
be significant in different studies despite the fact that similar
parame-ters were assessed. Also there is a limitation in the amount of
data available with the disease being prominent in countries where
notification systems are still being developed and majority of the data
available is retrospective. One literature review by Rajapakse S, et
al. evaluated 45 papers on Leptospirosis from the last twenty years to
look for factors to predict mortality in the severe form of the
disease. However their findings were highly varia-ble, with mortality
predictors ranging from patient characteristics including age and
alcoholism, to clinical fea-tures including hemodynamic disturbances,
laboratory results including leukocytosis, and complications includ-ing
pulmonary involvement and renal failure [6]. Goswami RP., et al.
carried out a retrospective study on 101 diagnosed Leptospirosis
patients in two hospitals in Kolkata in which clinical, biochemical,
demographic, and treatment related characteristics were collected. Even
though initial univariate analysis suggested multiple mor-tality
predictors such as older age, delayed antibiotic therapy, higher
bilirubin, APT, ALP, WBC, and APT/ALT ratio, on using multivariate Cox
regression analysis only APT/ALT ratio (HR 1.208, 95% CI 1.051-1.388)
and delay in initiation of antibiotic therapy (HR 1.208, 95% CI
1.051-1.388) remained as significant factors [7].
Similarly, studies were undertaken in Kerala to study possible
mortality predictors in Leptospirosis cases. One study was conducted in
northern Kerala during a Leptospirosis epidemic by Pappachan MJ, et al.
which as-sessed 282 laboratory confirmed cases of Leptospirosis.
Mortality during this epidemic was 6.03%. Even though initially on
univariate analysis multiple factors were thought to be predictive of
mortality, after logistic regression analysis, only presence of lung or
nervous system manifestations were found to be significantly associated
[8].
One of the few prospective cohort studies done was carried out by
Thanachai P. et al. in KhonKaen Thailand. One hundred and twenty-one
patients with confirmed Leptospirosis were identified over a period of
6 months. Exclusion factors included patients who had other concurrent
infections and children. They were followed till death or till survival
two weeks post discharge. There were seventeen mortalities. After
analysis using multiva- riate Cox regression analysis, four independent
risk factors for mortality were found. They were hypotension relative
risk (RR, 10.3); oliguria (RR, 8.8); hyperkalemia (RR, 5.9), and
presence of pulmonary rales (RR, 5.2) [9].
As the current findings regarding mortality predictors are so varying
and the majority of data is based on retros-pective data, our study
aims to help confirm which factors can actually be used to predict
mortality through prospective data.
Methods
Study setting and patient
selection- This was a prospective observational cohort
study carried out over a two year period from 2014-2016 at Amrita
Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, Kerala,
India.
Patients were identified as a clinically and serologically confirmed
case of Leptospirosis. Then patient history and admission
characteristics were entered as per the proforma with special attention
to blood pressure levels and markers of renal failure.Patients who died
after admission with diagnosis of Leptospirosis were noted. Comparison
of data of those who survived and those who succumbed to the illness
were compared with special respect to hypotension and oliguric renal
failure. Minimal data needed included blood pressure at admission or
documentation of the need for inotropic supports at admission. Also
required was renal function at time of ad-mission including urea and
creatinine along with documentation of decreased urine output fitting
criteria for oliguria.
Inclusion Criteria: Minimum
age requirement was 18 years. There was no maximum age limit set. All
patients had clinical features suggestive of Leptospirosis which was
confirmed on serologically testing with IgM ELISA.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who on initial presentation had a co-infection (eg: LRTI, UTI)
as proven by blood cultures or other serological tests were excluded
from this study.
Statistical methods- Based
on the results on the mortality rate among Leptospirosis with respect
to two impor-tant factors namely oliguria and hypotension observed in
an earlier article (Prognostic factors of death in leptospirosis: a
prospective cohort study in Khon Kaen, Thailand, Thanachai Panaphut,
Somnuek Domrongkitchaipor and Bandit Thinkamrop) [9] and with 95%
confidence and 80% power, minimum sample size came to 30 for oliguria
and 30 for hypotension. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were
taken of which 30 had oliguria and 30 had hypotension.
Statistical analysis-
Statistical analysis was done using IBM SPSS statistics, 20 windows
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). For all the continuous variables the results
are given in means ± standard deviation and for categorical
variables as percentage. To compare the mean difference of numerical
variable between groups Mann Whitney U test was applied. For analysis
of categorical variables, Chi Square Test was used.
Results
This study on Mortality Predictors in Leptospirosis spanned from 2014
– 2016 at Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi and
included 83 patients with clinical and serological evidence of
Leptospirosis. Of these, as per earlier described statistical
requirements, 30 patients with hypotension were included and 30
patients with oliguric renal failure were included. Patients were
divided according to their outcomes. Outcomes taken were survivor and
non-survivors. There were 75 survivors and 8 non-survivors. Of these 8
non-survivors, 6 were as-sociated with oliguric renal failure and 5
were associated with hypotension, while one was associated only with
pulmonary hemorrhage.
Demographic data- On
analyzing the 83 patients who were included in the study, 57 (68.7%)
were male and 26 (31.3%) females.In this group of people, the average
age was 48.5 ± 15 years.
Main study data-
Baseline data collected on each case of Leptospirosis included
epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data. Clinical data showed
that fever was the most common complaint of patients with 92.8% of
patients presenting with this symptom. The next most common was myalgia
(44.6%), headache (26.5%), and cough (20.5%). The time it took to
initiate antibiotics was also analysed and it was found that on average
anti-biotics were started 5.1 ± 2.47 days after developing
symptoms. As far as clinical features went, the most fre-quent was
renal failure. Oliguric renal failure and hypotension were present at a
fixed frequency as per sample size. Icterus, crepitations and
hepatomegaly were found in 31.3%, 28.9%, and 12% respectively. Other
clinical features (conjunctival suffusion, rash, rhonchi, splenomegaly,
meningismus, hypo/areflexia, haemorrhage, aseptic meningitis) were
present at less than 10%.
Table-1: Association
between different clinical features and mortality
Factors
|
Category
|
Mortality
|
p Value
|
n (%)
|
|
Oliguric renal failure
|
Yes (30)
|
6 (20)
|
0.016
|
No (53)
|
2 (3.8)
|
Hypotension
|
Yes (30)
|
5 (16.7)
|
0.103
|
No (53)
|
3
(5.7)
|
Fever
|
Yes (77)
|
7 (9.1)
|
0.545
|
No (6)
|
1 (16.7)
|
Headache
|
Yes (22)
|
1 (4.5)
|
0.345
|
No (61)
|
7 (11.5)
|
Jaundice
|
Yes (9)
|
2 (22.2)
|
0.176
|
No (74)
|
6 (8.1)
|
Cough
|
Yes (17)
|
2 (11.8)
|
0.739
|
No (66)
|
6 (9.1)
|
Icterus
|
Yes (26)
|
2 (7.7)
|
0.685
|
No (57)
|
6 (10.5)
|
Hyporeflexia
|
Yes (3)
|
1 (33.3)
|
0.157
|
No (80)
|
7 (8.8)
|
Acute renal failure
|
Yes (51)
|
6 ( 11.8)
|
0.407
|
No (32)
|
2 (6.3)
|
Table-2: Association
between laboratory abnormalities and mortality
Factors
|
Category
|
Mortality
|
p Value
|
n (%)
|
Elevated bilirubin
|
Yes (53)
|
8 (15.1)
|
0.025
|
No (30)
|
0 (0)
|
Transaminitis
|
Yes (48)
|
7 (14.6)
|
0.074
|
No (35)
|
1 (2.9)
|
Hypokalemia
|
Yes (25)
|
1 (4)
|
0.253
|
No (58)
|
7 (12.1)
|
Leukocytosis
|
Yes (43)
|
5 (11.6)
|
0.524
|
No (40)
|
3 (7.5)
|
Anemia
|
Yes (40)
|
8 (20)
|
0.002
|
No (43)
|
0 (0)
|
HemolyticAnemia
|
Yes (15)
|
2 (13.3)
|
0.592
|
No (68)
|
6 (8.8)
|
Thrombocytopenia
|
Yes (53)
|
5 (9.4)
|
0.933
|
No (30)
|
3 (10)
|
Table-3: Association
between co-morbidities and mortality
Factors
|
Group
|
Mortality
|
p Value
|
Diabetes Mellitus
|
Yes (18)
|
5 (27.8)
|
0.003
|
No (65)
|
3 (4.6)
|
Systemic Hypertension
|
Yes (18)
|
2 (11.1)
|
0.811
|
No (65)
|
6 (9.2)
|
ADS
|
Yes (15)
|
5 (33.3)
|
0.001
|
No (68)
|
3 (4.4)
|
CLD
|
Yes (10)
|
4 (40%)
|
0.001
|
No (73)
|
4 (5.5)
|
Bronchial Asthma
|
Yes (3)
|
1 (33.3)
|
0.157
|
No (80)
|
7 (8.8)
|
Table-4: Comparison of
continuous variables in survivors and non-survivors
Variable
|
Group
|
Mean ± SD
|
p Value
|
AGE
(Years)
|
Non-Survivors
|
55.38
± 16.19
|
0.238
|
Survivors
|
47.77
± 14.87
|
CREATININE
|
Non-Survivors
|
2.61
± 1.22
|
0.472
|
Survivors
|
2.61
± 2.02
|
TOTAL
BILIRUBIN
|
Non-Survivors
|
9.04
± 7.66
|
0.011
|
Survivors
|
3.75
± 5.08
|
AST
|
Non-Survivors
|
339.74
± 567.83
|
0.010
|
Survivors
|
114.83
± 190.32
|
ALT
|
Non-Survivors
|
137.88
± 161.95
|
0.369
|
Survivors
|
111.17
± 299.88
|
TOTAL
COUNT
|
Non-Survivors
|
13.22
± 5.17
|
0.413
|
Survivors
|
12.58
± 6.38
|
HEMOGLOBIN
|
Non-Survivors
|
10.13
± 1.81
|
0.006
|
Survivors
|
12.41
± 2.35
|
PLATELETS
|
Non-Survivors
|
92.98
± 63.36
|
0.694
|
Survivors
|
125.31
± 108.09
|
CREATININE
KINASE
|
Non-Survivors
|
126.18
± 77.66
|
0.554
|
Survivors
|
618.11
± 1517.27
|
Graph-1 : Association
between Oliguria and Mortality
Graph-2 : Association
between Hypotension and Mortality
Investigations at admission showed that even though thrombocytopenia is
commonly seen as one of the main features of Leptospirosis, it was only
present in 63.9% of patients at admission. Thus suspicion of
Leptospirosis must start even before thrombocytopenia develops. In this
particular group, elevated bilirubin was as common a feature as
thrombocytopenia (63.9%) closely followed by transaminitis (57.8%),
Leukocytosis (51.8%) and anemia (48.2%). Hypokalemia (30.1%) and
elevated CK (30.1%) were also present in about 1/3 of our study
population.Additional investigations such as ECG and Chest x-ray were
also taken. Most common abnormality in them was the presence of
alveolar infiltrates on Chest x-ray (10%). Epidemiological
characteristics such as co-morbidities were also taken into account in
this study and the most common co-morbidities present in the study
population were Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (21.7%) and Systemic
Hypertension (21.7%). Other common co-morbidities found in this set of
included Alcohol Dependence Syndrome (18.1%) and Chronic Liver Disease
(12%).
Next, association between mortality and different factors was analysed.
As per the primary objectives, associa-tion between oliguric renal
failure and hypotension and mortality was looked for. Of the 30
patients who pre-sented with oliguric renal failure, 6 (20%) succumbed
to the illness while 24 (80%) survived. Of 52 patients who presented
without oliguric renal failure 2 (3.8%) succumbed to the illness while
51 (96.2%) survived. The p value is 0.016 (i.e., p < 0.05) as
per Chi Square test thus the association between oliguric renal failure
and mortality is significant. At the same time, of the 30 patients with
hypotension who were included in the study, 5 (16.7%) succumbed to
illness and 25 (83.3%) survived. In patient who presented with normal
blood pressure levels, 3 (5.7%) died while 50 (94.3%) survived.
However, even though the mortality rate was higher in those with
hypotension, on analysing the data with Chi-Square test, it was found
to be a non-significant association since p value was 0.103 (p>
0.05).
Though the primary objectives of this study were to study the
association between both oliguric renal failure and hypotension and
mortality, data on other factors was also collected and analysed for
association with death. Of these other factors, patients who had
elevated bilirubin succumbed to Leptospirosis 15.1% of the time. Of
those with normal bilirubin levels at presentation, all survived the
illness. This association is significant as per Chi Square Test which
shows a p value of 0.025 (i.e., p < 0.05). When looking for the
exact values, non-survivors were found to have Mean total bilirubin of
9.044 ± 7.661 as compared to survivors who had a mean total
bilirubin of 3.752 ± 5.087.That was a significant variation
in the bilirubin levels with a p value of 0.011 as per t test. Another
derangement commonly found in this study population was elevation of
AST, which again showed indicated derangement in liver function. The
mean AST is non-survivors was 339.74 ± 567.830 as compared
to the 114.83 ± 190.327 in survivors. As per the T test, p
value of this comparison is 0.010 making it significant.
Similarly those who presented with anemia were more likely to die due
to Leptospirosis. Twenty percent of the patient who presented with
anemia passed away while 80% survived. However all those presented with
normal hemoglobin levels survived. With a p value of 0.002, this was
significantly associated with mortality. The data was analysed to see
exactly the difference in hemoglobin between survivors and
non-survivors. In those who passed away mean hemoglobin was 10.138
± 1.8189 while in those who survived it was 12.417
± 2.3554. Thus a p value of 0.006 was obtained which was
significant.
In this study, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and morality had a significant
association (p value 0.003) with diabetics passing away at a rate of
27.8% while only 4.6% of non-diabetics passed away. A similar finding
(significant association p value 0.001) has come for Alcohol Dependence
Syndrome with one third of patients who are ethanol dependent
succumbing to the illness while in those who did not consume only 4.4%
succumbed. Another chronic disease which significantly increased the
likelihood of mortality in Leptospirosis was Chronic Liver Disease (p
value 0.001). Forty percent of CLD patients passed away while only 5.5%
of non-CLD patients succumbed.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to find the mortality predictors of
Leptospirosis. The study focused on the admis-sion parameters of
multiple patients who were later diagnosed to have Leptospirosis.
Specific importance was given to the ability of hypotension or oliguric
renal failure to predict mortality as a previous study had come to the
conclusion that these two were the most significant factors involved in
prognostication. Other baseline fac-tors including the epidemiological,
clinical features, and investigations were also analysed for
significant factors. The point was to find those markers which would
indicate to the admitting doctor that a patient with Lep-tospirosis
would have a more guarded prognosis and would need closer observation.
Previous studies showed a varied amount of possible risk factors for
death in various populations and in various studies. The need to
con-firm or refute the multiple factors already proposed was an
objective as well as look for any variation in the local population.
On analysis for the primary objective i.e.oliguric renal failure and
hypotension, it was found that oliguric renal failure was significantly
associated with mortality in Leptospirosis patients (p value 0.016)
while hypotension was not significantly associated (p value 0.103).
These two factors were chosen after reviewing multiple pre-vious
studies [9]. In this study, these two factors were found to have the
most significant association with death. However, in the current study
while oliguric renal failure has again been found to be a significant
predictor of mortality, hypotension was not significantly associated
with death.
Oliguric renal failure has consistently been found as a significantly
associated predictor of mortality over several literature reviews and
studies [6,10, 11], as well as many other studies [12] [13] [14].
However it should be noted that none of the studies done on
Leptospirosis in the same area have found oliguric renal failure to be
significantly associated with mortality [8, 16]. Hypotension on the
other hand, even though occasionally found to be significantly
associated with death in Leptospirosis infection [6] [9] [10], is not
found as often as renal failure. Previous studies in the same region as
the current study have not associated it with mortality [8] [16].
In addition, the other baseline variables were also analysed and among
those other significantly associated risk factors were found. These
included laboratory parameters such as elevated bilirubin, anemia as
well as pre-existing conditions such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus,
Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and Chronic Liver Dis-ease.15.1% of
patients with elevated bilirubin died (p value 0.025) with no patients
with normal bilirubin passed away. The mean value of total bilirubin in
non -survivors was 9.04 ± 7.66 as compared to the total
bilirubin in survivors which was only 3.75 ± 5.08. Another
liver function abnormality which was significantly associated with
death was elevation of the liver enzymes AST. In non -survivors the
mean AST was 339.74 ± 567.83 while in survivors it was
114.83 ± 190.32, with a p value of 0.010. The other
laboratory parameter that could be used a mortality predictor is anemia
with 20% of patients with anemia passing away due to Leptospirosis (p
value 0.002) but in those without anemia no one passed away. Meanwhile,
the mean hemoglobin of non-survivors was only 10.13 ± 1.81
in comparison to survivors who had a Mean hemoglobin of 12.41
± 2.35 showing a significant association with a p value of
0.006. Even though previous studies have suggested similar results,
with features such as jaundice [12] and liver enzyme ratio [7] being
significant, these factors have not been as extensively studied.
Pre-existing conditions which predisposed the patients to death after
Leptospira infection included Type 2 Di-abetes Mellitus, Alcohol
Dependence Syndrome, and Chronic Liver Disease. Twenty-seven percent of
people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Leptospirosis passed away
while only 4.6% of non-diabetics with Leptospi-rosis passed away. At
the same time, 33.3% of Alcohol Dependence Syndrome patients with
Leptospirosis in this study passed away as compared to 4.4% of patients
who did not have this illness in Chronic Liver Disease 40% of patients
who had Leptospirosis died while only 5.5% patients without it died.
Again, as with other sec-ondary factors which have been found to be
significant, these factors have been mentioned occasionally in other
studies [6], but the association has not been extensively evaluated.
Thus this study has helped to add to the growing amount of data making
oliguric renal failure one of the signifi-cant mortality predictors of
Leptospirosis. While it did not confirm hypotension as a significant
cause of death, it helped to find other significant variables which are
as yet understudied. These results are relevant both practi-cally as
well as academically. From a practical stand point, the further
re-enforcement of oliguric renal failure as one of the significant
predictors of death in Leptospirosis will help admitting physicians
decide on ICU care and aggressive management including need for
hemodialysis. At the same time, academically, less researched variables
such as anemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, etc have been found which can
be the focus of future studies.
Conclusion
Oliguric renal failure is significantly associated with mortality in
Leptospirosis. Other factors found to be signif-icantly associated with
mortality in Leptospirosis include elevated bilirubin, AST levels,
anemia, Type 2 Di-abetes Mellitus, Alcohol Dependence Syndrome, and
Chronic Liver Disease.Hypotension is not significantly associated with
mortality in Leptospirosis. These factors can be used to make decisions
in management, includ-ing need for ICU stabilisation, by the admitting
physician. Aggressive treatment of these factors can help reduce
mortality in Leptospirosis. The Oliguric renal failure is a major cause
of mortality in leptospirosis. Hemodialysis should be initiated in
leptospirosis presenting with reduced urine output without any delay.
Our study suggests an aggressive management of leptospirosis cases
presenting with Oliguric renal failure. In-itiating hemodialysis on
immediate priority basis at the time of presentation to causality
reduces the mortality rate. Close monitoring of hematology factors,
liver function and renal functions should be done for effective follow
upandbetter patient care.
Authors Contribution
Dr. Arun Divakar, M.D
Assistant Professor, Department of General Medicine
Study Concept, Data Analysis and Manuscript writing
Dr. M. Gopala Krishna Pillai, M.D
HOD & Professor Department of General
Medicine Study Concept, Data Analysis,
Manuscript Review and Corresponding Author
Dr. Elizabeth Thomas
Post Graduate Student (M.D )
Department of General Medicine
Study Concept, Data Analysis and Manuscript writ-ing.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Haake DA, Levett PN. Leptospirosis in humans. Curr Top Microbiol
Immunol. 2015;387:65-97. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45059-8_5. [PubMed]
2. Longo DL, Fauci AS, Kasper DL, et al Editors. Harrison’s
Principles of Internal Medicine. 19th edition. “In-fectious
Diseases”, “Leptospirosis” p.1392.
3. Didier Musso and Bernard La Scola. Laboratory diagnosis of
Leptospirosis. A challenge. Journal of Microbi-ology, Immunology and
Infection, 2013-08-01, Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 245-252.
DOI:10.1016/j.jmii.2013.03.001.
4. Senior K. Leptospirosis and Weil’s syndrome:
Cause for concern? Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2010 Dec; 10(12):823-4. [PubMed]
5. Walker BR, Colledge NR, Raiston SH, et al, Editors, Davidson's
Principles and Practice of Medicine, 22nd Edition,
“Infectious disease – Leptospirosis”
p.336-338. [PubMed]
6. Rajapakse S, Rodrigo C, Haniffa R. Developing a clinically relevant
classification to predict mortality in se-vere leptospirosis. J Emerg
Trauma Shock. 2010 Jul;3(3):213-9. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.66519. [PubMed]
7. Goswami RP, Goswami RP, Basu A, Tripathi SK, Chakrabarti S,
Chattopadhyay I. Predictors of mortality in leptospirosis: an
observational study from two hospitals in Kolkata, eastern India. Trans
R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2014 Dec;108(12):791-6. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru144.
Epub 2014 Oct 30. [PubMed]
8. Pappachan MJ, Mathew S, Aravindan KP, Khader A, Bharghavan PV,
Kareem MM, Tuteja U, Shukla J, Ba-tra HV. Risk factors for mortality in
patients with leptospirosis during an epidemic in northern Kerala. Natl
Med J India. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):240-2. [PubMed]
9. Panaphut T, Domrongkitchaiporn S, Thinkamrop B. Prognostic factors
of death in leptospirosis: a prospective cohort study in KhonKaen,
Thailand. Int J Infect Dis. 2002 Mar;6(1):52-9. [PubMed]
10. Prabhu M, Valsalan R, Ramachandran B., Prognostic markers and
outcomes in severe leptospirosis in a tertiary hospital from south
India. International Journal of Infectious Diseases,
2010-03-01, Volume 14, Pages e389-e389. DOI:
10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.485.
11. Spichler AS, Vilaça PJ, Athanazio DA, Albuquerque JO,
Buzzar M, Castro B, Seguro A, Vinetz JM. Predic-tors of lethality in
severeleptospirosis in urban Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008
Dec;79(6):911-4. [PubMed]
12. Taylor AJ, Paris DH, Newton PN, A Systematic Review of the
Mortality from Untreated Leptospirosis PLoSNegl
Trop Dis - June1, 2015; 9(6); Published: August14, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003971. [PubMed]
13. Ko AI, Galvão Reis M, Ribeiro Dourado CM, Johnson WD Jr,
Riley LW. Urban epidemic of severe leptos-pirosis in Brazil. Salvador
Leptospirosis Study Group. Lancet. 1999 Sep 4;354(9181):820-5. [PubMed]
14. Dupont H, Dupont-Perdrizet D, Perie JL, Zehner-Hansen S, Jarrige B,
DaijardinJB.Leptospirosis: prognostic factorsassociated with mortality.
Clin Infect Dis.1997 Sep;25(3):720-4. [PubMed]
15. Unnikrishnan, Dilip;Pisharody, Ramdas; Vijayalakshmy, N,
Prognostic ‘Factors in Leptospiroses: A study-from
Kerala, India, InfectiousDiseases in ClinicalPractice:May
2005-Volume-13-Issue 3- pp 104-107.
How to cite this article?
Arun Divakar, M.G.K. Pillai, Elizbeth Thomas. Clinical profile of
mortality predictors in Leptospirosis: a prospective study in a
tertiary care center. Int J Med Res Rev
2017;5(09):857-864.doi:10.17511/ijmrr. 2017.i09.05.