CRP, an acute phase reactant:
Role in Differentiating Bacterial and Non-Bacterial CNS Infections
Gedam DS1
1Dr. D Sharad Gedam, MD, Editor-in-chief, IJMRR
Address for
correspondence: Dr D Sharad Gedam, E-mail:
editor.ijmrr@gmail.com
Abstract
C reactive Protein is marker of acute inflammation. Now
quantitative measurement of CRP is possible. It’s
quantitative
titers are better indicator of inflammation then qualitative one.
Key Words:
C reactive Protein, acute inflammation, quantitative measurement of CR.
Introduction
C reactive Protein is known acute phase reactant since
1930[1].
Its level increases with any kind of inflammation. Meningitis still
remains very common reason for morbidity and mortality in developing
countries like India. Although cerebrospinal fluid examination and
Culture remains gold standard for diagnosis of meningitis but
facilities are not easily available especially in emergency hours.
There are very few studies available in literature to evaluate role of
C reactive proteins in Cerebrospinal fluid to differentiate Non
bacterial and bacterial CNS Infections [1, 2, 3]. In developing
countries patient usually reach to tertiary care centre after receiving
various antibiotics. In this situation culture report is either
negative or it takes few days before showing any result. Often CSF
examination is not possible or show picture of partially treated
meningitis. We give empirical antibiotics therapy in this
situation. Bejagavi et al [6] in his study acute phase reactant
adenosine
deaminase and CRP in Cerebrospinal fluid. ADA has a sensitivity and
specificity of 73.9% and 92.6% respectively for Tubercular meningitis
while CSF C- reactive Proteins have a sensitivity and specificity of
83.3 % and 100% respectively for Pyogenic meningitis. Other studies[7, 8, 9, 10, 11] have similar results.
Sensitivity
and specificity of CSF C reactive Protein was high for for Pyogenic
meningitis. It also important tool to differentiate Viral and partially
treated meningitis with Pyogenic meningitis. Measurment of other acute
phase reactant with CSF C reactive Protein will further increases
sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tool. Patel et al5. In his study he used CSF C reactive Protein as
a
bedside tool to differentiate between Bacterial and Non bacterial
Meningitis. Results were very encouraging while awaiting result of CSF
examination. Sensitivity and specificity was 83.3 and 87.5%
respectively for Pyogenic meningitis. Similarly Positive predictive
value was 75% and Negative predictive value was 92% for Bacterial
meningitis. In tubercular meningitis sensitivity and specificity was
20% and 60.5% respectively. In viral meningitis CSF C reactive protein
was negative in all cases. Similar results were seen with Mala et al2.
In her study sensitivity and specificity was 96.87 % and 74.73%
respectively. For Tubercular meningitis sensitivity and specificity was
10% and 55.38%.This study5 has some limitations. They have used a
Qualitative CRP
kit which shows either positive or negative results. CSF C reactive
proteins by measuring quantitative methods could have been better. This
study included a small sample size. Thus while measuring CSF CRP as
screening methods we need further study with larger sample size to show
its efficacy. Similarly a larger control group should be taken for
better analysis. Measurement of virological markers in CSF should be
done to diagnose viral meningitis.
Funding: Nil,
Conflict of
interest: None
Permission of
IRB: Yes
References
1. Tillett WS, Francis T Jr. Serological reactions in
pneumonia
with a non-protein somatic fraction of Pneumococcus. J Exper Med 1980;
52:561–71. [PubMed]
2. Malla KK, Malla T, Rao KS, Basnet S, Shah R. Is
Cerebrospinal
fluid C reactive Protein a better tool than blood C reactive Protein in
Laboratory diagnosis of meningitis in
children? Sultan Qaboos University Med J, 2013; 13(1): 93-99. [PubMed]
3. Corral CJ, Pepple JM, Moxon R, Hughes WT.C-reactive
protein in
cerebrospinal fluid in childrenwith meningitis. J Pediatr
1981;99:365–9. [PubMed]
4. Clarke D, Cost K. Use of serum C-reactive protein in
differentiating septic from aseptic meningitis in children. J Pediatr
1983;102:718–20. [PubMed]
5. Patel N, Patel U. Evaluating Utility of
C-Reactive
Protein in Differentiating Bacterial from Non-Bacterial
Meningitis in Tertiary Care Hospital, In Central India Int J Med Res
Rev 2013;1(2).
6. Belagavi AC, Shalini M. Cerebrospinal fluid C reactive
protein
and adenosine deaminase in meningitis in adults. J Assoc Physicians
India. 2011;59:557-60. [PubMed]
7. Shimetani N, Shimetani K, Mori M. Levels of three
inflammation
markers, C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A protein and procalcitonin,
in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with meningitis. Scand
J Clin Lab Invest. 2001;61(7):567-74.
8. Shimetani N, Ichikawa K, Shibuya M, et al. Quantitative
levels
of serum amyloid A protein and other proteins in cerebrospinal fluid
and serum of patients with meningitis. Japanese Rinsho Byori.
1998;46(9):930-5. [PubMed]
9. Gendrel D, Raymond J, Assicot M et al. Procalcitonin,
C-reactive protein and interleukin 6 in bacterial and viral meningitis
in children. French Presse Med 1998;27;27(23):1135-9. [PubMed]
10. Stearman M, Southgate HJ. The use of cytokine and
C-reactive
protein measurements in cerebrospinal fluid during acute infective
meningitis. Ann Clin Biochem 1994 ;31(3):255-61. [PubMed]
11. Ahmad P, Ali SM, Fakhir S, Chandra J. C-reactive protein
in CNS infection. Indian Pediatr 1991;28(10):1167-70. [PubMed]
How to cite
this article ?
Gedam DS. CRP an acute phase reactant: Role in
Differentiating
Bacterial and Non-Bacterial CNS Infections.2013. Int J Med Res Rev
2013;1(2):45-46