Inhibitory effects of copper on
bacterial and fungal growth
Khan M.A.1, Yaqoob S.2
1Dr. Mohsin Ali Khan, Secretary E.E.T, 2Dr. ShadmaYaqoob, Associate
Professor, both authors are attached with Department of Microbiology,
Era's Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, UP, India
Address for Correspondence:
Dr. Shadma Yaqoob, 20/253, Sector-20, Indra Nagar, Lucknow.
drshadmayaqoob@yahoo.com
Abstract
Introduction:
Researchers conducted a literature, technology and patent search that
traced the history of understanding the “bacteriostatic and
sanitizing properties of copper and copper alloy surfaces”
which demonstrated that copper, in very small quantities, has the
Copper alloy surfaces have intrinsic properties to destroy a wide range
of microorganisms. Today copper, in the form of plumbing tube, copper
or copper-alloy surfaces proved to be a significant step in decreasing
the fungal and bacterial infections in hospitals. Aims and objective:
To know the bactericidal and fungicidal properties of copper for its
implication in various areas in preventing nosocomial infection. Material and Methods:
Eight sterile petri dishes (four for Blood agar media and four for
MacConkey agar media) and two sterile 30 ml screw capped bottles (for
Sabouraud’s Dextrose agar media) were taken. Sterile copper
discs were placed in four plates of Blood agar and MacConkey agar media
and other four plates were without copper discs. In the same way copper
piece was placed in one of the bottle with Sabourauds Dextrose agar
media. Pure growths of E. coli, Klebsiella and candida were inoculated
and incubated. Results:
The plates with bacterial and fungal growth were reported accordingly.
The growth was significantly reduced in Plates and bottles with copper
discs. Conclusion:
Copper alloy surfaces have intrinsic properties to destroy a wide range
of microorganisms so copper’s use in water supplies and
surfaces are recommended.
Keywords:
Copper, Bactericidal, Fungicidal, Nosocomial infection
Manuscript received: 4th
April 2017, Reviewed:
14th April 2017
Author Corrected: 22nd
April 2017, Accepted for
Publication: 29th April 2017
Introduction
Metal ions, either alone or in complexes, have been used for centuries
to disinfect fluids, solids and tissues [1,2]. The ancient Greeks of
the pre-Christian era of Hypocrates (400 BC) were the first to discover
the sanitizing power of copper thousands of years ago. They prescribed
copper for pulmonary diseases and for purifying drinking water. The
oldest recorded medical use of copper is mentioned in the Smith
Papyrus, one of the oldest books known. Egyptian medical text, written
between 2600 and 2200 B.C., describes the application of copper to
sterilize chest wounds and drinking water. The use of copper in
medicine became widespread in the 19th and early 20th century [3].
Metals such as silver, iron, and copper could be used for environmental
control, disinfection of water, or reusable medical devices or
incorporated into medical devices (e.g., intravascular catheters) [4].
The bactericidal, fungicidal and, to some extent, virucidal properties
of copper, copper compounds and alloys of copper have been known for
many years. There is evidence indicating “bacteriostatic and
sanitizing properties of copper and copper alloy surfaces”.
Certain studies shows that the copper tubing used for in-hospital water
transport and treatment systems may help to reduce the numbers of
undesirable bacteria. Similarly, the idea of using copper vessels to
render water drinkable has been revived only very recently as a
low-cost alternative for developing countries [5]. Currently, there is
an intense interest in the use of copper as a self-sanitizing material,
Mechanisms of antibacterial action of copper- The antimicrobial
properties of copper are still under active investigation. Molecular
mechanisms responsible for the antibacterial action of copper have been
a subject of intensive research. Scientists are also actively
demonstrating the intrinsic efficacies of copper alloy touch surfaces
to destroy a wide range of microorganisms that threaten public health.
In 1973, researchers at Battelle Columbus Laboratories conducted a
comprehensive literature, technology and patent search that traced the
history of understanding the “bacteriostatic and sanitizing
properties of copper and copper alloy surfaces” which
demonstrated that copper, in very small quantities, has the power to
control a wide range of molds, fungi, algae and harmful microbes [6].
Numerous papers are there with different investigations showing
copper’s antimicrobial mechanisms and efficacy of
copper’s action on microbes. The authors noted that the
antimicrobial mechanisms are very complex and take place in many ways,
both inside cells and in the interstitial spaces between cells. Some of
the molecular mechanisms mentioned by researchers are:
• The copper altered the
3-dimensional structure of proteins and disrupt the enzyme structures
resulting in inactivation of bacteria or viruses [7, 8].
• Copper produces deleterious
effects in superoxide radicals, generating OH- radicals, thereby
causing “multiple hit damage” at target sites [9].
• Copper with lipids produces
holes in the cell membranes damaging the integrity of cell and leaking
of essential nutrients leading to cell deaths [10 ,11]
Many recent publications also showed that microorganisms are rapidly
killed on metallic copper surfaces by ‘ contact
killing’ mechanism [12].
Copper alloy surfaces have intrinsic properties to destroy a wide range
of microorganisms. In the interest of protecting public health,
especially in healthcare environments many studies have been conducted
in the past ten years regarding copper’s efficacy to destroy
microorganisms. The bactericidal, fungicidal and, to some extent,
virucidal properties of copper, copper compounds
and alloys of copper have been known for many years. Indeed, the
earliest medical texts refer to the use of copper compounds for
wound-healing, i.e., sterilization of wounds [3]. There is evidence
indicating that copper tubing used for in-hospital water transport and
treatment systems may help to reduce the numbers of undesirable
bacteria present in water. Today, copper, in the form of plumbing tube,
copper or copper-alloy surfaces,has shown it is a significant step to
the contraction of fungal and bacterial disease in healthcare
facilities. The three major areas where copper has been used to stem
nosocomial infections include the sanitation of the water supply, of
air-conditioning systems, and of surfaces. The CDC addresses
copper’s use in two of these, water supplies and surfaces, in
its draft guidelines [13].
Material
& Methods
This study was conducted after approval from institutional ethical
committee in the Department of Microbiology, for a period of
one year , from February 2014 to April 2015.
Study Design:
Observational Study
Setting: Eras
Lucknow medical university, Microbiology department
Specimens and instrument
required
• Pure growth of E.coli and Klebsiella
species(sp.), Candida sp.
• Copper discs of approx 90 mm
(petri dish size).
• Copper pieces of size 2*1 cm.
• Blood agar plate, MacConkey agar plate,
Sabourauds Dextrose agar media.
Methods
Part I
(media preparation)
• Eight sterile petri dishes (four for Blood agar
media and four for MacConkey agar media) and two sterile 30 ml screw
capped bottles (for Sabouraud’s Dextrose agar media) were
taken.
• Put sterile copper discs in four petri dishes.
• The melted sterile Blood agar media were poured in
two petri dishes ie: one with copper discs and one without copper
discs. MacConkey agar media was also poured in same pattern.
• Dishes were left undisturbed until the medium was
set.
• In the same way sabourauds Dextrose agar media was
poured in two bottles (one with copper piece and one without).
• Bottles were kept in tilted position so that slant
was formed and left undisturbed until the medium was set.
Part II (culture)
• Two to three colonies from Pure growths
of E.coli and Klebsiella were taken and emulsified in peptone water.
This inoculum was kept for 30 minutes.
• After 30 minutes, the inoculum was
inoculated on two sets of plates as prepared above.
• All the inoculated plates were incubated
at 370C for 24 hours.
• Pure growth of Candida species was
inoculated on two Sabourauds Dextrose agar media in bottles (one with
copper piece and one without copper) and kept at 270C for one week.
Observation
/ Result
The study was conducted in the Microbiology department of
Era’s Lucknow Medical college and Hospitals during Feb 2014
to April 2015. Pure growth of E.coli, Klebsiella, Candida were cultured
and screened for growth on Blood agar, MacConkey agar and Sabourauds
Dextrose agar media with and without copper.
1. Growth of
E.coli [figure 1, figure 2]
Media
|
Without
copper discs
|
With copper discs
|
Blood
agar
|
Heavy
growth
|
Less
growth
|
MacConkey
agar
|
Heavy
growth
|
No growth
|
Table 1 showing growth of E. coli on Blood agar and MacConkey agar with
and without copper discs were compared. Growth was significantly
reduced on Blood agar plates having copper discs and was almost nil on
MacConkey agar plates with copper.
Figures showing inhibitory effects of copper on bacterial and fungal
growth
Figure-1: reduced
growth of E coli on Blood agar with copper disc
Figure-2:
reduced growth of E coli on MacConkey agar with copper disc
2. Growth of Klebsiella
[figure 3]
Media
|
Without
copper discs
|
With copper discs
|
Blood
agar
|
Heavy
growth
|
Less
growth
|
MacConkey
agar
|
Heavy
growth
|
Less
growth
|
Table 2 showing the growth of Klebsiella sp on Blood agar and MacConkey
agar with and without copper discs. Growth was significantly reduced on
both Blood agar and MacConkey agar plates with copper.
Figure-3:
Reduced growth of Klebsiella on MacConkey Agar Plate with Copper discs
3. Growth of
Candida [figure 4]
Media
|
Without copper piece
|
With copper piece
|
Sabourauds Dextrose
Agar
|
Heavy growth
|
Less growth
|
Table 3 showing that the growth of candida sp on Sabourauds Dextrose
agar with copper piece was significantly reduced.
Figure-4:
Reduced growth of Candida species on SDA with copper piece.
Discussion
Copper surfaces, with their self-sanitizing properties, could be
envisioned as making an important contribution to infection control.
Thus, the use of antimicrobial metallic copper surfaces is likely to
provide protection from infectious microbes by reducing surface
contamination, as recently shown in successful hospital
trials. Hospital trials are now ongoing worldwide [14,15]. Data in the
study by Christopher showed that dry metallic copper surfaces rapidly
and efficiently kill bacteria [16].
The bacteriostatic effect of copper was also noted by Dr. Phyllis J.
Kuhn, who was involved in the training of housekeeping and maintenance
personnel in the Hamot Medical Center, Pennsylvania. She
investigated bacterial growth on metals. Small strips of stainless
steel, brass, aluminum, and copper, were inoculated with broths of
Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas species. The
copper and brass strips showed little or no growth, while the aluminum
and stainless steel strips produced a heavy growth of all microbes
[17]. This study was very much similar to our study in which
less growth of E.coli was present on
plates containing copper.
Recent studies have shown that copper alloy surfaces kill E. coli
O157:H7 [18,19,20]. In one of the study, E. coli O157:H7 was
rapidly and almost completely killed within ninety minutes at room
temperature on an alloy containing 99.9% copper .In our study also, we
observed the killing of E.coli and Klebsiella sp on culture
media having copper. After 24 hrs of incubation the growth of the
bacteria was significantly reduced on the Blood agar and MacConkey agar
plates containing copper discs. Another study conducted with
E.coli but with different way by The Midwest Research Institute, USA
showing the similar results of reduction of the E.coli growth on copper
surfaces. In this study bacteria were introduced into fifty foot coils
of different plumbing tube materials. Water with a suspension of E.
coli pumped through the coils .In different types of plumbing material,
including glass, the level of bacteria remained the same or increased
but in the copper loop only 1% of the E. coli bacteria remained viable
after five hours. Our results also showed the antimicrobial property of
copper but the method was different [21].
In one of the study the antifungal efficacy of copper was compared to
aluminium on the following organisms that can cause human infections:
Aspergillus spp., Fusariumspp., Penicilliumc, Aspergillus niger and
Candida albicans [22]. An increased die-off of fungal growth was found
on copper surfaces. We also did experiments with Candida albicans. The
growth was significantly reduced in sabourauds Dextrose agar media with
copper piece and heavy growth was present on bottle with no copper
piece.
Conclusion
The antimicrobial properties of copper surfaces have now been firmly
established. Hospital trials have shown a reduction in bacterial
counts, indicating that copper surfaces are really additional tool
along with other hygienic measures to decrease the number and severity
of nosocomial infections. Additional studies should be done in
determining the most cost-effective way for the protection of hospitals
so that different sites like doorknobs, bed rails, plumbing lines,
working surfaces should be made of copper. This simple experiment in
the laboratory proved the bactericidal and fungicidal properties of
copper. So the copper and its alloys can be implicated in various areas
in the hospital as one of the hygienic measures thus helping in
prevention of nosocomial infection.
Acknowledgement- We
thank the staff for their assistance to carry out this study.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Airey P , Verran J. Potential use of copper as a hygienic surface.
problems associated with cumulative soiling and cleaning. J. Hosp.
Infect. 2007;67(3):272-278. Doi10.1016/j.jhin.2007.09.002\
2. Block SS. Disinfection, Sterilisation and Preservation. 2001;
9:1857. [PubMed]
3. Dollwet HHA, Sorenson JRJ. Historic uses of copper compounds in
medicine.Trace Elements in Medicine.1985; 2.2:80–87.
4. Weber DJ, Rutala WA. Use of metals as microbicides in preventing
infections in healthcare. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &
Wilkins .2001:415-30. [PubMed]
5. Sudha VB, Singh KO, Prasad SR, Venkatasubramanian P. Killing of
enteric bacteria in drinking water by a copper device for use in the
home: laboratory evidence. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009
Aug;103(8):819-22. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2009.01.019. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
[PubMed]
6. Dick RJ, Wray JA, Johnston HN. A Literature and Technology Search on
the Bacteriostatic and Sanitizing Properties of Copper and Copper Alloy
Surfaces. Phase 1 Final Report, INCRA Project 212 ,June 29, 1973;
contracted to Battelle Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
7. Thurman RB, Gerba CP.The Molecular Mechanisms of Copper and Silver
Ion Disinfection of Bacteria and Viruses.CRC Critical Reviews in
Environmental Control.1989;18(4):295–315.
Doi:10.1080/10643388909388351. [PubMed]
8. Sterritt RM, Lester JN. Interactions of heavy metals with bacteria.
Sci Total Environ. 1980 Jan;14(1):5-17. [PubMed]
9. Samuni A, Aronovitch J, Godinger D, Chevion M, Czapski G. On the
cytotoxicity of vitamin C and metal ions. A site-specific Fenton
mechanism. Eur J Biochem. 1983 Dec 1;137(1-2):119-24. [PubMed]
10. Samuni A, Chevion M, Czapski G. Roles of Copper and Superoxide
Anion Radicals in the Radiation-Induced Inactivation of T7
Bacteriophage. Radiat. Res. JSTOR 1984; 99(3):562-572.
[PubMed]
11. Manzl C, Enrich J, Ebner H, Dallinger R, Krumschnabel G.
Copper-induced formation of reactive oxygen species causes cell death
and disruption of calcium homeostasis in trout hepatocytes. Journal of
Toxicology.2004; 196.(1–2): 57–64.
Doi:10.1016/j.tox.2003.11.001. [PubMed]
12. Gregor G, Christopher R, Marc S. Metallic Copper as an
Antimicrobial SurfaceAppl. Environ. Microbiol. March 2011 vol. 77 (
5):1541-1547. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02766-10. [PubMed]
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Dept. of Health and
Human Services.www.cdc.gov.
14. Casey AL, Adams D, Karpanen TJ, Lambert PA, Cookson BD, Nightingale
P, Miruszenko L, Shillam R, Christian P, Elliott TS. Role of copper in
reducing hospital environment contamination. J Hosp Infect. 2010
Jan;74(1):72-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.018. Epub 2009 Nov 20. [PubMed]
15. Marais F, Mehtar S, Chalkley L. Antimicrobial efficacy of copper
touch surfaces in reducing environmental bioburden in a South African
community healthcare facility. J Hosp Infect. 2010 Jan;74(1):80-2. doi:
10.1016/j.jhin.2009.07.010. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
16. Christophe E S, Christian G E, Davide Q, Dylan W D, Christopher J
C, and Gregor G. Bacterial Killing by Dry Metallic Copper Surfaces.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011; 77(3):
794-802.doi.10.1128/AEM.01599-10. [PubMed]
17. Kuhn PJ. Doorknobs: a source of nosocomial infection. Diagnost Med
1983:62e63.
18. Michels HT, Wilks SA, Noyce JO, Keevil C.W. Copper Alloys for Human
Infectious Disease Control. Presented at Materials Science and
Technology Conference, September 2005; 25–28, Pittsburgh, PA.
Copper for the 21st Century Symposium.
19. Wilks SA, Michels H, Keevil CW. The survival of Escherichia coli
O157 on a range of metal surfaces. International Journal of Food
Microbiology .2005;105(3):445–54.
Doi.10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.04.021. [PubMed]
20. Espírito Santo C, Taudte N, Nies DH, Grass G.
Contribution of copper ion resistance to survival of Escherichia coli
on metallic copper surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008
Feb;74(4):977-86. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
21. Wells, F., Midwest Res Inst 2001, 348(348C/348D), 48. [PubMed]
22. Weaver L, Michels HT, Keevil CW. Potential for preventing spread of
fungi in air-conditioning systems constructed using copper instead of
aluminium.Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010 Jan;50(1):18-23. doi:
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02753.x.
How to cite this article?
Khan M.A, Yaqoob S. Inhibitory effects of copper on bacterial and
fungal growth. Int J Med Res Rev 2017;5(05):466-471.
doi:10.17511/ijmrr. 2017.i05.05.