9A Morphometric study of superior
mesenteric artery and its implication in laparoscopic Surgery
Mane RM1, Shinde2
1Dr. Rekha Maruti Mane, Assistant professor, Department of Anatomy, 2Dr. Charushila Shinde, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy,
Mahatma Gandhi Mission medical college, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Address for Corresponding:
Dr. Rekha Maruti Mane, Email: dr. rekhamane@yahoo.com
Abstract
Introduction:
As the field of intestinal surgery advanced over the recent century,
challenge of performing more complex resection and anastomoses
highlighted the presence of vascular variants. The current clinical
interest of these anatomic finding is to laparoscopic colon surgeon. Material and method:
The study was conducted on a 50 embalmed human cadavers in the Anatomy
dissection hall .We performed detailed dissection to measure length and
to note a branching pattern of Superior mesenteric artery and its
branches. Results:
In all 50 cases Superior Mesenteric Artery (SMA) was originated from
abdominal aorta, separated from celiac trunk by 0.9cm + 0.29. All five
branches were seen in all samples with 2% showed additional branches. A
common trunk of Right Colic artery (RCA) and Middle Colic artery (MCA)
was noted in 42%. The numbers of Jejuno-Ilel branches were 7-13 in
number with most common was 9 (26%). Additional branch from jejunal
artery to other viscera was present in 4%. Mean length of MCA, RCA and
Ileo-colic was 3.23 + 1.51, 3.42 + 1.17, and 4.57+ 0.98 respectively.
Pattern of distribution noted was Type A 58%, Type B 32%, Type C 10%. Conclusion: A normal
pattern of colonic vasculature as accepted by most of medical textbook
was not seen in all of the cases. The interest in these anatomical
concepts was not simply to Anatomist but also to surgeons while
performing a safe and efficient laparoscopic or conventional colon
surgery.
Key words:
Superior Mesenteric Artery, Right Colic Artery, Middle Colic Artery
Manuscript received:
4th Mar 2015, Reviewed:
19th Mar 2015
Author Corrected: 5th
Apr 2015, Accepted for
Publication: 24th Apr 2015
Introduction
Surgery has undergone several important changes over last decades.
Technologic and molecular advances have fundamentally changed the way
diseases are treated. In search of giving patient a best possible
outcome new modalities are added or older ones undergoes renewal.
Applications of these new management skills require comprehensive
anatomical background. Pathological involvement of colon is quite
frequent. It ranges from simple benign lesion to fulminate malignant
lesion. Certain anatomical facts like pattern of distribution, variant
course and branches should be taken into consideration in dealing with
them. In carcinoma of colon, Resection (colectomy) is one of the
modality of treatment. This entails ligation of the appropriate colic
arteries at their origin [1, 2]. Thus arterial supply of the specific
segment must be identified in order to offer the patient the best
possible “oncologic” operation. Certain operation
that require incision of the supposed avascular area of the transverse
mesocolon, like retro colic anastomoses (where variant MCA could be
injured) also require an understanding of the some fine points of
mesenteric vascular anatomy [3]. The current clinical interest of these
anatomic finding is in laparoscopic colonic surgery where inability to
palpate these vessels and use of techniques that ligate these
mesenteric vessels intracorporeally requires a thorough knowledge of
mesenteric anatomy [2,4]. This knowledge of the normal and variant
anatomy of the major unpaired arteries originating from the abdominal
aorta and their variants is necessary to accomplish a successful,
uncomplicated abdominal operation.
Materials
and Methods
The study was conducted on 50 embalmed human cadavers in the Anatomy
dissection hall of the MGM Medical College and hospital of Navi Mumbai.
Cadavers with distorted normal anatomy due to abdominal surgery were
excluded .SMA and its branches were exposed by following standard
methods of dissection [5, 6]. The anterior abdominal wall of embalmed
cadaver was incised by taking two incisions. Skin flaps and muscles of
anterior abdominal wall were reflected. Peritoneal cavity was exposed.
Greater omentum, small intestine with its mesentery and large intestine
was identified. The transverse colon and greater omentum was turned
superiorly over costal margin. The coils of the jejunum and ileum were
moved to the left side of the abdomen so that the right side of the
mesentery faces anteriorly. Peritoneum on the right side of mesentery
was removed to expose the branches of superior mesenteric artery Length
of individual branches was measured using measuring tape. Pattern of
arrangement and distribution of arteries into type A, B, and C and
their numbers were noted. All observations were tabulated and
statistically analyzed.
Results
In this study, total 50 embalmed cadavers were dissected. SMA with its
branches and its pattern of distribution were studied. In all the 50
cadavers SMA was originated individually from an abdominal aorta as a
ventral branch separated from celiac trunk by mean distance of 0.9 cm
(0.5-1.4cm). Branches of SMA given on right side (IPDA, MCA, RCA and
Ileocolic artery) were found in all cadavers. Additional branch i.e.
Left colic artery was noted from right side in one cadaver.
MCA and RCA may originate as common trunk or as independent branches.
Common trunk was noted in 42% (21) cadavers and non Common trunk was
seen in remaining sample 58% (29). Branches of SMA given on left side
supplied Jejunum and ileum. In 49 cadavers, it supplied only small
intestine with no additional branches to other viscera. In 1 cadaver
(2%) Accessory colic artery was seen arising from first jejunal artery.
Numbers of Jejuno-Ileal branches were around 7 to 13. Jejuno-Ileal
branches were mostly 9 in number as it was noted in 26% (13) cadaver.
(Table 1)
Table 1: Number of
Jejuno-Ileal branches
Jejuno-Ileal Branches
|
Number
|
Count
|
Percentage
|
7
|
2
|
4%
|
8
|
5
|
10%
|
9
|
13
|
26%
|
10
|
10
|
20%
|
11
|
7
|
14%
|
12
|
12
|
24%
|
13
|
1
|
2%
|
Total
|
50
|
100%
|
Length of branches before its bifurcation was also measured. The mean
length of MCA, RCA and ileocolic artery before its bifurcation was 3.2
cm (0.9-7.1cm), 3.4 cm (0.8-5.8cm) and 4.5 cm (3-7.4cm) respectively.
Table 2: Length of
Branches
Artery
|
Mean(cm)
|
Median(cm)
|
Mode (cm)
|
Standard Devaition
(cm)
|
Minimum
(cm)
|
Maximum
(cm)
|
MCA
|
3.23
|
2.8
|
2.2#
|
1.51
|
0.9
|
7.1
|
RCA
|
3.42
|
3.55
|
2.1#
|
1.17
|
0.8
|
5.8
|
Ileocolic
|
4.57
|
4.4
|
4.1#
|
.987
|
3
|
7.4
|
# Multiple Mode Exists
Measurements were taken to document distance between branches. Distance
between IPDA & MCA, MCA& RCA, RCA & Ileocolic
and root of SMA & jejunal was 2.5cm+ 0.9, 2.75cm + 1.05,
2.87cm+ 0.8 and 3.34cm + 0.85 respectively.
Table 3: Distance between
Branches
Artery
|
Mean
(cm)
|
Median
(cm)
|
Mode
(cm)
|
Stardard
Deviation (cm)
|
Minimum
(cm)
|
Maximum(cm)
|
IPDA & MCA
|
2.5
|
2.3
|
2
|
0.95
|
0.8
|
5.3
|
MCA & RCA
|
2.7
|
2.9
|
1.7
|
1.0
|
0
|
4.4
|
RCA & Ileocolic
|
2.8
|
2.8
|
2#
|
0.8
|
1
|
4
|
Root of SMA & Jejunal
|
3.3
|
3.1
|
3
|
0.85
|
1.9
|
5.1
|
Pattern of distribution was categorised into different types. Depending
upon the number of arterial pedicles it was typed as follows
Type A: Three arterial pedicles. (Fig. 3)
Type B: Two arterial pedicles having a common trunk of MCA and RCA.
(Fig.4)
Type C: Two arterial pedicles having a common trunk of MCA and RCA with
branches of MCA arise individually. (Fig. 5)
In this study percentage of type A, B, C was 58%, 32%, and 10%
respectively.
Table 4: Pattern of
Distribution of Superior Mesenteric Artery
Type of Pattern
|
Count
|
Percentage (%)
|
Type A
|
29
|
58%
|
Type B
|
16
|
32%
|
Type C
|
5
|
10%
|
Discussion
The abdominal vessels, especially the celiac trunk (CT) and the
superior mesenteric artery (SMA) frequently shows diverse anomalies in
their origin and course thus these arteries are studied with great
interest. Several anatomic and radiologic descriptions of variation in
the origin of the ventral branches of abdominal aorta had been reported
in the literature [7]. Until now to our knowledge only
celiacomesenteric trunk (CMT) or celiac- bimesenteric trunk had been
described. The incidence of celiacomesenteric trunk was reported to be
low ranging from 0.4-2.7% [8]. CMT is associated with various other
arterial anomalies [9,10,11]. In all our 50 cadavers SMA originates
from abdominal aorta 100%.
Topographic study of colonic artery was done in past. George R. studied
94 cadavers in which distance between SMA and celiac trunk was 1.6cm
(range0.5 - 3.1cm) [12]. In our study on 50 cadavers distance was 0.9cm
(0.5-1.4cm)
Amongst the three major arteries supplying colon the ileocolic was
constant as cited by many authors. In all 50 cadavers, three major
arteries were found but only difference existed in its pattern of
branching.
The RCA was described as occurring with variable frequency from 38%-78%
and the MCA from 44%-87.8% [13,14]. RCA it may arose as a separate
branch from the right side of the superior mesenteric artery (35%) or
from the ileocolic artery (when it is referred to as an accessory right
colic artery 10%), and occasionally it may be absent (less than 5%)
[15].The frequency of MCA arising from the celiac trunk, the hepatic
artery or the splenic artery was very few 0.5% and 5% [13, 16]. In our
study, two arterial pedicles were in 42% and three arterial trunks were
in 52%.
Table 5: Number of Colic
Arteries arising from SMA (Literature Review)
Author
|
Year
|
Sample
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Nelson TM [17]
|
1988
|
50
|
0
|
22%
|
40%
|
0
|
Garcia-Ruiz A[18]
|
1996
|
56
|
0
|
89.3
|
10.7
|
0
|
Present study
|
2014
|
50
|
---
|
42%
|
52%
|
----
|
SMA gave branches which supplies jejunum and ileum. Those were 7-13
numbers mostly 9 in numbers (24%).
In the study of Igiri AO et al, 72 Nigerian cadavers were dissected to
study the pattern of arrangement and distributions of SMA. Result were
categorized into three groups depending on its pattern distributions:
Group A (60%) Group B (26.7%) Group C (13.3%).In all the cases the
jejunal and ileal arteries were respectively 7-12 and 1-3 in number
[19]. According to the Gourley EJ et al., SMA supplies entire small
bowel by 12-20 jejunal and ileal branches [20].
As per our study, total jejunal and ileal arteries were 7-13 in
numbers. Very few literatures were found on anomalous supply of jejunal
branches to other viscera. But in our study, we noted two cases of
additional supply to other viscera by jejunal artery i.e. to transverse
colon and pancreas.
Kiozumi M et al in his study stated that pancreatic branches may arise
from SMA, MCA or the upper jejunal arteries but he didn’t
mention its frequency. He observed that frequency of accessory colic
artery from the SMA which supply transverse colon was 49.2%. This was
named CSS (arteria colica sinistra superior) [21].
Accessory colic artery originating from the celiac trunk was reported
in few literatures and it was certified as homologues with CSS arising
from the celiac trunk.
Table 6: Frequency of
Accessory colic artery from SMA in past study
Author
|
Year
|
Frequency
|
Kiozumi M [21]
|
1990
|
49.2%
|
Gourley EJ [20]
|
2005
|
10%
|
Present study
|
2014
|
2%
|
Mean length of IPDA, MCA, RCA and Ileo-colic artery was 2 cm, 2.2 cm,
2.2 cm and 4.1cm respectively Distance between individual branches was
noted. Mean distance between root of SMA and IPDA, IPDA and
MCA, MCA and RCA, RCA and Ileo-colic were 2 cm, 1.7 cm, 2 cm and 1.5 cm
respectively.
Table 7:
Measurements found by other authors
Author
|
Year
|
Length of branches
|
MCA
|
RCA
|
Ileocolic
|
Garcia-Ruiz A [18]
|
1995
|
3-7 cm
|
2-7 cm
|
2-12 cm
|
Gourley EJ [20]
|
2005
|
4 cm
|
---
|
---
|
Present study
|
2014
|
2.2cm
|
2.2cm
|
4.1cm
|
Depending upon the number of arterial pedicles and its pattern of
branching we had divided our results into three categories: Type A:
Three arterial pedicles (58%), Type B: Two arterial pedicles having a
common trunk of MCA and RCA (32%), Type C: Two arterial pedicles having
a common trunk of MCA and RCA with branches of MCA arise individually
(10%).
Type A was most commonly documented pattern of arrangement (58%). In
year 2010, the pattern of arrangement and prevalence was studied in the
Nigerian population. They had divided population into three groups,
Group A: Classical three arterial trunks, Jejuno-Ileal branches were
6-17 in number (60%), Group B: Three arterial trunks with ileocolic
gave appendicular artery directly (26.7%) and Group C: Two arterial
trunks with RCA from the ileocolic artery (13.3%)[19]. According to
McGregor AL, three arterial pedicles were seen in 23.8%. RCA arose from
the ileocolic and MCA in 22.7% and 21.5% of cases [22]. In a study
conducted by Nelson TM et al it was found that RCA and MCA arose
separately from SMA in 34% and 58% of samples respectively. In 40% of
sample RCA originate as common trunk. The RCA was a branch of an
ileocolic artery in 30% [17].
Conclusion
A normal pattern of colonic vasculature as accepted by most of medical
textbook was not seen in all of the cases. Most of the cases showed the
variant pattern. Our main endpoint was to emphasize on the current
anatomical facts about colonic blood supply. The interest in these
anatomical concepts was not simply to Anatomist but also to surgeons
while performing a safe and efficient laparoscopic or conventional
colon surgery.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Davis MD, Ballantyne GH. Colorectal cancer. In: ballantyne GH, Leahy
PF, Madlin IM, eds. Laproscopic surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders;
1994:233-56.
2. Milsom JW,Bohm B, Decanini C, Fazio VW. Laproscopic oncologic
proctosigmoidectomy with low colorectal anastomoses in a cadaver model.
Surg Endosc. 1994 Sep;8(9):1117-23. [PubMed]
3. Kodner IJ, Fry D, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH. Colon, rectum
and anus. In: Schwartz SI, Shires GT, Spencer FC. Principles of the
surgery. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994:1191-306.
4. Wexner SD, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG.
Laproscopic total abdominal colectomy: a prospective trial. Dis Colon
Rectum. 1992;35:651-5. [PubMed]
5. Romanes, G. J. Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy.
Thorax and Abdomen. London, Oxford University Press, 2004;2:137. [PubMed]
6. Tank PW. The abdomen. In: Grant's dissector.15th edition.
Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins-Wolters Kluwer Health;
2012;107-11.
7. Michels NA, Siddharth PL, Kornblith PL, Parke WW. The
variant blood supply to the descending colon, rectosigmoid and rectum
based on 400 dissections. Its importance in regional resections: A
review of medical literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 1965 Jul-Aug;8:251-78.
8. Tanuma K, Kitazawa M, Itonaga T, Ooishi H, Ishiwara
A,Kikkawa F. Four cases with the splenic artery of abnormal origin.
Kaibogaku Zasshi.1986 Apr; 61(2):130-7. [PubMed]
9. Higashi N, Sone C. A case of celiaco-mesenteric trunk.
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1987 Oct;62(5):550-6. [PubMed]
10. Inokuchi T, Udatsu K, Tagawa T. A case of the truncus
celiacomesenteric in an adult, with special references to the posterior
pancreatic artery. Med Bull Fukuoka Univ.1981;8:139-42.
11. Yamaki K, Yoshizuka M, Imayama H, Katsume Y, Momota K,
Miyazaki M An anomalous case of truncus celiacomesenteric. J Kurume Med
Assoc.1983;46:893-901. [PubMed]
12. George R. Topography of the Unpaired Visceral Branches
of the Abdominal Aorta. J Anat. 1935 Jan;69(Pt 2):196-205.
13. Michels, NA, P. Siddharth, P. L. Kornblith and W.W.
Parke: The variant blood supply to the small and large intestines. Its
import in regional resections. A new anatomic study based on four
hundred dissections with a complete review of the literature. J
Internat Coll Surg. 1963;39:127–170.
14. Sonneland, J, Anson BJ, Beaton LE. Surgical anatomy of
the arterial supply to the colon from the superior mesenteric artery
based upon a study of 600 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958
Apr;106(4):385-98.
15. Standring S, et al, eds. Gray’s Anatomy, 40th
Ed. Spain: Churchill Livingstone, 2008. ch. 66, 67 p.1125-1137.
16. Sato Y, Takeuchi R, Kawashima T. et al: An
anomalous case of a middle colic artery derived from the splenic
artery. J Kyorin Med Soc 1984;15:87-92.
17. Nelson TM, Pollak R, Jonasson O, Abcarian H. Anatomic
variants of the celiac, superior mesenteric and inferior mesenteric
arteries and their clinical relevance. Clin.Anat. 1988;1(2):75-91.
18. Gracia-Ruiz A, Milsom P, Kornblith PL, et al. Right
colic arterial anatomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:906-11. [PubMed]
19. Igiri AO, Ekong MB, Egemba GO, Asuquo RO. The
pattern of arrangement and distribution of the superior mesenteric
artery in a Nigerian population. Int. J. Morphol.2010;28(1):33-36. [PubMed]
20. Gourley EJ, Gering SA. The meandering mesenteric artery:
a historic review and surgical implications. Dis Colon Rectum
2005;48:996-1000. [PubMed]
21. Koizumi M, Horiguchi M. Accessory arteries supplying the
human transverse colon. Acta Anat (Basel). 1990;137(3):246-51. [PubMed]
22. Decker GAG, du Plesis DJ. Lee McGregor‘s: A
Synopsis of Surgical Anatomy.12th ed. Bombay, India: Varghese
Publishing House; 1995. p.226-228.
How to cite
this article?
Mane RM, Shinde C. A Morphometric study of superior mesenteric artery
and its implication in laparoscopic Surgery. Int J Med Res Rev
2015;3(4):372-377. doi: 10.17511/ijmrr.2015.i4.070.