Omental
Transplantation for limb salvage in Buerger’s disease - a
study in a tertiary care hospital, Bhopal
Krishnanand1,
Chanchlani R2,
1Dr. Krishnanand, Associate Professor, 2Dr. Roshan
Chanchalani, Assistant Professor, Both from Department of Surgery,
Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, M P, India.
Address for
correspondence: Dr Roshan Chanchalani, Email:
roshanchanchlani@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:
In recent years, it has become evident that peripheral vascular disease
is an important predictor of substantial coronary and cerebral vascular
risk. The majority of patients present with an advanced stage of
ischemia; hence, most of them require surgical intervention in the form
of lumbar Sympathectomy, Omentopexy, or major or minor amputations.
Patients presenting with terminal limb ischemia due to thromboangitis
obliterans often have no hope for limb salvage; for such cases, omental
transplantation offers a procedure which can result in improved limb
circulation and limb salvage. Objective:
To study the efficacy of Omental transplantation in peripheral vascular
disease. Material and
Methods: This is a prospective study done on a group of 25
patients. The patients were seen in surgical outdoor in emergency and
routine hours and were diagnosed on the basis of history, clinical
examination and investigations like Colour doppler and femoral
arteriography in few cases. Omentopexy was done and patients were
assessed on 7th post operative day, after 1 month and 3 months after
the procedure. Results: On
an average the patients smoked between 10- 25 beedis per day. Amongst
these cases 10 cases had non-healing ulcers and 15 had dry gangrene of
toes or forefoot, with rest pain. In 15 cases, popliteal artery
pulsation was absent. After operative procedure intermittent
claudication was relieved in 20 patients (80%). Rest pain was relieved
in all the patients at the end of 3 months (100%). Healing of ulcer
occurred in 9 out of 10 patients (90%). The healing of amputated toe
site occurred in 10 out of 15 patients during 3 months follow-up
(66.67%). Conclusion:
Buerger’s disease is limb threatening condition occurring in
productive age group and its management is challenging. If carried out
with right technique and knowledge about vascular omental arcade, the
results of omentopexy are good and this technique can help us avoid
amputations.
Keywords:
Buerger’s disease, Omental transplant, Omental transposition,
Peripheral Vascular disease, Thromoboangitis Obliterans.
Introduction
Buerger’s disease (Thromboangitis Obliterans) is a
condition characterised by segmental occlusion of small and medium
sized arteries of the lower and sometimes of upper extremities in young
male smokers, often associated with migratory thrombophlebitis. [1, 2]
In recent years, it has become evident that Peripheral Vascular Disease
is an important predictor of substantial coronary and cerebral vascular
risk. [3-6] With the exception of cessation of smoking, none of these
measures is curative. Drug therapy is of little benefit. [2, 7-10]
Surgical treatment options have consisted of sympathectomy, direct
arterial surgery, adrenalectomy, and amputation as a last resort. Also,
patients who have ischemic signs and symptoms have been offered
sympathectomy, despite the fact that relapses are frequent due to
normalisation of vasomotor tone within two weeks to six months after
operation. [11-13] Daniel et al [14] hoped omental transfer
for revascularization of extremities will post pone amputation. Casten
and Alday first studied omental transplantation. Goldsmith et
al [15, 16] discovered lipid fraction from the omentum exerts
angiogenic properties. Omentopexy acts by increasing the collateral
circulation as it contains Angiogenic factor. Arterial reconstruction
is usually impossible due to distal nature of the disease and carries a
high failure rate. These considerations have always prompted surgeons
to look for an alternative solution in the form of omental transfer.
Omentopexy is a surgical procedure whereby the greater omentum is
sutured or placed to a nearby organ to improve vascularity.
Material
and Methods
Study design:
This is a prospective study comprising of patients of peripheral
vascular diseases of lower limbs.
Study Place:
Department of Surgery, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital, Bhopal.
Study period: May
2011 to June 2013.
Sample size: A
total of 25 patients presenting with sign and symptoms of Peripheral
vascular disease.
Exclusion
criteria: Obese, diabetic and patients presenting with wet
gangrene.
Procedure: The
patients were seen in surgical outdoor in emergency and routine hours
and were diagnosed on the basis of history, clinical examination and
investigations like Coloured doppler and femoral arteriography in few
cases.
All patients underwent a Doppler scan of the lower limb
prior to Surgery. The Doppler study was done mainly to demonstrate the
block and the flow in the distal vessels. Surgery was done under
general anaesthesia, supine position, midline vertical incision,
omentum mobilized along with its vascular arcade (Figure 1),
subcutaneous tunnelling done (Figure 2) and placed at the distal ulcer
site (Figure 3). In the post operative period, patient were kept nil
orally for 48 hours and switched on to oral feeds once the bowel sounds
returned. Patients were advised to keep the limb in extension for 3-4
days. For assessment of effect of omentopexy the criteria used were
both subjective and objective. Subjective assessment was done by
observing improvement in symptoms and objective assessment was assessed
with:
1) Improvement in the local
skin temperature.
2) Relief in pain.
3) Healing of ulcers and
amputation site.
4) Measurement of oxygen
saturation by pulse oximetry.
The patients were assessed after 7 days, 1 month and 3
months after undergoing the procedure.
Figure 1:
Vascular Omental
Arcade
Figure 2: Subcutanous Tunneling
Figure
3: Omentum placed at distal ulcer
site
Figure 4: Healed wound after one month
Results
The youngest patient in the study was 25yrs old and the
oldest was 60yrs. All of the studied patients were male. All of the
patients were from low socio-economic status. Most of them were
labourers. None of these patients were on any medications
except oral analgesics before admission. All the patients in the study
were non-diabetic and normotensive at the time of admission
Table 1:
Clinical Presentations of cases according to symptoms
Symptoms
|
No.
of patients
|
Percentage
(%)
|
Intermittent
claudication
|
25
|
100
|
Rest
pain
|
15
|
60
|
Ulceration
|
10
|
40
|
Gangrene
|
15
|
60
|
All
the patients presented with pain in lower limbs and intermittent
claudication, most of them had rest pain, ulceration and gangrene.
Table 2:
Patients with their habits
Addiction
|
No.
of patients
|
Percentage
(%)
|
Smoking
|
25
|
100
|
Alcohol
|
15
|
60
|
Smokeless
tobacco
|
5
|
20
|
|
|
|
All
the patients in our study were beedi smokers (100%), 15 (60%) of them
were also occasional alcoholics. 5 (20%) of them also used smokeless
tobacco in pan chewing.
Table 3:
Duration of Smoking
Duration
of smoking (in yrs)
|
No.
of patients
|
Percentage
(%)
|
≤10
yrs
|
6
|
24
|
10-20
yrs
|
14
|
56
|
20-30
yrs
|
5
|
20
|
|
|
|
Most
of our patients were smoking for more than 10 years and around 20 % for
last 20 years.
Table 4:
Peripheral arterial Pulses
Arterial
Pulsation
|
Absent
(n)
|
Weak
(n)
|
Normal
(n)
|
Dorsalis
Pedis Artery
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
Anterior
Tibial Artery
|
25
|
0
|
0
|
Posterior
Tibial Artery
|
23
|
0
|
2
|
Popliteal
Artery
|
20
|
3
|
2
|
Femoral
Artery
|
0
|
3
|
22
|
The
pulses were assessed both by clinical examination and a hand held
Doppler probe. Dorsalis Pedis, Anterial Tibial and Posterior Tibial
were absent in most of the patients.
Table 5:
Extent of the disease
Disease
Extent
|
No.
of patients
|
%
|
Disease
restricted to one limb
|
25
|
100
|
Disease
involving B/L lower limbs
|
13
|
52
|
Disease
involving B/L lower limbs and upper limbs
|
1
|
4
|
All
the patients in the study presented with symptoms involving only one
lower limb. But during clinical examination, 52% of patients also had
involvement of opposite lower limb. 4% of them had clinical involvement
of upper limb.
Table 6:
Duration of Hospital stay
Duration
of hospital stay
|
No.
of patients
|
Percentage
(%)
|
<2
days
|
1
|
3
|
20-30
days
|
17
|
67
|
30-40
days
|
4
|
16
|
>40
days 5
|
3
|
12
|
In
post operative period, 10 patients had postoperative infection of
wounds. All of these patients were treated with regular dressing and
antibiotic according to culture and sensitivity reports. Duration of
hospital stay varied from 15-90 days. Most of the patients stayed for
20-30 days. The length of post operative stay was increased in the
patients due to wound infections and due to no improvement following
the procedure. During follow-up the patients were assessed at 7th day,
1 month (figure 4) and 3 months following intervention.
Table 7:
Follow up Results showing symptomatic improvement
Symptom
|
At
the time of diagnosis
No
(%)
|
7th
day
No
(%)
|
1st
Month
No
(%)
|
3rd
Month
No
(%)
|
Intermittent
claudication
|
25
(100)
|
17
(66)
|
7 (27)
|
4
(17)
|
Rest
pain
|
15
(60)
|
7
(27)
|
4 (17)
|
0
(0)
|
Healing
of ulcer
|
10 (40)
|
9
(37)
|
7 (27)
|
1
( 4)
|
Healing
of amputated site
|
15
(60)
|
15
(60)
|
11
(43)
|
4
(17)
|
Most
of the patients had symptomatic improvement in all major symptoms i.e.
intermittent claudication and Rest pain.
Table 8:
saturation of limb during follow up
O2
saturation
|
At
time of diagnosis
|
7th
day
|
1st
month
|
3rd
month
|
|
70
|
80
|
90
|
96
|
Oxygen saturation was increased in toes during follow up.
Discussion
Buerger's
disease is a limb-threatening condition occurring in the young and
productive age group and its management has always been a challenging
problem. [17] Buerger’s disease (Thromboangitis Obliterans)
is a condition characterised by segmental occlusion of small and medium
sized arteries of the lower and sometimes of upper extremities in young
male smokers, often associated with migratory thrombophlebitis. In
recent years, it has become evident that Peripheral Vascular Disease is
an important predictor of substantial coronary and cerebral vascular
risk. With the exception of cessation of smoking, none of these
measures is curative. In patients with critical limb ischemia, surgery
is required to salvage the limb. Traditionally, patients who have
ischemic signs and symptoms have been offered sympathectomy despite the
fact that relapses are frequent due to normalization of vasomotor tone
within 2 weeks to 6 months after operation. Sympathectomy removes the
vasoconstrictor tone improving blood flow and promoting ulcer healing
and improving pain. But it does not increase flow to ischemic muscles
and thus no improvements occur in claudication distance. Its long term
role in chronically dilated ischemic vessels is also questionable [18
,19] Direct revascularization surgeries are not possible due to diffuse
involvement and absence of distal target vessel. [20]
In patients who are in imminent danger of requiring major
amputation, omental pedicled transplantation is a viable alternative
for limb salvage and also significantly improves signs and symptoms.
Babu et al [21] report in this article relief in intermittent
claudication in 92% patients with TAO, relief from rest pain in 86%,
healing of ulcers in 100% of their patients. 14% of their patients
required major amputation. Ranwaka et al [22]
obtained relief in intermittent claudication in 86.6%, from rest pain
in 66.6% and healing of ulcers in 80% in their patients. The results in
our study are consistent with these results of some previous studies.
The mechanism by which omentopexy increases vascularity of the ischemic
limb is not exactly known, probably omental transposition works by
promoting local collateralization, since omentum is known to possess
angiogenic factor, which stimulates the formation of capillary channels
making available collateral channels in the existing circulation.
Subodh.et al [23] report in this article to find
out the mechanism by which the omental graft increases the
blood supply to the limbs. They performed Doppler ultrasound studies
and celiac digital subtraction angiography to study the circulation
though the omental graft. Only in 6 out of 12 patients could they
visualize omental vessels till mid-thigh and only in four up to the
knee joint. They concluded that omental transposition acts not by
significantly supplying extra blood to the limbs but by acting locally
on the limb musculature and probably causing increased collateral
circulation. Although in the absence of such investigating
facilities and financial constraints, we were not able to visualize
omental vessels but we could certainly appreciate an excellent
symptomatic relief obtained in these patients. There was immediate
relief of pain, the progression of gangrene stopped, and ulcers healed;
a certain major amputation was avoided in 90% of patients. Another
interesting finding in the present series was that most of the patients
experienced pain relief, immediately following surgery. Possible causes
may be (i) Psychological relief that operation has been performed (ii)
Bed rest (hospital admission) (iii) Supervision and almost complete
stoppage of smoking leading to remission of the disease. In the present
study, objective tests were carried out to see improvement in
circulation. Skin temperature increased in 90% of patients. Pulse
oximetry, an excellent method of assessing limb perfusion revealed a
clear benefit in tissue oxygenation after pedicled omental
transplantation.
Conclusion
Omental transplantation offers a procedure which can result
in improved limb circulation and limb salvage in patients with Buergers
disease.with limb ischemia. Omental transplantation induces
neo-angiogenesis thereby improving circulation of surrounding tissues.
Single stage lumbar sympathectomy and omental transplantation is a
better procedure in end state. Thrombo angitis obliterans. Omental
transplantation is a operation, which can be performed by general
surgeon and immediate improvement in symptoms cannot be explained on
psychological basis alone as was demonstrated by increase in skin
temperature and improved tissue oxygenation by pulse oximetry. The
present study has short comings in the form of (i) short
duration of follow up (ii) no Doppler or angiographic evidence during
follow up (iii) No histological proof of neovascularization of muscles.
(iv) Abdominal approach & bowel handling (v) Small
series. The present study however proved beyond doubt the role of
omental transplantation in clinical improvement and as a limb salvage
procedure in Buerger’s disease. Long term prospective
randomised and controlled clinical trials with good follow up is needed
to establish this procedure as the first line management of patients
with Buerger’s disease.
Funding: Nil
Conflict of
interest: Nil
Permission
from IRB: Yes
References
1. Buerger L. Thromboangitis Obliterans: a study of the
vascular lesions leading to presenile spontaneous gangrene. Am J Med
Sci 1908; 136:567-580.
2. Olin JW. Thromboangitis Obliterans (Buerger’s
Disease). New Engl J Med 2000; 343:864-869. [PubMed]
3. Ogren M, Hedblad B, Isacsson S. Ten year
cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality in 68 year old men
with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. BMJ 1995; 310: 1294-129. [PubMed]
4. Tsai A, Folsom A, Rosamond W, Jones D.
Ankle–brachial index and 7-year ischemic stroke incidence.
The ARIC Study. Stroke 2001; 32: 1721-1724. [PubMed]
5. Bainton D, Sweetnam P, Baker I, Elwood P. Peripheral
vascular disease: consequence for survival and association with risk
factors in the Speedwell prospective heart disease study. Br Heart J
1994; 72: 128-132. [PubMed]
6. Newman A, Shemanski L, Manolio T. Ankle–arm
index as a predictor of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the
Cardiovascular Health Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999; 19:
538-545. [PubMed]
7. Fiessinger JN, Schafer M. Trial of iloprost versus
aspirin treatment for critical limb ischaemia of thromboangitis
obliterans. The TAO study. Lancet 1990; 335:555-557. [PubMed]
8. Talwar S, Choudhary SK, Bhan A. Buerger’s
disease. Indian Journal of Cardiology 1998; 1:31-34.
9. Stricht VJ, Goldstein M, Flamand JP, Belenger J.
Evolution and prognosis of thromboangitis obliterans. J Cardiovasc Surg
(Torino)1973; 14:9-16. [PubMed]
10. Kunlin J, Lengua F, Testart J, Pajot A. F.
Thromboangiosis or thromboangitis treated by adrenalectomy and
sympathectomy from 1942 to 1962. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1973
;14:21-27. [PubMed]
11. Lau H, Cheng SK. Buerger’s disease in Hong
Kong: a review of 89 cases. Aust NZ J Surg 1997; 67:264-269.
12. Sasajima T, Kubo Y, Inaba M, Goh K. Plantar or dorsalis
pedis artery bypass in Buerger’s disease. Ann Vasc Surg 1994;
8:248-257. [PubMed]
13. Stricht VJ, Goldstein M, Flamand JP, Belenger J.
Evolution and prognosis of thromboangitis obliterans. J Cardiovasc Surg
(Torino)1973; 14:9-16. [PubMed]
14. Casten DF, Alday ES. Omental transfer for
revascularization of the extremities. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971;
123:301-304. [PubMed]
15. Goldsmith HS, Griffith AL, Catsimpoolas N. Increased
vascular perfusion after administration of an omental lipid fraction.
Surg Gynecol Obstet 1986; 162:579-583. [PubMed]
16. Goldsmith HS, Griffith AL, Kupferman A, Catsimpoolas N.
Lipid Angiogenic factor from Omentum. JAMA 1984; 252:2034-2036.
[PubMed]
17. Talwar S, Choudhary S K. Omentopexy for limb salvage in
Buerger's disease: indications, technique and results. J Postgrad Med
2001 [cited 2013 Aug 1];47:137. [PubMed]
18. Chander J, Singh L, Lal P, Jain A, Lal P, Ramteke VK.
Retroperitoneoscopic lumbar sypathectomy
for buerger’s disease: a novel technique. J Soc Laproendosc
Surg. 2004;8(3):291–296. [PubMed]
19. Shionoya S. Buerger’s disease (Thromboangiitis
Obliterans). Vascular surgery, vol. 4.
Philadelphia: RB Rutherford, WB Saunders; 2010. pp. 235–245.
20. Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Papas TT, Nikolopoulos ES.
Diagnostic criteria and treatment of Buerger’s disease: a
review. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2006;5(2):89–95. [PubMed]
21. Babu RD, Menon NG, Vaidyanathan S. Pedicled omental
transplantation forend stage. Buerger’s disease as a limb
salvage procedure. Indian Journal of Surgery 1990; 52; 463-71.
22. Ranwaka R, Sharma R, Mathur SN, Sachdeva G.
Revascularisation oflimbs by omental transfer. Ind J Surg. 1999;
61:364–366.
23. Subodh S., Mohan JC, Malik VK, Omentopexy in limbs
revascularization in Buerger’s disease. Indian Heart J 1994;
46; 355-357. [PubMed]
How to cite
this article?
Krishnanand, Chanchlani R. Omental Transplantation for limb
salvage in Buerger’s disease - a study in a tertiary care
hospital, Bhopal. Int J Med Res Rev 2013;1(3):92-98.