Tinidazole-Induced Fixed Drug
Eruption: A Case Report
Sarkar M K1, Mishra R2,
Pandya P3, Bansal A4, Bajhaiya B S5, Mithun6
1Dr Manuj Kumar Sarkar, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Index Medical
College Hospital and Research Centre, Indore, MP, India, 2Dr Rishu
Mishra, 3Dr Parth Pandya, 4Dr Aastha Bansal, 5Dr Babeena Singh
Bajhaiya, and 6Dr Mithun, (2-6)Post Graduate Student, Department of
Medicine, Index Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Indore,
MP, India. All are affiliated to Index Medical College Hospital and
Research Centre, Indore, MP, India.
Address for
Correspondence: Dr Manuj Kumar Sarkar, Email:
manojsarkar654321@gmail.com
Abstract
FDE is characterized by onset of oval or round erythematous macule on
the mucosa or skin. Patients may have itching and burning sensation. 22
years old married female presented with complaining of burning
sensation and ulceration in lower lip and erythematous well-defined
macule on muco-cutaneous junction of vagina for last two days following
intake of Tinidazole 400 mg twice daily for 1 day. FDE though not
fatal, can cause cosmetic disfigurement. Fixed drug eruption in genital
region is a matter of apprehension. The exact mechanism of FDE is
unknown.
Keywords:
Fixed Drug Eruption, Tinidazole, Nitroimidazoles
Manuscript received: 4th
July 2015, Reviewed:
11th July 2015
Author Corrected: 18th
July 2015, Accepted for
Publication: 31st July 2015
Introduction
Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is characterized by single or multiple skin
lesions which occur at the same site each time the drug is administered
[1, 2]. Lesions are usually oval or round and well defined, but their
severity increases with each exposure. Skin reactions are found 1 to 10
hours of ingestion of drugs. Redness and swelling appears first. They
are commonly seen in perianal area, but may be found in any part of
body. After healing, hyperpigmentation persist at the site [2].
Structurally similar same group drugs shows cross-sensitivity. The drug
acts as hapten and binds to basal keratinocytes, thus initiates
hypersensitivity reaction [3, 4].
Nitroimidazoles are antimicrobial compounds having very good activity
against anaerobic-organisms and protozoa. Tey are used commonly in
amoebiasis, both hepatic and intestinal form. Their side chains are
different [2, 4]. Nitroimidazoles are used as self medication and a
number of cases of fixed drug eruption caused by nitroimidazoles are
reported as metronidazole [5,6,7, 8 and 9], tinidazole[4,10,11,12], and
ornidazole [2,13,14,15,16] etc.
Case
Report
22 years old married female presented to the OPD (Outpatient
Department) of general medicine in Index Medical College Hospital and
research centre, Indore, MP, India, complaining of burning sensation
and ulceration in lower lip and erythematous well-defined macule on
muco-cutaneous junction of vagina for 2 days. From history it was found
that the patient was suffering from acute gastro-enteritis for the last
3 days and she was taking tablet Tinidazole 400 mg/day twice daily for
1 day. She was not taking any other medications. She was non-diabetic.
No history of any substance abuse or other drugs. No history of any
sexual contact. She had lesions in lips and vaginal mucosa following
ingestion of Tinidazole 6 months back.
O/E, vital signs were normal. Ulceration on the lower lip with
peripheral erythematous halo [figure: 1] was found and macule in
vaginal mucosa was seen. The lesions were non tender. There was no
itching or no pus discharge was present. There was no evidence of any
skin involvement. Routine investigations were within normal limit.
Based on history and examination, a provisional diagnosis of Fixed Drug
Eruption (FDE) due to Tinidazole was made considering the relation of
the drug consumption with appearance of the lesions. She was treated
with tablet dexamethasone, levocetrizine, topical cream was given
containing fusidic acid and betamethasone, tablet Rabiprazole 20 mg on
empty stomach.
Figure 1:
Ulcerated lesion on lower lip with peripheral erythematous halo
Follow up on 10 day, all the lesions subsided and only
hyperpigmentation was persisting [figure: 2]. The assessment showed
probable (Score - 7) and moderate (level - 4) type of ADR as per
Naranjo algorithm [18] and Hartwig scale [19] respectively.
Figure 2:
Hyperpigmentation of lower lip on follow up
Discussion
FDE is a type of delayed hypersensitivity mediated by CD8 cells. The
drug acts as hapten and binds to basal keratinocytes, thus initiates
hypersensitivity reaction and lymphocytes releases antibodies which
damages basal cell [2, 13, and 14]. Oral administration causes most
FDE’s rather than other means. Structurally similar drug from
the same group can cause fixed drug eruption, which is called cross
sensitivity.
A single erythematous macule is the commonest presentation, it may
become pigmented. Typically they reappear at the same site, but on
stoppage of the drug, they disappear, only residual hyperpigmentation
can be found later. New lesions can develop on previously normal skin
also [14].
21-30 years is the peak incidence of FDE and male:female are equally
affected [4]. Most commonly involved sites are lips, palm and soles,
genital areas. Commonly involved sites as stated by Sharma VK are trunk
and limbs (24%), lips alone (20.8%) and genitalia alone (20%),
generalised (14.4%), lips and genitalia together (11.2%), and trunk
alone (8.8%)[14,17].
The diagnosis of FDE is usually done based on characteristic
hyperpigmentation following drug intake and persisting
hyperpigmentation after improvement. History of drug intake and a past
history of similar lesions at the same sites following intake of the
same drug are important aspect of diagnosis of FDE [14].
Challenge test as oral and topical are used for confirmation of FDE. If
there is no reaction with lesser dose then dose of the drug is
increased up to full therapeutic dose to look for any reaction. Oral
test is better than topical for confirmation of diagnosing [14].
If a person is hypersensitive to particular drug, he should avoid drugs
from the same group, as he may develop FDE to those similar drugs.
Testing for hypersensitivity may help us to find out other safe drugs
from the same group [2]. Though challenge test are confirmatory and
mandatory for diagnosis, few physicians do not attempt it [13].
Recurrence of similar lesions at same site on taking same medication is
the most important history of fixed drug eruption. We did not confirm
the diagnosis by oral challenge test as the patient herself gave
history of similar symptoms at the same site previously also after
exposure to the same drug and also she was not willing for taking the
same medicine again for fear of aggravation of symptoms.
Conclusion
FDE’s are uncommon adverse reaction of nitroimidazoles,
treating physicians should be aware of it to diagnose and treat it on
time. Fixed drug eruptions are though not fatal can cause cosmetic
disfigurement. Fixed drug eruption in genital region is a matter of
apprehension. Nitroimidazoles are commonly used drugs in India and they
are also taken by patients as self-medication. Whenever FDEs are seen,
immediate withdrawal of the drug should be done, treatment should be
started, and patients should be taught about possible adverse reaction
of such drugs.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission
from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Korkij W, Soltani K. Fixed drug eruptions – a brief
review. Arch Dermatol. 1984; 120:520–4. [PubMed]
2. Sanmukhani J, Shah V, Baxi S, Tripathi C. Fixed drug eruption with
ornidazole having cross-sensitivity to secnidazole but not to other
nitro-imidazole compounds: A case report. Br J ClinPharmacol. 2010 Jun;
69(6):703–704. [PMC free article]
3. Weedon D. Skin Pathology. 2nd. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002.
The lichenoid reaction pattern (‘interface
dermatitis’) pp. 42–3.
4. K Sangma, J Wahlang, M Marak, M Sangma, M Lyngdoh, D Brahma. Fixed
Drug Eruption Due to Tinidazole: 2 Case Reports and Review of
Literature. The Internet Journal of Pharmacology. 2012 Volume 10 Number
1. [PubMed]
5. Kanwar AJ, Sharma R, Rajgopalan M, Kaur S. Fixed drug eruption due
to tinidazole with cross sensitivity to metronidazole. Dermatologica.
1990; 180(4):277. [PubMed]
6. Thami GP, Kanwar AJ. Fixed drug eruption due to metronidazole and
tinidazole without cross-sensitivity to secnidazole. Dermatology; 1998;
196: 368. [PubMed]
7. Arora SK. Metronidazole causing fixed drug eruption. Indian J
Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2002; 68:108-9. [PubMed]
8. S. Gupta, K. Alam, S. Palaian, M.M. Singh, B.C. Dwari, S. Prabhu, M.
Prabhu& P. Mishra: Metronidazole Induced Bullous Fixed Drug
Eruptions: A Case Report And A Review Of Literature. The Internet
Journal of Dermatology; 2007; Volume 5 Number 1.
9. Wahlang JB et al. Fixed drug eruption due to metronidazole: review
of literature and a case report. International Journal of Pharma
Sciences and Research (IJPSR); March 2012; 3(3): 331-334. [PubMed]
10. Jafferany M, Haroon TS. Tinidazole-induced fixed drug eruption. Int
J Dermatol; 1988; 27:279. [PubMed]
11. Bansal A, Kumari R, Ramam M. Fixed drug eruption due to cross
reaction between two azoles used for different indications. Indian J
DermatolVenereolLeprol; 2008; 74:81. [PubMed]
12. Mishra D, Mobashir M and Zaheer MS. Fixed Drug Eruption and
Cross-reactivity Between Tinidazole and Metronidazole. International
Journal of Dermatology; 1990; 29: 740. [PubMed]
13. Gupta R. Fixed Drug Eruption Due to Ornidazole. Indian J Dermatol.
2014 Nov-Dec; 59(6): 635. [PubMed]
14. Marya CM, Sharma G, Parashar VP, Dahiya V. Mucosal fixed drug
eruption in a patient treated with ornidazole. J Dermatol Case Rep.
2012 Mar 27; 6(1):21–24. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Gupta S, Jain VK, Aggarwal K, Gupta S, Mahendra A. Fixed drug
eruption caused by ornidazole. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;
53:300–301. [PubMed]
16. Gupta S, Mahendra A, Gupta S, Kaur S. Multiple fixed drug eruption
caused by ornidazole. Dermatitis. 2010; 21:330–333. [PubMed]
17. Sharma VK, Dhar S, Gill AN. Drug related involvement of specific
sites in fixed eruptions: a statistical evaluation. J Dermatol. 1996
Aug; 23(8):530–534. [PubMed]
18. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roborts EA. A
method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions.
ClinPharmacolTher; 1991; 30: 239-245. [PubMed]
19. Hartwig SC, Siegel J, Schneider PJ. Preventability and severity
assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. Am J Hosp Pharm; 1992;
49: 2229-32. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
Sarkar M K, Mishra R, Pandya P, Bansal A, Bajhaiya B S, Mithun.
Tinidazole-induced fixed drug eruption: A case report. Int J Med Res
Rev 2015;3(7):777-780. doi: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i7.141.