Study of variations in posterior communicating artery in human brain

Prasanna M.B 1, Cessy Job 2, Nandagopalan P.A. 3

1Dr. Prasanna M.B., Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, 2Dr. 
Cessy Job, Department of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, 3Dr. Nandagopalan P.A., P.K. Das Institute of Medical Sciences, Ottapalam, Kerala, India

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Cessy Job, Email:  drcessy@gmail.com



Abstract

Introduction: Brain is normally supplied by two internal carotid arteries and two vertebral arteries which unite to form the circle of Willis. The danger of intracranial vascular lesion has increased, so a thorough knowledge of arterial circulation of brain is essential. There are variations in the length, diameter and branches of vessels forming the circle of Willis. Posterior communicating arteries are important arteries connecting the carotid and vertebral systems. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four brain specimens were studied. The major blood vessels forming the circle of willis were traced by dissection. Their length, origin, branching pattern and anastomosis were studied, painted and photographed. Results: It was observed that the variations in arteries forming circle of Willis was 54%. Maximum variations were observed in the communicating arteries (29%), of these the variations were more (15%) in the posterior communicating arteries. Conclusion: A gross anatomical study of arteries forming the circle of willis was conducted. The origin course and branching pattern of major arteries forming the circle was studied and tabulated. Maximum numbers of variations were observed in the posterior communicating artery.



Manuscript received: 22nd Feb 2016, Reviewed: 2nd March 2016
Author Corrected: 10th March 2016, Accepted for Publication: 26th March 2016

Introduction

The danger of intracranial vascular lesion has increased, so a thorough knowledge of arterial circulation of brain is essential. We human beings are thought to be alike in general anatomical construction yet there are variations in the length, diameter and branches of vessels forming the circle of Willis. Posterior communicating arteries are important arteries connecting the carotid and vertebral systems. They play an important role in equalizing the pressure of blood on both sides of the circle thus preventing cerebrovascular accidents. According to study of Fields et al [1] there was duplication of right posterior communicating artery. Crowell and Morawetz [2] stated that the posterior communicating artery took origin from internal carotid artery. Anubha Saha  et al [11] in their study with 60 Brain specimens, found  that in 38.2% cases posterior communicating artery was absent and in 23.3% cases hypoplastic. We used 104 human brain specimens to study the variations in the circle of Willis. These specimens were studied in the dissection hall of medical colleges. The vessels were traced painted and photographed. Their length and variations were noted. Variations observed in the circle were 54%. It was maximum for the posterior communicating artery (15%).

Materials and Methods

The brain specimens were obtained from the cadavers in the dissection hall of Govt. Medical College Kottayam and P.K. Das Institute of Medical Sciences Palakkad. Only brain specimens with intact Circle of Willis were taken for this study. Brain specimens with incomplete and torn circle of Willis were not included in the study. The study was conducted in 104 brain specimens with intact circle of Willis.

The major blood vessels forming the circle of Willis were traced by dissection. Their length, origin, branching pattern and anastomosis were studied, painted and photographed.

Observations

Maximum numbers of variations were observed in the communicating arteries ie 29%, of which more variations were seen in the posterior communicating artery (15%) than in the anterior communicating artery which was 14%.

The posterior communicating artery measured a greatest length of 1.8cms and a smallest of 0.5cms. The right posterior communicating artery was found to be absent in one case and the left in one case. It was thin and short in two cases on the right side and in one case on the left side.

It was enlarged and thickened on the right side in one case and on the left side in three cases. ( fig 1) it was thin and elongated on both sides in two cases (fig 2)

It was observed to be single on both sides in all specimens except in one case where it was double on the right side. (fig 3)

The posterior cerebral artery was observed to be thin and short in ten cases where the posterior communicating artery and the distal segment of posterior cerebral artery were of the same thickness. It appeared as if the posterior cerebral artery took origin from internal carotid artery directly known as proximal cerebral artery with a primitive posterior communicating artery (fig 4).

 figure01
Fig 1: A  thick posterior communicating  artery on the right side (  P.C.C)
    
figure02
Fig 2: Posterior communicating artery (P.C.C) thin and elongated bilaterally
 
figure03
    
Fig 3: Double posterior communicating  artery (P.C.C)on the right side 
  
figure04
Fig 4: The posterior cerebral artery (PCA) thin and posterior communicating artery (PCC) arising from the internal carotid artery (ICA)

Variations Observed

Artery

Variations observed in

No. of cases

Anterior cerebral

 

8

Middle cerebral

Nil

Nil

Posterior Cerebral

 

13

Anterior Communicating

 

15

Posterior Communicating

Absence

Thin and short

Duplication

Enlarged and thickened

Thin and long

Abnormal origin from middle cerebral artery

2

3

1

4

4

2

Total = 16


Discussion

Duplication of right posterior communicating artery was seen in one case which is in accordance with the study of Fields et al [1]. In 10 cases the initial segment of posterior cerebral artery was hypoplastic. It was absent in 3 cases.

Crowell and Morawetz stated that the posterior communicating artery took origin from internal carotid artery and is frequently larger on one side which was seen in this study. Except in two cases it took origin from middle cerebral artery [2].

Lewis described the long arteries or medullary arteries from the anterior and posterior cerebral arteries pass in to a depth of three or four centimeters without inter communicating [3]. In 7 cases, it was noted that the posterior cerebral artery appeared to arise from internal carotid artery rather than basilar artery, which is in accordance with Padget [4]. Abbie described that the posterior choroidal artery vary in number and arrangement [5].

Abbie has also described the posterior cerebral artery, a branch of basilar artery but morphologically a continuation of internal carotid artery, which is in accordance with this study [6].

The Circle of Willis and its variations have been extensively studied and was found to have about 60% variations Fawcett and Blachford which was only 54% in this study [7].

Kaplan postulated that medial striate artery (Recurrent artery of Heubner’s) is said to anastomose with the lenticulostriate arteries and the surface branches of anterior and middle cerebral arteries [8]. Mc Cullough reported two cases in which the left cerebral artery ended intracranically without joining the basilar [9].

Lang and Hann have conducted arteriograms and radioisotope flow studies on 58 patients and gave an excellent demonstration of the collateral pathways [10].

Anubha Saha, Bovindala Bhagyalakshmi et al in their study with 60 Brain specimens, found  38.3% having normal posterior communicating artery. In 38.2% cases it was found to be absent and in 23.3% cases hypoplastic. In the present study variations in posterior communicating artery was found to be only 15% [11].

Application: These days there are an increasing number of cerebrovascular accidents and a grave morbidity associated with it. The awareness of these variations is of importance to the neurosurgeons.

Acknowledgement: Authors sincerely thank Dr. Raju Jacob Professor and Head, Dept of Anatomy, Govt. Medical College, Kottayam for his constant support. Authors also acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors/editors/ publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed.

Funding: Nil, Conflict of interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB: Yes

References


1. Fields W.S., Bruetman, M.E., Weibel, J. 1965, Collateral circulation of the brain. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore. [PubMed]

2. Crowell RM, Morawetz RB. The anterior communicating artery has significant branches. Stroke. 1977 Mar-Apr;8(2):272-3.
[PubMed]

3. LEWIS OJ. The form and development of the blood vessels of the mammalian cerebral cortex. J Anat. 1957 Jan;91(1):40-6.
[PubMed]

4. Padget 1948, The development of the cranial arteries in the human embryo. Contr. Embryol, 32, 205-61.
[PubMed]

5. Abbie AA. The Blood Supply of the Lateral Geniculate Body, with a Note on the Morphology of the Choroidal Arteries. J Anat. 1933 Jul;67(Pt 4):491-521.
[PubMed]

6. Abbie, 1934, The morphology of forebrain arteries with a special reference to the evolution of basal ganglia. J. Anat. 68, 433-70.
[PubMed]

7. Fawcett, Blac ford, 1906, The circle of willis and examination of 700 specimens, J. Anat. 40, 63-9.


8. Kaplan H.A., Ford D.H., 1966, Brain vascular system, Elsevier publishing Co., Amsterdam pp. 230.


9. Mc. Cullough, A.W., 1962, Some anomalies of the cerebral arterial circle (of willis) and related vessels. Anat. Rec. 142:537.


10. Lang E.K., Hann E.C. 1965 , Angiographic and isotope pool circulation study of the cerebral hemisphere after internal carotid artery occlusion .Qty. in Gerentology & Geriatrics 1966 pg. 510.


11. Anubha Saha, Bovindala Bhagyalakshmi et al (2013)- Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences January – June 2013, Vol.11, No.1.




How to cite this article?

Prasanna M.B, Cessy Job, Nandagopalan P.A, Study of variations in posterior communicating artery in human brain : Int J Med Res Rev 2016;4(4):476-479. doi: 10.17511/ijmrr.2016.i04.02.