Pancreatic serous cystadenoma
– A case report
Grandhi B1, Shanthi V2, Rao
NM3, Reddy VC4, Mohan KM5,
1Dr. Bhavana Grandhi, MD, Assistant Professor, 2Dr.Vissa
Shanthi, MD, Associate Professor, 3Dr. Nandam Mohan Rao, MD,
Associate Professor, 4Dr.Vengala Chidananda Reddy, MD, DCP.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Pathology, 5Dr. Kuppili Murali Mohan,
Professor & HOD. All are affiliated with NTR University of
Health Sciences & Department of Pathology, Narayana Medical
College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
Address for
correspondence: Dr Bhavana Grandhi, Email:
drbhavana.grandhi@gmail.com
Abstract
Microcystic serous cystadenoma is a benign tumor of pancreas, also
termed as Clear cell or Glycogen rich adenoma. It occurs at any site in
pancreas and composed of small cystic spaces lined by small cuboidal
cells with clear cytoplasm, glycogen. There is an association with von
Hippel Lindau syndrome in few cases. Clinical symptoms are variable.
Excision is almost curative. We report a case of 70 year old male who
presented to the OPD with vague complaints of local discomfort.
Ultrasound showed a mass in the pancreas. Pancreatectomy was done and
diagnosed as microcystic serous cystadenoma of pancreas on
histopathology.
Keywords:
Microcystic serous cystadenoma, Pancreatic tumours, Pancreactomy.
Manuscript received:
27th April 2014, Reviewed:
15th May 2014
Author Corrected:
20th June 2014, Accepted
for Publication: 5th July 2014
Introduction
Serous cystic neoplasms constitute 10% of surgically resected cystic
pancreatic neoplasms. It is a benign tumor with female predominance,
composed of small cystic spaces lined by small cuboidal cells with
clear cytoplasm, glycogen. The mean age of presentation is 66 years.
Clear cell or glycogen rich adenomas are the widely used synonyms for
this entity. It is proposed that the cell of origin is centroacinar
cell or intercalated duct system. They can occur at any site in
pancreas [1]. In some cases it is associated with von Hippel Lindau
syndrome. Clinical symptoms include local discomfort or pain,
obstruction if the tumor is in the pancreatic head and diabetes if
sufficient numbers of islets are destroyed by the tumour. Excision is
almost curative [2].
Case
Report
A 70 year old male presented to the OPD with vague complaints of local
discomfort and pain. Ultrasound showed a mass in the pancreas. CT scan
showed areas of calcification. Pancreatectomy was done and we received
the specimen. On gross examination, a well circumscribe mass was seen
in the head of the pancreas measuring 3x3cm (Figure 1). Rest of the
pancreas was normal. Multiple tiny cystic spaces were seen giving a
spongy appearance. Histopathological examination revealed multiple
cysts lined by cuboidal cells (Figure 2).The cells had clear cytoplasm
and bland nucleus (Figure 3). A final diagnosis of Microcystic serous
cystadenoma of pancreas was given. The surgery was uneventful and the
patient was discharged.
Discussion
Serous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are divided into two
categories: microcystic and mucinous. Microcystic serous cystadenoma
accounts for up to 10% of the total cystic neoplasms of pancreas. In a
few number of cases, it is associated with Von Hippel Lindau disease.
The chief complaints are abdominal mass with associated local pain and
discomfort but in some cases they may be asymptomatic [3]. Grossly the
tumor is large, multiloculated with sharply outlined cysts filled with
clear fluid. It has a spongy consistency similar to infantile
polycystic kidney. In some cases, a central stellate scar is present.
The tumor may be macrocystic (megacystic, oligocystic, usually <
10 cysts or microcystic (1-3mm).The predictors of aggressive behavior
are large size of the tumor and location of the tumor in the head of
pancreas [4]. Microscopic examination reveals small cystic spaces lined
by cuboidal cells with clear cytoplasm (glycogen), and minimal mucin.
Myoepithelial layer is intact and the cells have centrally placed
hyperchromatic nuclei with occasionally
Fig 1: multiloculated
with sharply outlined
cysts
Fig 2: Microcystic
serous cystadenoma, H&E (10x)
Fig 3: Microcystic serous cystadenoma, H&E (40x)
papillae [5] and the islets between the lobules may calcify (radiating
pattern). In a rare case, oncocytic change can be seen [6]. Another
variant, the solid variant also exists where there are no cystic spaces
and the cells are arranged in nests, sheets and trabeculae separated by
thick fibrous bands [7]. Electron microscopic examination reveals
prominent villi with glycogen granules and the epithelial cells are
connected by occluding junctions and belt desmosomes resting on a
basement membrane [8]. Imaging modalities are an aid in the diagnosis
of serous cystadenoma of pancreas. On Ultrasound, more than six loculi,
less than 2 cm in diameter are seen [9]. On plain CT, a sunburst
pattern of calcification with a central scar is pathognomonic, but
occurs in only 30% of patients [10]. On contrast-enhanced CT,
enhancement occurs especially in the areas of septation [11].
The differential diagnosis of SCA is considered very important as SCAs
may not require surgery. A misdiagnosis of pseudocysts or mucinous
cystic tumors is always a possibility because of the oligocystic or
unilocular nature in all these entities [12]. A majority of the
patients with pseudocysts have a history of pancreatitis and often
present at an elder age. Hypervascularity is another feature
distinguishing SCA from pseudocysts [13]. Endoscopic retrograde
pancreatography has a distinct role in the differential diagnosis where
a communication is seen with the pancreatic duct in case of the
pseudocyst in 70% of the cases, whereas such a communication is absent
in SCAs [14, 15]. On CT scan, mucinous cystic tumors have a few, large
loculi with thin septa and peripheral calcifications are seen in
mucinous tumors and pseudocysts but in case of SCA, intratumoral
calcifications are seen. Fine-needle aspiration of cystic lesions for
cytological and biochemical analysis of the fluid can be performed in
cases where the distinction of SCAs from mucinous cystadenomas and
pseudocysts is less clear by US or CT. On cytological analysis,
periodic acid-Schiff stains show abundant cytoplasmic glycogen, and
stains for mucins are negative in case of SCA [16]. The cells are
cuboidal to polygonal in shape with no mitoses. Cytological analysis is
diagnostic in about 50% to 60% of cases. Biochemical analysis of cyst
fluid may include amylase and some tumor markers such as
carcinoembryonic antigen, NB/70K, CA 72-4, CA 125, CA 15-3 tissue
polypeptide antigen, and pS2 protein [17-19]. Amylase content of the
fluid in SCAs is usually lower than the levels in pseudocysts and
mucinous cystic tumors. SCAs have lower levels of tumor markers
compared to mucinous cystic tumors. We have presented this case because
of its rarity, especially in men.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: Nil
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Laura,Webb, Lamps, Diagnostic Pathology Hepatobiliary and
Pancreatic, In.Amirsys Publishing Inc;2011,11-5-14.
2. George DH, Murphy F, Michalski R, Ulmer BG. Serous cystadenoma of
the pancreas: a new entity? Am J Surg Pathol 1989; 13(1):61-6. [PubMed]
3. Pancreas and periampullary region In, Rosai & Ackermann
Surgical Pathology, 9th edition Mosby Publishers Vol I; 2010.
4. Lesandrowsky K. Macrocystic serous Cystadenoma of the Pancreas: A
morphologic variant differing from Microcystic Adenoma.Hum Pathol 1992;
23:871. [PubMed]
5. Bill A. Rampy, DO, PhD; Irving Waxman, MD; Shu-Yuan Xiao, MD;
Roberto Logron˜o, MD.Serous Cystadenoma of the Pancreas With
Papillary Features.A Diagnostic Pitfall on Fine-Needle Aspiration
Biopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125:1591.
6. Panarelli NC, Park KJ, Hruban RH, Klimstra DS. Microcystic serous
cystadenoma of the pancreas with subtotal cystic degeneration: another
neoplastic mimic of pancreatic pseudocyst. Am J Surg Pathol 2012;
36:726-31.
6. Panarelli NC, Park KJ, Hruban RH, Klimstra DS. Microcystic
serous cystadenoma of the pancreas with subtotal cystic degeneration:
another neoplastic mimic of pancreatic pseudocyst. Am J Surg Pathol
2012; 36:726-31. [PubMed]
8. Pathology outlines.com [PubMed]
9. Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Charboneau JW, et al. Cystic pancreatic
tumors: CT and sonographic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988; 151:
1133-8. [PubMed]
10. Healy JC, Davies SE, Reznek RH. CT of microcystic (serous)
pancreatic adenoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:146-8. [PubMed]
11. Balthazar EJ, Chako AC. Computed tomography of pancreatic masses.
Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 343-9. [PubMed]
12. Warshaw AL, Rutledge PL. Cystic tumors mistaken for pancreatic
pseudocysts. Ann Surg 1987; 205: 393-8. [PubMed]
13. Itai Y, Ohhashi K, Furui S, et al. Microcystic adenoma of the
pancreas: spectrum of computed tomographic findings. J Comput Assist
Tomogr 1988; 12: 797-803. [PubMed]
14. O'Connor M, Kolars J, Ansel U, et al. Preoperative endoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the surgical management of
pancreatic pseudocysts. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 18-24.
15. Yamaguchi K, Chijiwa K, Shimizu S, et al. Comparison of endoscopic
retrograde and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the
surgical diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Am J Surg 1998; 175: 203-8.
16. Laucirica R, Schwartz MR, Ramzy I. Fine needle aspiration of
pancreatic cystic epithelial neoplasms. Acta Cytologica 1992; 36: 881-6. [PubMed]
17. Lewandrowski K, Southern J, Pins M, et al. Cyst fluid analysis in
the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts: a comparison of pseudocysts, serous
cystadenomas, mucinous cystic neoplasms, and mucinous
cystadenocarcinomas. Ann Surg1993; 217: 41-7.
18. Hammel P, Levy P, Voiter H, et al. Preoperative cyst fluid analysis
is useful for the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the
pancreas. Gastroenterology 1995; 108: 1230-5. [PubMed]
19. Yong WH, Southern JF, Warshaw AL, et al. Cyst fluid NB/70K
concentration and leukocyte esterase: two new markers for
differentiating pancreatic serous tumors from pseudocysts. Pancreas
1995; 10: 342-6. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
Grandhi B, Shanthi V, Rao NM, Reddy VC, Mohan KM. Pancreatic serous
cystadenoma – A case report. Int J Med Res Rev
2014;2(4):382-384.doi:10.17511/ijmrr.2014.i04.020