Pattern of admissions into the newborn unit of university of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Akpanl M.U.1, Nyong E.E.2

1Mkpouto U. Akpan., 2Eno E. Nyong, both authors are affiliated with Department of Paediatrics, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa-Ibom State, Nigeria

Address for Correspondence: Dr Mkpouto Udeme Akpan, Department of Paediatrics, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. E- mail: mkpoutoakpan@yahoo.com



Abstract

Background: Neonatal conditions have been noted to contribute significantly to under-five mortality rate. Knowledge of its pattern in our environment will help in planning for improved health care delivery. Aim: To determine the morbidity and mortality patterns of patients admitted into the neonatal unit of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients admitted into the neonatal unit of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital over a period of twelve months from 1st of January, 2011 to 31st of December, 2011 was carried out. Information extracted from the records included age at presentation, gender, duration of hospitalisation, main diagnosis, and outcome. Results: A total of 997 neonates were admitted during the period of review. The male to female ratio was 1.1:1 in favour of the males (529:468). Of these, the commonest diagnoses were: neonatal sepsis 253(25.38%), prematurity 188(18.86%), neonatal jaundice 181(18.15%) and birth asphyxia 137(13.74%). Mean duration of admission was9 days. The overall mortality rate was 12.9% with a male to female death ratio of1.3:1. Gender-related fatality rate was higher in males than females at 13.8% and 12.0% respectively. Majority (80.6%) of the deaths occur among the out-born while (43.4%) occur within 24 hours of admission. Conclusion: Most of the neonatal deaths were from preventable diseases. Good antenatal care is advocated for all pregnant women. This will help in screening, identification and timely referral of high risk pregnant women from primary health facilities to secondary and tertiary health facilities.

Keywords: Morbidity, Mortality, University of Uyo teaching hospital, Neonates



Manuscript received: 8th September 2017, Reviewed: 17th September 2017
Author Corrected: 25th September 2017, Accepted for Publication: 30th September 2017

Introduction

The neonatal period is the most fragile and vulnerable period of life due to the large number of problems and diseases which the newborn is likely to face. Neonatal morbidity and mortality contributes significantly to under-five morbidity and mortality in Sub-Saharan African, accounting for 40% of the under-five mortality rate worldwide [1]. Approximately three quarters of neonatal deaths occur in the first week of life with more than one quarter occurring within the first twenty-four hours [2]. This is so because the first week of life is the transitional period from intrauterine to extra-uterine life.

Causes of neonatal deaths vary greatly from country to country. Worldwide, the common causes of neonatal death include infections (36%), prematurity(28%), and birth asphyxia(23%) [3]. In Nigeria, the common causes and their proportions vary depending on the geographical location but birth asphyxia, prematurity and neonatal sepsis have been reported as the common causes [4-8]. Majority of these causes are preventable. Poor maternal health, adverse social conditions, inadequate care during pregnancy, delivery and the immediate postpartum period coupled with poor infrastructure of the primary health facilities and cultural beliefs are some of the contributory factors. Knowledge of the pattern of admissions and its outcome will help policymakers to plan preventive measures that will help to reduce mortality and morbidity during this vulnerable period of life. This study sought to know the pattern of morbidity and mortality as there is no known study in our environment.

Materials and Methods

Study design and setting:- This retrospective study was conducted in the newborn unit of the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo. The newborn unit of this hospital is made up of two subunits; the Special Care Babies Unit (SCBU) and the Sick Babies Unit (SBU). SCBU admits all inborn babies whose mothers had antenatal care either in University of Uyo Teaching Hospital (UUTH) or any other government registered health facility and delivered in UUTH while SBU caters for all out-born and also interfered cases that later delivered in UUTH.

The Newborn Unit accepts all babies between the ages of zero and twenty- eight days. The unit is well equipped with cots, radiant warmers, incubators and phototherapy machines. It also has fullcomplement of staff ranging from neonatal nurses, registered nurses/midwives, Resident doctors and two Consultant Neonatologists.

The preterm babies are usually nursed in incubators and the very sick newborns, extremely or very low birth weight babies are cared for with the use of radiant warmers, phototherapy units and naso-gastric tube feeding. Mothers’ milk is used to feed most of the babies and formula feeds are only used when it is not possible to get mothers’ milk. Oxygen is also given to babies who are in need. Weighing scales and infantometer are used to measure the weight and length of these neonates respectively while measuring tape is used to measure the occipito-frontal circumference.

Babies with birthweight of less than 2500grams are considered as low birth weight, less than 1500grams as very low birth weight while less than 1000grams, extreme low birth weight [9].

Using the gestational age, a preterm delivery was considered if the baby was delivered before thirty-seven completed weeks while post term delivery was considered if the baby was delivered after forty-two completed weeks.

UUTH is one of the two tertiary health facility in Akwa-Ibom state, the second being the Ibom international specialist hospital. It serves as a referral centre to people within and outside Akwa-Ibom State. It is located about six kilometres from the heart of Uyo, the capital of Akwa-Ibom State.

Inclusion criteria- All babies aged 0-28days admitted into the newborn unit from 1st of January, 2011 to 31st of December, 2011.

Exclusion criteria- Babies older than 28days and those not admitted into the newborn unit.

Participants- Babies who were admitted into the newborn unit.

Variables- Age (days) at admission, gender, main diagnosis, duration of hospitalisation, outcome

Data source- Case notes of all patients admitted into the Newborn Unit during the study period were retrieved. Information extracted included the following: age at presentation, gender, diagnosis, age at discharge and outcome of admission.

Bias- None was anticipated nor observed in the study.

Study size- A total of nine hundred and ninety-seven neonates were studied.

Statistical methods- The data was analysed using SPSS Package 20. Frequencies were drawn using tables, compared using Chi-square; and means using the student t-test. p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results

A total of nine hundred and ninety-seven neonates were admitted during the period under review of which 521 were admitted into SBU and 476 into SCBU. Five hundred and twenty-nine (53.1%) were males and 468 (46.9%) were females giving a male to female ratio of 1.1:1. Four hundred and seventy-six were inborn while 521 were out-born. Eight hundred and thirty neonates were admitted before the age of seven days and 167 were admitted after the age of 7days. A greater number of the neonates admitted into SBU were older than 7days old while majority of the admissions in SCBU were less than 7days of age and this was statistically significant with p-value<0.01. This is shown in table 1

Table-1: Shows the age of the neonates at presentation in the hospital
    

 

Ward

Admitted

 

 

 

Age at presentation

SBU (521)

SCBU (476)

Total(997)

Χ2

p-value

<7days

372

458

830

 

 

7days or more

149

18

167

109.86

<0.01

Total

521

476

997

 

 


Diagnosis at presentation: Table 2 shows the pattern of admissions in the newborn unit. The four commonest diagnoses were: neonatal sepsis 253(25.38%), prematurity 188(18.86%), neonatal jaundice 181(18.15%) and birth asphyxia 137(13.74%). Other disease conditions were: HIV exposed 8(0.8%), hypoglycaemia 4(0.4%), infant of diabetic mother 11(1.1%), infant of rhesus negative mother 3(0.3%), intestinal obstruction 8(0.8%), intra-uterine growth restriction 2(0.2%), local infection 17(1.7%), low birth weight 4(0.4%), macrosomic baby 32 (3.21%), meconium aspiration syndrome 18(0.18%), neonatal meningitis 14(1.4%), neonatal seizure 7(0.7%), neonatal tetanus 11(1.1%), pneumonia 13(1.3%), post-date baby 2(0.2%), respiratory distress syndrome 3(0.3%), severe anaemia 1(0.1%), spinal bifida 8(0.8%), transient tachypnoea of newborn 5(0.5%). Neonatal sepsis was noted as the commonest presentation among out-born as well as inborn neonates.

Table-2: Shows the pattern of admission into newborn unit

Disease condition

SBU

SCBU

Total

Percentage

Malaria

3

8

11

0.11

Birth asphyxia

75

62

137

13.74

Birth trauma

4

3

7

0.7

Congenital abnormality

34

6

40

4.01

HIV exposed

4

4

8

0.8

Infant of diabetic mother

-

11

11

1.1

Intestinal obstruction

8

-

8

0.8

Local infection(omphalitis)

13

4

17

1.71

Macrosomic baby

-

32

32

3.21

Meconium/liquor aspiration

4

14

18

1.8

Neonatal meningitis

14

-

14

1.4

Neonatal jaundice

68

113

181

18.15

Neonatal seizure

6

1

7

0.7

Neonatal tetanus

11

-

11

1.1

pneumonia

12

1

13

1.3

prematurity

108

80

188

18.86

Neonatal sepsis

130

123

253

25.38

Spinal bifida

8

-

8

0.8

Others

17

16

33

3.31

Total

521

476

997

100


Duration of hospitalization: Period of hospitalization ranged from one hour to 62days with a mean duration of 9days. Eighty-six out of 134 patients that were hospitalized for less than 24hours were admitted in SBU and 48 in SCBU. There were significantly more admissions in SBU than SCBU that spent <24hours in hospital (p=0.003). This is shown in table 3.

Table-3: Shows the duration of hospital in relationship to the ward the patient was admitted.
    

 

Ward

Admitted

 

 

 

Duration of admission

SBU

SCBU

Total

Χ2

p-value

<24 hours

86

48

134

 

 

>24 hours

435

428

883

8.82

0.003

Total

521

476

997

 

 


Outcome: Of the total number of admissions, 129 patients died. The death rate was higher among the out-born than the inborn. Also, a higher number of out-born left the hospital against medical advice. A significantly higher number of inborn recovered and were discharged home (p=<0.01). This is shown in table 4.

Table-4: Shows the association between care outcome of admission and ward of admission
    

 

Ward

Admitted

 

 

 

Outcome

SBU

SCBU

Total

Χ2

p-value

Discharged

350

441

791

 

 

Died

104

25

129

99.22

<0.01

Left against medical advice

67

10

77

 

 

Total

521

476

997

 

 


Out of 129 patients that died, 56 (43.4%) died within 24 hours of admission and 73 (56.6%) died after 24 hours of admission. Among the patients that left against medical advice, 11 (14.28%) left within 24 hours of admission while 66 (85.72%) left after 24 hours of admission. There was significantly more deaths among those hospitalized for <24hours than among those hospitalized for >24hours (p=0.003). This is shown in table 5.

Table-5: Shows the association between care outcome and duration of hospitalization
    

 

Duration of

Admission

 

 

 

Outcome

<24hours

>24hours

Total

Χ2

p-value

Discharged

67

724

791

 

 

Died

56

73

129

116.44

<0.01

Left against medical advice

11

66

77

 

 

Total

134

863

997

 

 


Table 6 shows the different causes of death among the 129 neonates that died. The four commonest causes of death were prematurity 44, birth asphyxia 26, neonatal sepsis 22 and congenital abnormality 12.

Table-6: Shows the causes of death

Cause of death

N (129)

Percentage

Birth asphyxia

26

20.16

Congenital abnormality

12

9.3

Intestinal obstruction

1

0.76

Local infection(omphalitis)

2

1.55

Low birth weight

1

0.76

Meconium aspiration

1

0.76

Neonatal meningitis

2

1.55

Neonatal jaundice

5

3.88

Neonatal seizure

1

0.76

Neonatal tetanus

6

4.65

Pneumonia

2

1.55

Prematurity

44

34.11

Respiratory distress syndrome

1

0.76

Neonatal sepsis

22

17.05

Spinal bifida

3

2.33

Total

129

100


Discussion

This is the first clinical audit of admissions into the neonatal unit of this hospital since it was established in 1997. The male preponderance observed in this study is consistent with other studies within and outside our environment [4, 10-11].This indicates that male newborns are more vulnerable during the neonatal period and this agrees with the well described biological survival of females in the neonatal period [12].It could also be as a reflection of male child preference which is seen in some culture [13]. In our traditional community, male children are preferred and so are more valued and catered for than the female. It therefore means that sick male children are taken to the best health facilities such as tertiary hospitals so as to increase their chances of survival. This observation is in contrast with findings from a study in Karachi, India where female neonates outnumbered the males [14].

The finding that majority of the patients were admitted within the first seven days of life has been reported in other studies [4]. This is because the first week of life is a transitional period from intrauterine to extra-uterine life and is considered to be the most fragile and vulnerable period.

Out-born babies were more in number than the inborn (52.3% and 47.7% respectively). This is comparable to 53.54 and 46.46 reported by Rakholia et al [11] in India and 61.8% and 38.2% reported by Orimadegun et al in Southwest Nigeria [15].

Neonatal sepsis which was observed as the commonest cause of neonatal admission is similar to what is obtained worldwide. Neonatal sepsis was responsible for 25.38% of neonatal admissions. This was lower than 37.1% obtained by Torma et al [6] in Northern Nigeria. Ugwu [16] in her study in a tertiary care institution in South-south Nigeria reported a rate of 35.3%. This could be as a result of the fact that all children with presumed sepsis were included in this group. In contrast, Ekwochi et al[4] in their study in South-eastern reported that neonatal sepsis was the third commonest cause of neonatal admission. The commonest cause of neonatal admission in their study was peri-natal asphyxia. The other common causes of neonatal admissions in the present study were prematurity, neonatal jaundice and birth asphyxia and these were similar to reports by other authors in Nigeria [6,7].

Mortality rate of 12.9%was obtained in the present study. This is lower than 20.3% reported by Ugwu [16] and Omoigberale et al [17] from two different tertiary health care centres in Southern Nigeria. More males died in the present study with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Gender-related fatality rate was also higher in males than females at 13.8% and 11.9% respectively. This is similar to report from other centres in Southern Nigeria[16]. The finding supports the fact that male newborns are more vulnerable during the neonatal period. The commonest causes of death were prematurity, birth asphyxia and neonatal sepsis which are similar to reports by other studies in Nigeria [4-7,16-17].

Conclusion

This study adds to the existing knowledge that most of the neonatal deaths were from preventable diseases. Good ante natal care is advocated for all pregnant women. This will help in screening, identification and timely referral of high risk pregnant women from primary health facilities to secondary and tertiary health facilities

Authors Contributions- MUA conceived and designed the study, EEN collected, analysed and interpreted the data, while MUA drafted the article as well as carried out a critical revision of the article. Final approval of the version to be published was by MUA and EEN.

Funding: Nil, Conflict of interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB: Yes

References


1. Lerberghe WV, Manuel A, Matthews Z, Wolfheim CI. Make every mother and child count. World Health Report, 2005. Genevas: World Health Organization, WHO Press; 2005. P9.

2. Lawn JE, Cousens S, Zupan J. Lancet Neonatal Survival Steering Team. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900.
[PubMed]

3. Lawn JE, Cousens SN, Wilczynska K. Estimating the causes of four million neonatal deaths in the year2000: statistical annex. In: The world health report 2005. Geneva: WHO; 2005.
[PubMed]

4. Ekwochi U, Ndu IK, Nwokoye IC, Ezenwosu OU, Amadi OF, Osuorah D1. Pattern of morbidity and mortality of newborns admitted into the sick and special care baby unit of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu state. Niger J ClinPract. 2014 May-Jun;17(3):346-51. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.130238.
[PubMed]

5. Eke CB, Ezomike UO, Korie FC, Chukwudi N, Ukpabi IK. Pattern of neonatal mortality in a tertiary health facility in Umuahia, South East, Nigeria. Int J Trop Disease and Health. 2014; 4(2): 136-46. DOI-109734/IJDH/2014/4985.


6. Torma BO, Ige OO, AbokII, Onwuanaku C, Abah RO. Pattern of neonatal admissions and outcome in a tertiary institution in north central Nigeria. J Med Trop. 2013; 15(2): 121-5.


7. Okechukwu AA, Achonwa A. Morbidity and mortality patterns of admissions into the Special Care Baby Unit of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, Nigeria. Niger J ClinPract. 2009 Dec;12(4):389-94.


8. Adebami OJ, Joel-Medewase AVI, Oyedeji OA, Oyedeji GA. A review of neonatal admissions in Osogbo, South-western Nigeria. Nig Hosp Pract. 2010; 5(3-4): http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/nhp.v5i3-4.57848.


9. Southgate WM, Pittard WB. Classification and physical examination of the newborn infant in: Klaus and Fanaroff, eds. Care of the high risk neonates, 5th ed. Philadelphia. W. B. Saunders company; 2001: pp 100-29.


10. Eke EU, Modupe OO. Pattern of diseases and care outcomes of neonates admitted in Special Care Baby Unit of University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria from 2007 to 2011. IOSR J of Nursing and Health Sci. 2015;4(3): 62-71. DOI: 10. 9790/1959-04316271.


11. Rakholia R, Rawat V, Bano M, Singh G. Neonatal morbidity and mortality of sick newborns admitted in a teaching hospital of Uttarakhad. Chrismed J Health and Research. 2014; 1(4): 228-34.


12. Salem M, Ali M, Anwer J, Babar MI, Rafi M, Mahamood R et al. Clinical audit of neonatal admissions in a tertiary care hospital. JSZMC 2011; 2(4): 231-35.


13. Doctor AV, Bairagi R, Findley SE, Helleringer S, Dahiru T. Northern Nigeria Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Programme: Selected analyses from population-based baseline survey. The open demography Journal 2011; 4: 11-21.


14. Aijaz N, Huda N, Kauzar S. Disease burden of NICU at a tertiary care hospital, Karachi. J Dow university of Health Sciences Karachi. 2012; (6)1: 32-5.


15. Orimadegun AE, Akinbami FO, Tongo OO, Okereke JO. Comparison of neonates born outside and inside hospitals in a children emergency unit, southwest of Nigeria. PediatrEmergCare. 2008 Jun;24(6):354-8. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318177a73c.
[PubMed]

16. Ugwu GI. Pattern of morbidity and mortality in the newborn special care unit in a tertiary institution in the Niger Delta region of Nigeria: A prospective study. Glob Adv Res J Med Sci. 2012; 1: 133-8.


17. Omoigberale AI, Sadoh WE, Nwaneri DU. A4year review of neonatal outcome at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City. Niger J ClinPract. 2010; 13: 21-5.




How to cite this article?

Akpanl M.U, Nyong E.E. Pattern of admissions into the newborn unit of university of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. Int J Med Res Rev 2017;5(09):851-856.doi:10.17511/ijmrr. 2017.i09.04.