Cerebral astroblastoma-a rare and
elusive case
Panda S 1, Pattanaik R 2,
Bhagat S 3, Nisa S 4, Panda B.B 5, Dash B6
1Dr. Subhasish Panda, Resident, 2Dr. Rajesh Pattanaik, Resident, 3Dr.
Savitri Bhagat, Professor, 4Dr. S. Nisa, Associate Professor, 5Dr.
Braja Behari Panda, Associate Professor, 6Dr. Bararuchi Dash, Associate
Professor. All affiliated to P.G. Department of Radiodiagnosis, V.S.S.
Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Burla, Sambalpur, Odisha,
India
Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Subhasish Panda, Email:
drsubhasishpanda@gmail.com
Abstract
Background:
Astroblastoma is rare neuroglial intracranial tumor most commonly
occurring in the first three decades of life. Case report: A 5
year old female child presented with intermittent headache, diplopia
and recurrent seizures over a period of approximately 4 months. Her
neurological examination revealed 6th nerve palsy and papilledema. Both
CT and MRI revealed a well defined enhancing solid-cystic mass in the
left fronto-parietal cerebral cortex with mass effect suggestive of
primitive neuroectodermal tumor. She underwent gross total resection of
the lesion through craniotomy. Histopathology along with
immunohistochemistry was surprisingly suggestive of astroblastoma. Conclusion:
Astroblastomas are very rare and often misdiagnosed.
Key words:
Computerized tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Supratentorial
Manuscript received:
25th October 2016,
Reviewed: 6th November 2016
Author Corrected: 18th
November 2016, Accepted
for Publication: 30th November 2016
Introduction
Astroblastomas are well circumscribed intracranial tumors of neuroglial
origin with a very rare incidence with approximately 230 cases reported
globally till date [1,2]. They are most commonly found in the first
three decades of life. Literature reports that astroblastoms comprise
0.5 to 2.8% of primary gliomas. They mimic astrocytoma, ependymoma,
primitive neuroectodermal tumor & dysembryoplastic
neuroepithelial tumor radiologically and hence are frequently
underdiagnosed [2]. They almost always located
supratentorially in the brain parenchyma, with few
exceptions. They are situated peripheral in the cerebral cortex,
comprising of both solid and cystic components [3]. Early diagnosis
followed by gross total resection of the tumor with subsequent
radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy for the high grade lesions is
advocated.
Case
Report
A 5 year old female child presented to the Department of Medicine of
our Institution with intermittent headache, diplopia and recurrent
seizures over a period of approximately 4 months. Her neurological
examination revealed 6th nerve palsy and papilledema.
She was referred to the Department of Radiodiagnosis where she was
subjected to computerized tomography (CT) scan of the brain which
revealed a mixed solid-cystic mass lesion of size 90 x85x75 mm over
left frontal and parietal lobe. The solid component was located
peripherally in a superolateral location. The cystic component showed
multiple internal septation (Fig 1). IV Contrast CT Scan image depicted
heterogenous enhancement. The differential diagnoses given based on CT
imaging were primitive neuro-ectodermal tumor (PNET) and
dysembryoplastic infantile ganglioglioma (DIG).
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was subsequently performed where the
cystic component of the space occupying lesion demonstrated high signal
on T2W sequence. The solid component had hypo-to-isointense signal on
T1W and mixed iso and hyperintensity on T2W sequence. On IV contrast
administration, solid component as well as the wall and septations of
the cystic component were noted to take enhancement. Mass effect with
subfalcine herniation and midline shift of around 15 mm was noted to
the right, with dilatation of contralateral ventricle (Fig 2). Post MRI
diagnosis was PNET.
The patient underwent gross total resection of the lesion through left
parietal craniotomy (Fig 3) and biopsy specimen was obtained (Fig
4). Histopathological analysis revealed a moderately cellular
and vascular tumour composed of round, oval to elongated irregular
cells with round to oval vesicular nuclei and pale, eosinophilic
cytoplasm arranged around hyalinised vessel walls suggestive of
Astroblastoma (Fig 5). Immunohistochemistry revealed position reaction
to GFAP (Fig 6), S-100, Vimentin and negativity to EMA. INI was
positive in a moderate number of tumor cells.
The immediate postoperative period was uneventful
Fig-1: CT
Scan - Plain and Post Contrast Images showing the intracranial tumor
with solid and cystic components and its enhancement pattern, mass
effect and subfalcine herniation
Fig-2: MRI
- Plain Axial and Coronal Post Gadolinium Contrast T1 W Images showing
enhancement of solid component and mural enhancement of the cystic
component of the tumor.
Fig 3(a): Gross Total Resection of Tumor Fig 3(b): The Biopsy
Fig 4(a): Histopathological picture 4(b): Immunohistochemistry
positive for
GFAP
Discussion
Astroblastomas are rare neuroglial tumors with approximately 230 cases
reported in literature ever since they were first described by Bailey
and Cushing and later characterized by Bailey and Bucy [1].
Astroblastomas are well circumscribed intracranial tumors of glial
origin [2]. They most commonly affect children and young adults [4].
Although there is no significant gender preponderance, incidence is
more common in females [2,5]. Presentation is usually that of
increased intracranial pressure. Symptoms of headache, seizures and
focal neurological deficits are most common. The presence of a large
hemispheric circumscribed solid and cystic mass in a supratentorial
location is highly suggestive of its diagnosis [2]. However, some rare
locations namely in the cerebellum, brainstem, corpus callosum,
hypothalamus, and the ventricular system have also been reported [6].
Our case exhibited all the above features.
Imaging features on computerised tomography of astroblastoma reveal a
lobulated mass with solid and cystic components taking heterogenous
enhancement on IV contrast administration. The solid component appears
isodense to mildly hyperdense on plain study. The patient’s
lesion was within the ambit of these findings.
On Magnetic Resonance Imaging, the solid component of the mass usually
appears isointense on T1W image and hypointense on T2W with respect to
the gray matter. Post contrast T1W images typically reveal rim
enhancement of the cystic component and heterogenous enhancement of the
solid component. Significant perilesional edema proportionate to the
size of the tumor is usually absent [2]. However, in our case
homogenous enhancement of the solid component of the neoplasm was seen.
Although the name astroblastoma suggests astrocytic origin,
histologically it resembles ependymoma more than astrocytoma.
Astroblastomas are defined histologically by the presence of
perivascular pseudorosettes and prominent perivascular hyalinization
[6]. Radiation of astrocytic cell processes towards a central
hyalinisation is its characteristic [2]. In our patient the arrangement
of tumor cells around blood vessels was akin to that of pseudorosettes.
There was moderate vascular endothelial proiliferation and mitotic
activity, hence pathological diagnosis of astroblastoma (WHO Grade IV)
was made. Astroblastomas are generally immunopositive for GFAP, S-100,
vimentin and negative for EMA according to Pizer BL et al which was
just the case in our patient [7]. These tumors are easily misdiagnosed
as they mimic ependymoma, primitive neuroectodermal tumor &
atypical rhabdoid-teratoid tumor radiologically [2,6].
The treatment advocated for astroblastomas include radical surgical
resection and in cases where complete excision is not possible,
chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy is advocated [8]. In our case the
presence of increased vascularity and moderate cellularity suggested
probable high-grade of the tumor and surgical resection was performed.
Conclusion
Without doubt, astroblastoma is one of the most challenging entities to
diagnose among all CNS neoplasms. As a differential diagnosis, this
tumor should be kept in mind in a young patient with a circumscribed
solid and cystic intracranial mass. Demographic background, imaging
features and histopathological follow up are essential in
diagnosing this rare tumor.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Brat DJ, Hirose Y, Cohen KJ, Feuerstein BG, Burger PC.
Astroblastoma: clinicopathologic features and chromosomal abnormalities
defined by comparative genomic hybridization. Brain Pathol. 2000
Jul;10(3):342-52.
2. Karsy M, Guan J, Jensen R, Huang LE, Colman H. The Impact of Hypoxia
and Mesenchymal Transition on Glioblastoma Pathogenesis and Cancer Stem
Cells Regulation. World Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;88:222-36. doi:
10.1016/j.wneu.2015.12.032. Epub 2015 Dec 25.
3. Bell JW, Osborn AG, Salzman KL, Blaser SI, Jones BV, Chin SS.
Neuroradiologic characteristics of astroblastoma. Neuroradiology. 2007
Mar;49(3):203-9. Epub 2007 Jan 10. [PubMed]
4. Barakat MI, Ammar MG, Salama HM, Abuhashem S. Astroblastoma: Case
Report and Review of Literature. Turk Neurosurg. 2016;26(5):790-4. doi:
10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.9408-13.2.
5. Janz C, Buhl R. Astroblastoma: report of two cases with unexpected
clinical behavior and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg.
2014 Oct;125:114-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul
21. [PubMed]
6. Arcipreste AA, Felipe Padilla Vazquez, Ricardo Ramirez Aguilar,
Castruita UO, Rafael Mendizabal Guerra. High-grade astroblastoma in a
child: Report of one case and review of literature. Surg Neurol Int.
24-Jul-2014; 5: 111.
7. Pizer BL, Moss T, Oakhill A, Webb D, Coakham HB. Congenital
astroblastoma: An immunohistochemical study. Case report. J Neurosurg.
1995; 83:550–5. [PubMed]
8. Salvati M, DElia A, Brogna C,Antonelli M, Giangaspero F, et al.
Cerebral astroblastoma: analysis of six cases and critical review of
treatment options. J Neurooncol. 2009:93(3):369-378.
How to cite this article?
Panda S, Pattanaik R, Bhagat S, Nisa S, Panda B. B, Dash B. Cerebral
astroblastoma-a rare and elusive case. Int J Med Res Rev
2016;4(11):1985-1988.doi:10.17511/ijmrr. 2016.i11.15.