A retained Pessary in a 65 year old woman: Case Report

Patil P1, Patil A2

1Dr Pooja Patil, Assistant Professor in Obstetrics & Gynaecology, L N Medical College, Bhopal, India. 2Dr Abhijit Patil, Assistant Professor in Radiodiagnosis, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, India

Address for correspondence: Dr Pooja Patil, Email: pooja_gynec@yahoo.co.in



Abstract

Introduction: Vaginal pessaries are being used as a treatment of uterovaginal prolapse since a long time but forgotten pessaries may cause many complications. They are being used in cases of uterovaginal prolapse if patients are not fit for surgery or refuses for surgery. Case report: Our patient was a 65 year old woman who had pessary insertion 30 years back but luckily she didn’t have any serious complication. Instead her presentation was very unusual. Her pessary was covered on lateral sides by the vaginal epithelium like a loop, which was cut by cautery and the pessary was removed and patient finally underwent vaginal hysterectomy for third degree prolapse. Discussion: Vaginal pessary is a very simple and easy mode of treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and patients are satisfied of their symptoms by it but it can lead to severe complications if not changed in time or forgotten for long time. Before insertion of pessary, patient should be educated about its cleanliness and frequency of changing and should always be called for routine check- up.

KeyWords: Vaginal pessaries, Pessaries, Pelvic Organ Prolapse.



Manuscript received: 13th Aug 2013, Reviewed: 16th Sept 2013
Author Corrected: 19th Sep 2013, Accepted for Publication: 8th Nov 2013

Introduction

Pessaries are the standard nonsurgical treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse [1] .Throughout history various vaginal devices and materials for prolapse have been described including cloth, wood, wax, metal, ivory, bone, sponge and cork [1]. Now pessaries are usually made of silicone or inert plastic and they are safe and simple to manage [1]. Pessary is indicated in a woman who is unfit for sugery or is a high risk for surgery on account of some medical disorders [2]. It is indicated in a young woman planning a pregnancy, during early pregnancy, puerperium and temporary use while clearing infection and decubitus ulcer [2]. A pessary does not cure prolapse, it merely holds up the tissues [3]. Survey demonstrates that 87% to 98% of gynaecologists and/or urogynecologists prescribe pessaries in their practice [4]. Of all the pessaries the two most commonly used and studied devices are the ring and Gellhorn pessaries [1]. A patient must be an active particiant in the treatment decision to use a pessary. Its success will depend upon her ability to care for the pessary either alone or with the assistance of a caretaker and her willingness and availability to come for subsequent evaluations [1].Serious complications such as erosions into adjacent organs are rare with proper use and usually result only after years of neglect [1].

Case report

A 65 year old woman came to our OPD with history of something inserted for uterine prolapse 30 years ago and willing for the definitive treatment now. She didn’t had any complaint of foul smelling discharge or blood stained discharge or any difficulty in urination and defecation. She was Para [7] and all deliveries were conducted at home by dais. Her last childbirth was 35 years back. She didn’t have any medical disorder. There was history of tubectomy around 35 years back. On examination patient was fairly built and there was no pallor. On per speculum examination a white colour pessary was seen which on both lateral sides was covered by vaginal epithelium. On examining further a loop like structure was formed by the vaginal epithelium over the lateral ends of pessary. After due fitness, patient was taken under short general anaesthesia for removal of the pessary. The vaginal outgrowths were cut by cautery on either side and the pessary was easily removed. There was raw area left but no active bleeding. Patient was sent home with antibiotics for 5 days and called after 15 days for vaginal hysterectomy. On examination there was very small raw area left and the rest healed. Patient underwent Vaginal hysterectomy with Pelvic floor repair and was discharged on postoperative day [7].

FIGURE01

Fig 1: Pessary is visible during examination 
 

  figure02                   

Fig 2: Cauterization to remove epithelial lining

figure03

Fig 3: After cutting vaginal band pessary was removed

Discussion

Vaginal pessaries are devices of varying composition (rubber, clear plastic, silicone, or soft plastic with internal mouldable steel reinforcement) that serve to reposition and support prolapse genitourinary organs [5]. Now-a-days ring pessary made of inert plastic or silicone is the most commonly used pessary. Two broad categories of pessary exist: support and space-filling pessaries. The supportive pessaries were defined as those derived by a spring mechanism(ring, Gehrung, lever-type pessaries) that rests in the posterior fornix and against the posterior aspect of the symphysis pubis. Space filling pessaries were defined as supported by the creation of suction between the pessary and the vaginal walls (eg. Cube) or by providing a diameter larger than the genital hiatus (Donut, Inflatoball, Shaatz) or by both mechanism (Gellhorn) [4]

Although surgery is the definitive treatment for severe uterine prolapse, pessaries can give satisfactory results in women who wish or need to avoid surgery [6]. Various complications have been reported due to forgotten pessaries. Most commonly a discharge and odor develop with continued wearing of a vaginal pessary [4]. In a study by Ainaif and Drutz [7] bacterial vaginosis was found four times more commonly in pessary users. Mucosal abrasions and erosions of the vagina and/or cervix are more common with cube and Gellhorn pessaries [4]. They are also more likely in patients who do not remove and reinsert their own pessary, as well as women with untreated vaginal atrophy. Many serious complications like vesicovaginal fistula [ 8], rectovaginal fistula [9], Intestinal obstruction [10], small bowel prolapse and incarceration [11], hydronephrosis and urosepsis [12,13] and vaginal cancer [14] have been reported but are rare and have been noticed in cases of neglected or forgotten pessaries.

Funding:
Nil, Conflict of interest: Nil

Permission from IRB: Yes

References


1. Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, Hoffman BL, Bradshaw KD, Cunningham FG. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Williams Gynecology 2008:545-547.

2. Padubidri VG, Daftary SN: Genital Prolapse Howkin’s & Bourne Shaw’s Textbook of Gynecology,14th edition:304.

3. Kumar P., Malhotra N.:Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Jeffcoate’s Principles of Gynaecology,7th international edition 2008:286.

4. John AR,Howard WJ.The Nonsurgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse:The use of vaginal pessaries.Telinde’s Operative Gynecology,10th edition:936-941.

5. Roberge J, Keller C, Garfinkel M. Vaginal pessary-induced mechanical bowel obstruction. J Emerg Med 2001;20: 367-70. [PubMed]

6. Zeitlin MP, Lebher TB. Pessaries in the geriatric patient. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40: 635-9. [PubMed]

7.Alnaif B.Drutz HP.Bacterial vaginosis increases in pessary users.Int Urogynecol J 2000;11:219. [PubMed]

8. Arias BE, Ridgeway B, Barber MD. Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1173-8. [PubMed]

9. Powers K, Grigorescu B, Lazarou G, Greston WM, Weber T. Neglected pessary causing a rectovaginal fistula: a case report J Reprod Med. 2008 Mar;53(3):235-7. [PubMed]

10. Lukowski L. Rare case of mechanical obstruction, occlusion of the intestine due to pessary. Pol Tyg Lek 1971; 26: 1202–3. [PubMed]

11. Ott R, Richter H, Behr J, Scheele J. Small bowel prolapse and incarceration caused by a vaginal ring pessary. Br J Surg 1993; 80: 1157. [PubMed]

12. Meinhardt W, Schnitemaker NEW, Smeets MJ, Verema PL. Bilateral hydronephrosis and urosepsis due to neglected pessary. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993; 27: 419–20. [PubMed]

13. Roberge RJ, McCandlish MM, Dorfsman ML. Urosepsis associated with vaginal pessary use. Ann Emerg Med 1999; 33: 581–3. [PubMed]

14. Jain A, Majoko F, Freites O How innocent is the vaginal pessary? Two cases of vaginal cancer associated with pessary use J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Nov;26(8):829-30. [PubMed]



How to cite this article?

Patil P1, Patil A2. A retained Pessary in a 65 year old woman: Case Report. Int J Med Res Rev 2013;1(5):264-266.doi:10.17511/ijmrr.2013.i05.010. 
doi:10.17511/ijmrr.2013.i05.010.